Not the best ... but after waiting 15 hours to testify, it'll do ... please, if you can, reach out to your legislators ... tell them the facts about what is happening ... oh, and please watch all of the other persons that testified at .... http://ct-n.com/ctnplayer.asp?odID=11304
Posted by Hector Morera on Saturday, March 21, 2015
Posted by Children's Rights on Thursday, August 6, 2015
Join the Discussion. ~ Tell us how you think the Court's perception of Pro Se Litigation improved in recent year?
Pro-se Winners Child Protective Services Victim Support - Pro Se Litigation - The Good Men Project - Pro se legal...
Posted by Boycottfamilylaw : Restore Children's Rights Worldwide on Monday, May 25, 2015
Childrens Rights Florida A Parental Rights Movement Florida Florida Women for Alimony Reform - FLWAR Florida AccessTo...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, July 27, 2015
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Saturday, May 3, 2014
Posted by Jess Brodie on Saturday, July 4, 2015
The US Supreme Court noted that " in the federal courts, the right of self-representation has been protected by statute...
Posted by Thomas L Switzer on Tuesday, March 31, 2015
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChildrensRightsFlorida/National Association of Pro Se Litigants, Inc. Pro Se Law ...
Posted by Children's Rights on Sunday, February 9, 2014
Stand Up For Zoraya is the voice of the child What Does Name "Zoraya" Mean? You have aspiration and inspiration,...
Posted by Omar Inguanzo on Thursday, May 15, 2014
And left them no choice but to defend themselves and their children in self defense from the myriad of intolerable atrocities for profit and the interagency efforts to silence the whistleblowers.
Posted by Joseph L Kenick III on Friday, January 17, 2014
National Family Court Watch Project Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute Family Advocate for Family Children's...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, December 30, 2013
Pro Bono Net Cuban American Bar Association PRO Bono Project National Association of Pro Se Litigants, Inc. Pro Se Law Pro-se Winners Pro Se Litigation Pro se legal representation in the United States
Posted by Children's Rights on Sunday, March 23, 2014
Posted by Jess Brodie on Saturday, July 4, 2015
Posted by Children's Rights on Sunday, August 10, 2014
For those who do not know Pro-Se are people who represent themselves because of the corrupt system/courts
Posted by Sheila George on Thursday, February 27, 2014
In light of an article I read, entitled: The Sorry State of Indigent Defense, I want to highlight a specific section in...
Posted by Denise Rotheimer on Wednesday, February 12, 2014
People United For Legal System Equality (P.U.L.S.E.) shared a link.If you are a Pro Se Litigant, thinking of being...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, December 1, 2014
Who Are The Heroes Who Braved Retaliation to Subpoena & Review DHS Records?Our Strength Is In Our Ability to...
Posted by Roxanne Grinage on Friday, August 3, 2012
The Judicial Branch made judicial corruption and injustice legal, and in doing so they undermined the US...
Posted by Terance Healy on Monday, June 2, 2014
Pro Se America vs American Bar AssociationsWWW.ProSeAmerica.net
Posted by Janice Wolk Grenadier on Thursday, August 28, 2014
Posted by Scott Adams on Saturday, June 13, 2015
Let's Join The Purple Keyboard Campaign 4 Family Justice Reform!
Posted by Scott Adams on Sunday, December 14, 2014
Patriots, First a case in point:The case of Ulrich v. Butler case # 09-7660, was a civil case attempting to hold the...
Posted by Lazaro Ecenarro on Tuesday, June 9, 2015
I make the following observation as a pro se litigant in family court after reading information shared with me by others...
Posted by Ronald Pierce on Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Cathy Cohen makes a legitimate criticism of the State Bar where it does the opposite of its duty to the public...
Posted by Ronald Pierce on Tuesday, August 19, 2014
“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…” ~ Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.
ReplyDeleteRedress, Inc. 501c3 nonprofit corporation, created to combat corruption. Our purpose is to provide real assistance and solutions for citizens suffering from injustices. We operate as a formal business, with a Board of Directors guiding us. We take the following actions to seek redress: Competently organize as citizens working for the enforcement of our legal rights. Form a coalition so large and so effective that the authorities can no longer ignore us. We support and align with other civil rights groups and get our collective voices heard. Work to pass laws that benefit us and give us the means to fight against corruption, as is our legal right, and we work to repeal laws that are in violation of our legal rights. Become proactive in the election process, by screening of political candidates. As individuals, we support those who are striving to achieve excellence, and show how to remove from office those who have failed to get the job done. Make our presence known through every legal means. We monitor our courts and judges. We petition our government representatives for the assistance they are bound to provide us. We publicize our cases and demand redress. Create a flow of income that enables us to fight back in court, and to assist our members impoverished by the abuses inflicted on us. Create the means to relieve the stresses on us, as we share information and support each other. We become legal advocates for each other; we become an emotional support network for each other; we problem solve for individuals on a group basis! Educate our judges, lawyers, court personnel, law enforcement personnel and elected leaders about our rights as citizens! Actively work to eliminate incompetence, bias/prejudice, special relationships and corruption at all levels of government! Work actively with all media sources, to shed light on our efforts. It is reasonable to expect that if the authorities know we are watching and documenting, that their behaviors will improve. IT'S A HUGE TASK! Accountability will not happen overnight. But we believe that through supporting each other, we support ourselves. This results in a voice for justice and redress that cannot be ignored. Please become familiar with our web site, and feel free to call. We need each other - help us to help you! Although we are beginning operations in Nevada, we intend to extend into each state in a competent fashion. We are NOT attorneys, unless individual attorneys join us as members. We are simply people helping people. For those interested, we do not engage in the practice of law. You might be interested in this article Unauthorized Practice of Law on the Net. Call Redress, Inc. at 702.597.2982 or e-mail us at Redress@redressinc.com. WORKING TOGETHER TO ATTAIN FAIRNESS
PRO SE RIGHTS:
ReplyDeleteSims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.
Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."
Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."
Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).
Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."