tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post1350385391449246203..comments2023-11-05T07:15:30.624-05:00Comments on Children's Rights: No uses a tu hijo como una arma de combateAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03418797959663152247noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-47720287860987696312013-12-21T17:03:23.890-05:002013-12-21T17:03:23.890-05:00“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you...“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to Redress Inc.http://www.zoominfo.com/s/#!search/profile/company?companyId=75022870&targetid=profilenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-77138010165288643472013-12-21T16:54:45.293-05:002013-12-21T16:54:45.293-05:00Intimidation of Pro-Se Litigants
The attitude of c...Intimidation of Pro-Se Litigants<br />The attitude of court officers toward pro-se litigants ranges from condescending to openly hostile, and when pro se's oppose an experienced attorney, they are often dispatched before having the opportunity to properly present their case. In the following article, investigative reporter Sherman Skolnick describes a scenario he has witnessed.<br /><br />BigTulanehttp://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/intimidation_05a.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-20003436222618684252013-12-21T16:39:05.868-05:002013-12-21T16:39:05.868-05:00PRO SE RIGHTS:
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia...PRO SE RIGHTS:<br />Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.<br /><br />Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do Steve Gartinhttp://stevegartin.com/redress.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-29200007701151118062013-12-21T16:27:08.888-05:002013-12-21T16:27:08.888-05:00"CHILDREN OF DIVORCE DESERVE FULL ACCESS TO B..."CHILDREN OF DIVORCE DESERVE FULL ACCESS TO BOTH PARENTS, WHENEVER POSSIBLE."<br />Personally, I can’t find anyone willing to reject that statement publicly. It’s a fundamental truth. We now have a wealth of evidence demonstrating children are better off, in most situations, when they have something near equal time with each parent. So why are shared-parenting bills are being rejected American Coalition for Fathers and Childrenhttp://www.acfc.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-55172207192244620662013-12-21T16:10:18.627-05:002013-12-21T16:10:18.627-05:00FLORIDA TODAY - OPINION
Written by Gordon E. Finle...FLORIDA TODAY - OPINION<br />Written by Gordon E. Finley, Ph.D., Miami<br /><br />While I applaud columnist Paul Flemming for a sound review of the issues in Saturday’s “Alimony bill will be great — for lawyers,” his bottom-line conclusion is dead wrong.<br /><br />The proposed state alimony reform bill will reduce litigation, not increase litigation. A bit of history: For years, the divorce Florida Todayhttp://www.floridatoday.com/article/20130417/OPINION/130416004/Letter-Columnist-s-conclusion-alimony-bill-wrong?gcheck=1noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-64747160554802127622013-09-24T16:54:58.967-04:002013-09-24T16:54:58.967-04:00HOW DID CHILDREN OF DIVORCE GET STUCK WITH THE VIS...HOW DID CHILDREN OF DIVORCE GET STUCK WITH THE VISITATION PLAN THAT AFFORDS THEM ACCESS TO THEIR NON-RESIDENTIAL PARENT ONLY ONE NIGHT DURING THE WEEK AND EVERY OTHER WEEK-END?<br /><br />What is the research that supports such a schedule? Where is the data that confirms that such a plan is in the best interest of the child?<br /><br />Well, reader, you can spend your time from now until eternityEnd Parental Alienationhttp://endparentalalienation.com/noreply@blogger.com