JUNE 3, 2014 UPDATE:
CLICK THE LINK: https://vimeo.com/97268399
WARNO FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRO:
RALLY IN KENTUCKY NEAR THE TENNESSEE BORDER ...
MC's
VSO's
LEO's
ALL WARFIGHTERS AND THOSE OF THE WARRIOR CLASS READY TO FIGHT. SMARTLY
"WE GIVE NO QUARTER TO THE CORRUPT"
Watch video and wait for more details. Get started now.
All the way, Boone
CLICK THE LINK: https://vimeo.com/97268399
WARNO FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRO:
RALLY IN KENTUCKY NEAR THE TENNESSEE BORDER ...
MC's
VSO's
LEO's
ALL WARFIGHTERS AND THOSE OF THE WARRIOR CLASS READY TO FIGHT. SMARTLY
"WE GIVE NO QUARTER TO THE CORRUPT"
Watch video and wait for more details. Get started now.
All the way, Boone
JOIN THE WARFIGHTER RIGHTS' MOVEMENT from Warrior Pointe VP on Vimeo.
an alienated parent and child desperately trying to maintain a meaningful relationship ~ C/O Stand Up For Zoraya
ReplyDelete“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…”
Delete~ Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.
Our Mission
1. Enable pro se litigants and fight to protect their rights and interests.
2. Raise public awareness that constitutional rights are not guaranteed and pinpoint the three major reasons average citizens are denied rights.
a. Judicial Corruption and Incompetence
b. Lawyer Corruption and Incompetence
c. Flaws in the design of the Judicial System
3. Hold lawyers and judges personally accountable when they betray public trust.
4. Correct the picture that the corrupt elements of our justice system have painted of pro se litigants.
a. We are not ignorant. Many of us have advanced degrees and understand the law better than those licensed to practice it.
b. We are not crazy.
c. We are not anti-government.
d. We are American Citizens, many who have served our country, and we are merely seeking what our Constitution purports to guarantee -- Liberty and Justice For All!
Florida Judge & Lawyer Complaints
How to file complaints against Florida Family Law Judges and Family Law Lawyers?
Each State has its own procedures for filing complaints against Judges. All states require a written and signed complaint. Some states have a form for you to fill out. Other States request a letter. Grievances of misconduct usually concern issues of conflict of interest or impartiality. Adverse rulings or judgments are not considered legitimate grievances. You must support the complaint to the JQC about the Florida Family Law Judge with sufficient documentation.
Florida Family Law Judge Complaints
Write to the Florida Judicial Qualifications Committee.
http://www.floridasupremecourt.org
Florida Family Law Judicial Complaint
Mailing Address
Judicial Qualifications Committee (JQC)
1110 Thomasville Road
Tallahassee, FL 32303
Telephone
850-488-1581
All states maintain an agency to process lawyer complaints. These disciplinary counsels can usually be found as a department of the state bar association or as a branch of the state Supreme Court. Complaints in Florida can be filed by filling out a form supplied by the disciplinary counsel or by writing a letter to The Florida Bar.
Florida Family Law Lawyer Complaints
The Florida Bar handles complaints about family law lawyers in Florida.
Mailing Address
The Florida Bar
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300
Telephone
850-561-5600
We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.
Delete*Sign the Petition* *Donate* *Volunteer* *Learn More* *View Online* *Aug. 26, 2014* *Members Fuel Fight to Save Parental Rights* They’re after our kids – the judges, the bureaucrats, the internationalists, the big government elites – and they seem to think they can make better decisions for our children than we can. And they know – they *know* – that if they can shape the hearts and minds of this next generation, there will soon be no one left to resist them at all. *The only thing stopping them is you. *Your constitutional right to direct the up... http://afrafrontpagenews.blogspot.com/2014/08/members-fuel-fight-to-save-parental.html
Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."
ReplyDeleteBrotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.
Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."
Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."
Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).
Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.