Pages

▼

Stand Up For Zoraya

▼

Monday

Desperately Trying To Maintain Meaningful Relationship - #StandupforZoraya

Mom testified (with her lawyer from Greenberg, whatever, whatever law firm) to Honorable Judge Valarie Manno-Schurr, on November 4th, 2014, that Zoraya was scared of her Dad.

Cover photo

Does this look like a little girl that is scared of her Dad?

Posted by Children's Rights on Saturday, July 25, 2015




It is the public policy of Florida to assure each minor child frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have separated or divorced, and to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing. The father is given the same consideration as the mother in determining time-sharing regardless of their child’s age, sex, or other factors.

STOPPING ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN FAMILY COURTS ELIMINATES COURT-ORDERED PARENTAL ALIENATION
  • Deny telephone contact with dad when the children are with you: This relates back to the earlier topic on alienation of affection but may not always be as obvious. Even if you have limited time with a child such as a couple hours a week, you must allow that child to call dad when requested.In addition, if he calls to check on the child you need to be polite and allow him to talk to the child unless that would cause disruption or the child is sleeping. Keep in mind that such calls from dad must be reasonable. Children should feel free to communicate with either parent at any time. If the mother denies you contact with your children when you call, be sure to keep a journal of the dates and times so the court may address it if it becomes a problem.



Stand Up For Zoraya
Prentice Powell "Good Father" on Arsenio Hall Show
PINTEREST

Post by Leaving Footprints The Good Bad and small print of the Family Court System.




STOP THE HEARTBREAK JUDGE MANNO-SCHURR ~~ 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court... http://bit.ly/1VBlVaG
Posted by David Inguanzo on Monday, October 5, 2015

Happy Birthday Zoraya!Stand Up For Zoraya
Posted by David Inguanzo on Sunday, August 2, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, October 5, 2015

3 comments:

  1. Christopher PearsallDecember 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM

    Comment to Post on Google+ - https://plus.google.com/116061457887918669052/posts/5SdjHZrq7XZ
    Christopher Pearsall - "+Howard Taft Thank you for this share. This is by far the best share I have seen. As a man who has not seen his daughters in many years due to circumstances that spiraled out of my control and I can only hope one day that my daughters will remember that I did this for them, that I gave up everything for them so they would not go without, relegating myself to living on the floor of a room in a kind blind woman's house with nothing but a a few changes of clothes and my duffelbag as my pillow. I'd do it all again for them....in a heartbeat. Even without our children, we still remain, we still ache, we still love them . . . we are the many, and proud... WE ARE FATHERS!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Parent RightsDecember 21, 2014 at 4:50 PM

    "I have worked hard to expose the corruption behind the family court system. Too many families are being destroyed for the benefit of money. Title4-D is an example of judges gaining profits from non-custodian parents via child support. This campaign isn't limited to child support of Title4-D but all other manipulative tactics that the feminism movement and agencies use to destroy fathers." ~ Parent Rights - https://www.causes.com/profiles/188892068
    Campaign Leader's reason to Stop Fond du Lac Family Court Corruption (Sally Anne Danner)
    https://www.causes.com/posts/938535

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownJanuary 22, 2015 at 8:33 AM

    Stop Emotional Child Abuse @ Family Courthouse -Miami-Dade - Tort Remedies For Interference With Parenting Time-
    "The case of Raftery v. Scott, 756 F. 2d 335 (4th Cir. 1985), a diversity action, involved an appeal by a custodial parent from a decision awarding the non-custodial parent damages of $50,000 ($40,000 compensatory damages and $10,000 punitive damages) pertaining to a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The claim stated that by preventing the non-custodial parent from exercising Parenting Time rights, the custodial parent attempted to destroy the parent-child relationship.
    The situation surrounding the claim was that the non-custodial parent was without knowledge as to the child’s whereabouts for four years and during that time the custodial parent had convinced the child that it should no longer see the non-custodial parent. Due to these circumstances, a medical health clinical director recommended that the non-custodial parent _no longer have Parenting Time because of the emotional impact it has on the child._ Id. at 337. The Court found that the facts independently supported a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and upheld the lower court decision." -
    ‪#‎StandupforZorara‬ - www.facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

    ReplyDelete