Let's Join The Purple Keyboard Campaign((Activate :2015))4 Family Justice Reform!Operation CPS reform and Family law...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, May 25, 2015
Dear Senator Nelson:
Dear Senator Rubio:Dear Representative Diaz-Balart:
Families are being abused by State CPS and Family Courts
through out the United States of America, this is a major issue that needs to
be addressed, Families that have had their civil rights violated through family
court proceedings and the fact that all due process and constitutional rights
are violated and manipulated by family court judges, District Attorneys, and
Commissioners of /social services departments as well as CPS workers, and court
appointed attorneys that are not working for the clients but have helped
incriminate parents. Also of extreme interest, is obtaining
names/phone/location of CPS workers who are falsifying or have falsified
documents in court and who have lied in a court setting. The people of Florida and the People of the United States of America demand a full
investigation of all departments, and the termination of department until
further the people also wish to sue for government entrapment as well as a suit
brought against the case workers, family court judges, and district lawyers.
The People through discovery have found:
1. The imbalance of funding is creating corruption
2. Corruption has filtered through all manner of government
and related agencies
3. Judicial decisions violate the public trust
4. Laws are created and passed that give parens patriae
unlimited power not provided by the Constitution
5. The pendulum has swung to create a monopoly strategy of funding
extracted from dwindling Social Services that have been set up to help families
in need is devastating families across America
6. Children's lives are at stake while in the care of
government funded agencies, such as rape, sexual abuse, physical abuse and
neglect, mental abuse, and statistics show our children are being killed while
in government placements out side of the parental home/or close relatives
7. That the states are not following guidelines placing
children with relatives but are screening them out using different criteria
with foster families, or falsifying documents to entrap parents and not keeping
the children in the home with parents but removing the children without due
process or any true purpose other then to incriminate parents/family members
and to insure family is unfit
8. That pockets of tyranny are going unchecked without
recourse
9. Congress local government/ civil and family courts is not
responsive to The People
10. That The People have been turned away from civil courts,
and from family courts higher court of appeals, only to remain battered and
bruised by the tyranny of these local government funded courts as the judges,
case workers/commissioners and district attorneys mock the outraged parents and
children of which they so willingly strip of their civil rights and liberties
The People are declaring a public health crisis and human
rights violation as well as their Civil rights are being stripped and taken
from them and their families, as a result of these above atrocities and also In
addition, The People find the Parens Patriae to be more than a doctrine but a
specialized position created by the government for the government that violates
Article 1 Sec 9, 10: No title of nobility or honors shall be granted by the United
States. The title extends to the courts, Children’s Administration and public
education violating Amendment 14 depriving persons of life, liberty and
property without due process. The position applies as a collective.
The People are ordering an investigation of the
departments as well as Family courts through out the United States of America
and most important in New York State the people of the United States ask that
all family court files, case files, court tapes, and videos be put into the
investigation, as well as there be a federal lockdown on all CPS and family
courts so that no tampering of documents can be done by such agencies, the fact
is family court documents will show the fact that they are mishandled and
manipulated by these agencies to insure incriminating charges are inevitable
and due process is not being carried out, civil rights are violated, all human
rights are violated and the United States Constitution is not on the agenda of
these agencies. And the people of the United States of America
DSM UPDATE - While the terms; Parental Alienation or Parental Alienation Syndrome did not make it into the DSM IV, not all is lost. Instead, what you will find is a discussion regarding the 'Child/Parent Relational Problem' where the discourse surrounds the cognitive issues of the problem that have the potential to include; "negative attributions of the other's intentions, hostility toward or scapegoating of the other, and unwarranted feelings of estrangement." According to Dr. William Bernet, one of the proponents for the PA language inclusion, "That's a pretty good description of a child's view of the alienated parent. “ At the very least, what has been acknowledged here is the conditions that must be present for alienation of one parent to occur. This is similar to what Dr. Craig Childress calls the 'parental alienation dynamic'. Same/same. All it really amounts to is the DSM IV acknowledging that these behaviors can lead a child to have cognitive problems of feeling 'unwarranted feelings of estrangement' towards what we call the 'target parent'.
Published on Oct 19, 2012
Dean Tong is a forensic trial consultant, expert witness and author of Elusive Innocence. His life's work has been squarely centered on helping the falsely accused find justice. If you live in Florida and have been falsely accused of child sexual abuse, or think that you might be, you need to call Dean Tong right now for a free thirty-minute consultation. His clients are both men and woman. Mr. Tong can provide you and your attorney if you have one with defense strategies that have proven to be effective and successful. In addition, Tong is available as a consultant for your defense team and as an expert witness free of charge to you. He Is approved in the state of Florida as an expert in cognitive child developmental psychology. This means any litigant in a juvenile - dependency case against the Florida DCF and/or criminal court case against the State of Florida can retain Dean Tong as an expert at no cost to the accused.
So pick up the phone right now and call Dean Tong for a free thirty-minute consultation. 813-657-4930.
So pick up the phone right now and call Dean Tong for a free thirty-minute consultation. 813-657-4930.
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 10, 2015
Posted by Children's Rights on Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Let's Join The Purple Keyboard Campaign((Activate :2015))4 Family Justice Reform!Operation CPS reform and Family law...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, May 25, 2015
“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…” ~ Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.
ReplyDeleteRedress, Inc. 501c3 nonprofit corporation, created to combat corruption. Our purpose is to provide real assistance and solutions for citizens suffering from injustices. We operate as a formal business, with a Board of Directors guiding us. We take the following actions to seek redress: Competently organize as citizens working for the enforcement of our legal rights. Form a coalition so large and so effective that the authorities can no longer ignore us. We support and align with other civil rights groups and get our collective voices heard. Work to pass laws that benefit us and give us the means to fight against corruption, as is our legal right, and we work to repeal laws that are in violation of our legal rights. Become proactive in the election process, by screening of political candidates. As individuals, we support those who are striving to achieve excellence, and show how to remove from office those who have failed to get the job done. Make our presence known through every legal means. We monitor our courts and judges. We petition our government representatives for the assistance they are bound to provide us. We publicize our cases and demand redress. Create a flow of income that enables us to fight back in court, and to assist our members impoverished by the abuses inflicted on us. Create the means to relieve the stresses on us, as we share information and support each other. We become legal advocates for each other; we become an emotional support network for each other; we problem solve for individuals on a group basis! Educate our judges, lawyers, court personnel, law enforcement personnel and elected leaders about our rights as citizens! Actively work to eliminate incompetence, bias/prejudice, special relationships and corruption at all levels of government! Work actively with all media sources, to shed light on our efforts. It is reasonable to expect that if the authorities know we are watching and documenting, that their behaviors will improve. IT'S A HUGE TASK! Accountability will not happen overnight. But we believe that through supporting each other, we support ourselves. This results in a voice for justice and redress that cannot be ignored. Please become familiar with our web site, and feel free to call. We need each other - help us to help you! Although we are beginning operations in Nevada, we intend to extend into each state in a competent fashion. We are NOT attorneys, unless individual attorneys join us as members. We are simply people helping people. For those interested, we do not engage in the practice of law. You might be interested in this article Unauthorized Practice of Law on the Net. Call Redress, Inc. at 702.597.2982 or e-mail us at Redress@redressinc.com. WORKING TOGETHER TO ATTAIN FAIRNESS
PRO SE RIGHTS:
ReplyDeleteSims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.
Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."
Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."
Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).
Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."