tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post66558890592196616..comments2023-11-05T07:15:30.624-05:00Comments on Children's Rights: Disparate Treatment of Pro Se LitigantsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03418797959663152247noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-10322689775930120442013-12-31T19:46:11.101-05:002013-12-31T19:46:11.101-05:00PRO SE RIGHTS:
Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~...PRO SE RIGHTS:<br />Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."<br /><br />Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.<br /><br />Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. Steve Gartinhttp://stevegartin.com/redress.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-2253160849439891812013-12-08T12:01:23.838-05:002013-12-08T12:01:23.838-05:00Review from the late Carl Fredrich, founder of the...Review from the late Carl Fredrich, founder of the American Pro Se Association<br />2012 ~<br />" "How to Win a Lawsuit Without Hiring a Lawyer" is a very informative book -- and for those who find themselves in certain circumstances it can be said to be indispensable. The book might be more appropriately entitled: "Pursuing A Lawsuit Without A Lawyer: Even Against the American Pro Se Associationhttp://associations.uslegal.com/american-pro-se-association/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-86059848686772179162013-09-20T14:47:44.021-04:002013-09-20T14:47:44.021-04:00In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyer...In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.<br />In 1933, elected officials and the alleged "country" have been given to the United Nations Government system. Under Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-12449780620231814162013-09-20T14:46:39.013-04:002013-09-20T14:46:39.013-04:00Dear Dads,
While the NH BAR ASSOCIATION is raping ...Dear Dads,<br />While the NH BAR ASSOCIATION is raping families, robbing Social Security through TITLE IV-D fraud, concealing the real hidden meaning of the marriage license, violating contract law, violating trust law, committing perjury, perpetrating and coercing fraud, stealing kids from fit moms and dads, refusing to enforce "court orders," and basically sponging off society, on Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-10668071758771560382013-06-17T09:48:29.181-04:002013-06-17T09:48:29.181-04:00I guess you couldn't handle me ha Barry? Sorry...I guess you couldn't handle me ha Barry? Sorry you paid so much money for that law degree. Your parents wasted their money son!<br /><br />No case authoritative within this circuit, however, had held that the state had a comparable obligation to protect children from their own parents, and we now know that the obligation does not exist in constitutional law.” K.H. Through Murphy v. Morgan, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-26492393083719442982013-06-16T19:10:05.429-04:002013-06-16T19:10:05.429-04:00The children's act took away our rights & ...The children's act took away our rights & gave us responsibilities instead.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-90219318529332320602013-06-16T13:47:26.839-04:002013-06-16T13:47:26.839-04:00Grandparents are also entitled to procedural due p...Grandparents are also entitled to procedural due process. “An essential principle of due process is that a deprivation of life, liberty, or property ‘be preceded by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-76920582687572585702013-06-16T13:46:40.568-04:002013-06-16T13:46:40.568-04:00The rights of parents to parent-child relationship...The rights of parents to parent-child relationships are recognized and upheld. Fantony v. Fantony, 122 A 2d 593, (1956); Brennan v. Brennan, 454 A 2d 901, (1982). State’s power to legislate, adjudicate and administer all aspects of family law, including determinations of custodial; and visitation rights, is subject to scrutiny by federal judiciary within reach of due process and/or equal Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-26579933105172734252013-06-16T13:45:43.839-04:002013-06-16T13:45:43.839-04:00The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Cal...The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (California) held that the parent-child relationship is a constitutionally protected liberty interest. (See; Declaration of Independence –life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution — No state can deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor deny any person the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-21435723465234115202013-06-16T13:44:29.642-04:002013-06-16T13:44:29.642-04:00Even when blood relationships are strained, parent...Even when blood relationships are strained, parents retain vital interest in preventing irretrievable destruction of their family life; if anything, persons faced with forced dissolution of their parental rights have more critical need for procedural protections than do those resisting state intervention into ongoing family affairs. Santosky v. Kramer, 102 S Ct 1388; 455 US 745, (1982).<br /><br Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-72131013629556878472013-06-16T13:43:12.598-04:002013-06-16T13:43:12.598-04:00We also have Unalienable Rights – Absolute Rights ...We also have Unalienable Rights – Absolute Rights – Natural Rights<br /><br />The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable. Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356.<br /><br />By the “Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3220124406269088228.post-7543028086713393552013-06-16T13:39:32.155-04:002013-06-16T13:39:32.155-04:00In controversies affecting the custody of an infan...In controversies affecting the custody of an infant, the interest and welfare of the child is the primary and controlling question by which the court must be guided. This rule is based upon the theory that the state must perpetuate itself, and good citizenship is essential to that end. Though nature gives to parents the right to the custody of their own children, and such right is scarcely less Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com