Dear Honorable Chief Judge Bertila Soto,
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the handling of Mr. David Inguanzo’s case (Case No. 2008-029595-FC17) and the treatment he has received in the courtroom.
I am specifically troubled by the tone and conduct directed toward Mr. Inguanzo by Circuit Court Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr, as reflected in the official court transcripts. Mr. Inguanzo has consistently maintained that he has been the victim of false statements, including a documented false report made by Ms. Nixa Rose to a Miami-Dade Police Officer, an act that constitutes a felony under Florida law. The court’s apparent lack of acknowledgment of these concerns raises serious questions about fairness, impartiality, and due process.
In light of these issues, I respectfully request the following:
-
That Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr recuse herself from further involvement in Mr. Inguanzo’s proceedings to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the judicial process.
-
That the Court evaluate her continued role as Presiding Judge of the Family Division, given the gravity of the concerns raised.
-
That Mr. Inguanzo be immediately reunited with his daughter, Zoraya Inguanzo, through an order restoring normal and reasonable timesharing consistent with Florida law and the child’s best interests.
These requests are made in the hope of restoring confidence in the fairness of the proceedings and ensuring that all parties—especially the child—are treated with justice, dignity, and respect.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
David Inguanzo
STOP Denial of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact #StandUpForZoraya - PETITION
The Cause "Stand Up For Zoraya" celebrates the love fathers have for their daughters, inspiring them to embrace the important role they hold in their daughters' lives and to provide the love, nurture, and emotional support that only they can give. www.causes.com/campaigns/44302-stand-up-for-zoraya
STOP COPYING HERE:
Please send your emails to all of the following: 1. Chief Judge Bertila Soto, c/o: 2.Xxxx Xxxxxx, State Court Administrative Office, c/o: info@courts.FL.gov 3.letters@MiamiHerald.com 4. Call To Action: YourNewsStation@wxyz.com 5. Call To Action: Newspaper Editorials YourNewspaper@wxyz.com
Find Court Qualified "Supervised Visitation Monitor" - Once a week (for one hour) in Miami-Dade or Broward County. As Ordered by Judge Manno-Schurr on February 2nd, 2015. WILL PAY - Contact Stuart H. Abramson, Attorney at Law at (305) 270-7796
Obtain a Pro-Bono Guardian Ad Litem (GAL). See a photo of Dad's Motion for GAL Appointment filed by dad and denied by Judge Scott Silverman.
www.causes.com/actions/1779107-sign-the-petition-to-florida-11th-judicial-circuit-chief-honorable-judge-soto
Dad initially (on 12/4/2008) petitioned the court for three things: 1. Pay Child Support 2. Shared Parental Responsibility and 3. Normal and reasonable Time-sharing. On July 8th, 2010 Dad was granted by Judge Maria Espinosa Dennis: 1. Child Support 2. Shared Parental Responsibility Judge Dennis stated in the Final Judgment that "Normal and reasonable time-sharing", like the one dad has with his son since 2004 from his divorce, will be granted upon absolute compliance with all items listed in Paragraph number 29 of the Final Judgment.
Dad has been in Family Court compliance since October of 2010.
www.causes.com/posts/958464-did-you-complete-your-pledge
PICTURE: Zoraya and David - Sister and Brother Separated by Judge Manno-Schurr for NO REASON!!!
www.causes.com/posts/957950-help-david-inguanzo-find-a-qualified-monitor-lmft-lcsw-or-dr-of-psych-etc-to-facilitate-supervised-visitation-with-his-daughter-zoraya
Judge Manno-Schurr It is in the child's best interests that contact and visits be restored SWIFTLY and FULLY11th Judicial Circuit Family Court - Inguanzo vs. Rose 08-29595 - Began: 10/27/20082012 -
Linda J Gottlieb LMFT LCSW -
Resumption of Visits ~
It is in the child's best interests that contact and visits with the alienated parent be restored SWIFTLY and FULLY once the suspended contact was determined to be the result of unfounded DV allegations and/or because the alienating parent had unilaterally prevented the contact.
One of the more pernicious and destructive alienating maneuvers is the leveling of false abuse allegations against the targeted parent.
This emotional form of child abuse is by the alienating by a parent, then the traumatic results are equal to those of children who actually had suffered abused.
Exacerbating the damage, such allegations generally lead to the immediate suspension of all contact between the child and the targeted parent during the ensuing investigation. Not only is contact missed, it allows for the poisoning to continue with no possibility for the antidote of the meaningful contact between the child and the targeted parent. Furthering the damage to the child of the suspended contact, the alienating parent invariably informs the child that she/he has been abandoned by the targeted parent!
Paving the way for the resumption of visits and contact. Oh, really? Not so fast. This rarely happens because the alienating parent declares to the child's attorney (Liar Greenberg) and to the family court that the child is too afraid to have contact resumed with the targeted parent; and naturally these sentiments are validated by the brainwashed puppet child.
So the attorney for the child and the attorney for the alienating parent recommend the very slow resumption of contact----generally slower than watching grass grow. Some attorneys for the targeted parent have conveyed to me that this situation places them in a double-blind: if they ask for normal resumption of contact, the judge may deny everything. So frequently, the attorney for the targeted parent has little choice but to agree to the resumption of contact at a snail's pace and sometimes supervised.
www.standupforzoraya.wordpress.com/
THIS IS THE WORST POSSIBLE SOLUTION!
Amber Dawn ~
