Operation Family Law~CPS Reform
Letter Campaign
In all indications of the talk out of the legislative bodies, 2017 will be the year of reform of the social programs of Child Welfare Divisions. Although funded by the Federal Government, each State and county will have their own policies and procedures drafted around the new legislative actions in 2017. The new bills could be the means for some states to adopt a 'family friendly' policy of helping families to remain together, and some states will cling to their standard practice of seizing kids for federal dollars. The only way to end the incentivized profit gain off children is to end ASFAct. We encourage all writers to demand this end to ASFA.
In the year of 2017, the group will decide how to restructure our efforts to change the current justice system of Family law/dissolution and custody. As family law in relation to child custody, child support, is a federal justice problem, our need to write legislative bodys will end our refocus will be on addressing the justice system and the avenues available to bring a change, whereas prior change to the Child welfare divisions focused on a social program and policy change and not a justice system change.
For the following months of 2016, we encourage you to write to those legislative representatives on committees whose task will be in the reform of the Child welfare social programs not seen since 1980. We can say, this will be the last year you will be able to have a voice if reform occurs this year. Once the reform is put into place, there will be little our efforts will be able to do to change it for a good deal of time as the legislative body will put it aside and allow the new changes to develop. So be a strong voice in 2017...reform is coming!
MISSION STATEMENT.
Our purpose is to provide formatted letters to send to State and Federal Offices in the Unites States. We ask that you join, click going to show you support the movement. We ask members to not make personal statements or comments. This is a site to retrieve copy and paste letters to email to your representatives. Please add into the body of the letters your own personal information before sending. We will be adding letters through out the remainder of the year to send to all representatives in our fifty states. We will begin with the states that have current outrageous headlines of cps abuse or family court abuse. We ask all American Citizens to send their letters and ask for a full reform of these two branches of government.
Please see also Operation CPS reform and Family law reform groups and page.1. Operation CPS reform and Family Law reform page will feature current cases of cps abuse and family law abuse.
2. Operation CPS reform and family law reform group page will feature like minded groups and their rallies /events
3. Operation CPS reform and Family Law reform ; letter campaign event page will feature formatted letters to send to government officials.
We hope we will all join together to make a difference for all Americans.
In all this, it can only be a success if many Americans come together to move this forward. This is the only way, many voices become one. Please be sure to always make a strong statement of your losses in these two agencies at the end of each letter.
Organized by: Sherry Palmer
In all this, it can only be a success if many Americans come together to move this forward. This is the only way, many voices become one. Please be sure to always make a strong statement of your losses in these two agencies at the end of each letter.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buy a shirt and fund the attorney we just found in Florida to argue |
Declaratory Judgment and destroy the unconstitutional practices in family courts
FixFamilyCourts.com - Self-Help for Self-Representation in Family Courts
The declaratory judgment is the same path that the gays used recently to get same-sex marriage heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and the same path that Roe v. Wade used to be heard as well. Parents throughout the United States have met denials of certifying their family court grievances at the U.S. Supreme Court level in mass numbers recently, so we at www.fixfamilycourts.com developed argument to re-open those gates. We welcome you to this effort and look forward to having the same success as the recent gay movement.
Great news for the declaratory judgment that Ron B Palmer and I, Sherry Palmer, have been working on. We finally have an...Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015From Tanya Morrow (a mother who has had to suffer a year without seeing her children and then being subjected to...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015Prayers and well wishes needed for this alienated father. He found out that his daughter had been arrested for the...
Divorce Your Spouse NOT Your ChildGreat news for the declaratory judgment that Ron B Palmer and I, Sherry Palmer, have been working on. We finally have an...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Monday, August 24, 2015Join other family law reform activists meeting on Broadway and Colfax in Denver to protest at the Colorado State Capitol this Saturday, August 22 from noon to 4 pm. Bring your own sign.
Posted by Divorce Corp. on Friday, August 21, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Channel 8 WTNH Investigative Reporter David Iversen will have his first report of a series regarding Connecticut's GAL system. The second report of the series will be airing at 6pm on Friday, October 2nd.Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Wednesday, October 28, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015https://www.causes.com/posts/965024
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Bad Judges and Lawyers Reporting page Do not re-elect bad Family Court Judges
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Good Lawyers and Judges Reporting Page
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015http://iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com/2015/10/children-lost-in-divorce.html
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Monday, October 26, 2015
PRO SE RIGHTS:
ReplyDeleteSims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.
Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."
Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."
Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).
Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."