NCFM Advisor GORDON E. FINLEY Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Emeritus — Governor waging war on men vetoed alimony reform
Editor: Yet again Florida’s Medicare Fraudster lies to the citizens of Florida and continues his war on men (“Scott vetoes bill to end permanent alimony,” 5/2/13). His veto letter implicitly lies by suggesting that a half-century of Family Law and Family Court Practice has been a level playing field where both men and women have been treated equally, fairly, and that when men signed permanent alimony agreements they did so of their own free will and free of any duress. Anyone familiar with Family Court Practice knows that this lie is as bald faced as Scott himself.
Well… it works this way in Florida. Even though our legislature unanimously voted in support of alimony reform there were a few women and a bunch of family law attorneys who make gazillions of dollars from the present system. So I vetoed it.
Gordon E. Finley, Ph.D.
Scott also wrote “Current Florida law already provides for the adjustment of alimony under the proper circumstances.” Were one to fact-check this direct quote from his veto letter, one would obtain a score of zero out of one hundred. Permanent alimony — which Scott favors — really is permanent and ends only with the death of one spouse. It is virtually impossible to modify permanent alimony no matter if you have Alzheimer’s disease or your income drops substantially or to zero. Pay or Gov. Scott will send a man (but never a woman) to debtor’s prison.
Gov. Scott is so desperate to get the “woman’s vote” that he is willing to wage a war on men and prey on men who already have been preyed upon by an unjust Family Court System.
I hope that his wife divorces him and takes him for every penny he’s got.
Perhaps then, and only then, will he understand that Family Law — which he so fervently embraces — really is a war On men.
Scott vetoes bill to end permanent alimony
TALLAHASSEE (AP) — Gov. Rick Scott vetoed a bill late Wednesday that would have ended permanent alimony in Florida.
Scott vetoed the measure (SB 718) just four hours before the midnight deadline to approve or veto it. The bill automatically would have become law if Scott had done nothing by then.
If it had become law, Florida would have become the fifth state to abolish permanent alimony.
In a letter to Senate President Don Gaetz, Scott commended bill sponsors Ritch Workman in the House and Kelli Stargel in the Senate — both Republicans — and said there are “several forward looking elements of this bill.”
But alimony “represents an important remedy for our judiciary to use in providing support to families as they adjust to changes in life circumstances,” Scott wrote. “As a husband, father and grandfather, I understand the vital importance of family.”
Scott could not “support this legislation because it applies retroactively and thus tampers with the settled economic expectations of many Floridians who have experienced divorce,” he wrote. “The retroactive adjustment of alimony could result in unfair, unanticipated results.”
Florida law “already provides for the adjustment of alimony under the proper circumstances,” Scott wrote. “The law also ensures that spouses who have sacrificed their careers to raise a family do not suffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned their lives accordingly.”
The proposed law also would have set limits on the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support from an ex-spouse.
The bill would have made it harder to get alimony in short-term marriages. And it would have prevented alimony payments from lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.
It also would have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children absent extraordinary circumstances.
“I’m actually surprised,” said Jason Marks, a divorce attorney in Miami, about the veto. The bill had passed the House 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. The Senate approved it 29-11.
“My assumption is, you haven’t heard the last of it,” Marks said. “Most family law practitioners will agree that uniformity in determination of alimony is a good thing.”
The bill said that in a short-term marriage, defined as less than 11 years, the assumption is that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony were granted, it would not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse’s gross income.
For marriages that last between 11 and 20 years, there’s no assumption either way in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than 35 percent of the ex-spouse’s gross income.
And in marriages longer than 20 years, there was an assumption in favor of alimony, though not more than 38 percent of an ex-spouse’s gross income.
Moreover, the bill did not automatically end alimony when the paying ex-spouse retired, but that person could have asked a judge to reduce the payment or even end it. The judge could have considered age at retirement, ability to pay alimony and the financial situation of the person receiving alimony.
Alimony reforms are needed yesterday.
Lifetime alimony is a lucky lottery draw that pays forever for doing nothing.
OPEN
PRESS DAY IN
MONMOUTH COUNTY FAMILY COURT
Friday,
June 7th, 2013 at 8:00 a.m.
Come
Witness a Protected Mobster, Blatant Corruption, Abused Children, and a
Disrespected, Exploited Mother All In One Spot
Come
One, Come All and
See What Family Court Is Really Like
(AND
TEN DOLLARS THE COURT RESCHEDULES THE COURT HEARING TO KEEP THE PRESS OUT SINCE
1500 REPORTERS ARE ON THIS EMAIL BLAST)
Patricia
Pisciotti's motion seeking the return of custody of her three children will be
heard on Friday, June 7th before Judge Justus in Monmouth County NJ. Disgraced Judge Escandon granted Mobster Nicholas
Pisciotti custody despite just being released from prison and his refusal to
continue in the Federal Witness Protection Program. Pisciotti confessed to
killing one man, brutally beating another and a slew of other crimes while a
member of organized crime. He testified against the head of an organized crime
family and several others to avoid serving 40 years in prison. In Federal Court
he admitted that there were known hits on his life, yet he cares so little
about his children that he puts them in danger daily. Come see Monmouth County
Family Court in all it's glory. This
will be the first time the courtroom is open.
Families
Civil Liberties Union - www.fclu.org - Copyright
© 2013 FCLU, All rights reserved. - Our
mailing address is: - FCLU - PO BOX 1011 New
York, NY 10036
If it had become law, Florida would have become the fifth state to abolish permanent alimony.
Florida law “already provides for the adjustment of alimony under the proper circumstances,” Scott wrote. “The law also ensures that spouses who have sacrificed their careers to raise a family do not suffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned their lives accordingly.”
It also would have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children absent extraordinary circumstances.
For marriages that last between 11 and 20 years, there’s no assumption either way in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than 35 percent of the ex-spouse’s gross income.
And in marriages longer than 20 years, there was an assumption in favor of alimony, though not more than 38 percent of an ex-spouse’s gross income.
Patricia
Pisciotti's motion seeking the return of custody of her three children will be
heard on Friday, June 7th before Judge Justus in Monmouth County NJ. Disgraced Judge Escandon granted Mobster Nicholas
Pisciotti custody despite just being released from prison and his refusal to
continue in the Federal Witness Protection Program. Pisciotti confessed to
killing one man, brutally beating another and a slew of other crimes while a
member of organized crime. He testified against the head of an organized crime
family and several others to avoid serving 40 years in prison. In Federal Court
he admitted that there were known hits on his life, yet he cares so little
about his children that he puts them in danger daily. Come see Monmouth County
Family Court in all it's glory. This
will be the first time the courtroom is open.
IT IS LARGELY FATHERHOOD WHICH MAKES CHILDHOOD POSSIBLE
I would like to express a very important concept today. This is extremely bold and progressive. I believe their is no ‘movements’ in the world today to change the opinion of culture in the way that will actually build up momentum. I would like to give you an example. (the example is not aimed to defame or harm homosexual couples in any way, simply a random example.)
I would like to express a very important concept today.
A large portion of Society will back gay rights to have two males or two females raise a child... Will Society recognize the human rights of a Male parent to have ABSOLUTE EQUALITY in custody decisions or family court?
