PETITION - Florida Family Court Miami-Dade STOP Denial of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact #StandUpForZoraya - PETITION
COPY THE FOLLOWING:
Dear Honorable Chief Judge Bertila Soto:I am disturbed about the injustice perpetrated on Mr. David inguanzo. I am further disturbed about the anger directed at this innocent man by Circuit Court Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr, captured on court transcripts, and her complete lack of sympathy for a man who is the proven victim of lies, including a lie by Ms. Nixa Rose to a Miami-Dade Police Officer, which is a felony in the State of Florida.
I demand that: Judge Manno-Schurr recuse herself from Mr. Inguanzo’s case (Case Number: 2008-029595-FC17). And that she be demoted from her post as Presiding Judge of the Family Division of the Eleventh Judicial Court of Florida. And that Mr. Inguanzo be reunited with Zoraya Inguanzo WITH an ORDER allowing "Normal and Reasonable Timesharing" IMMEDIATELY.Respectfully submitted, [Put in Your Name] [Put in Your State of Residence]
Please send your emails to all of the following: 1. Chief Judge Bertila Soto, c/o: 2.Xxxx Xxxxxx, State Court Administrative Office, c/o: info@courts.FL.gov 3.letters@MiamiHerald.com 4. Call To Action: YourNewsStation@wxyz.com 5. Call To Action: Newspaper Editorials YourNewspaper@wxyz.com
Find Court Qualified "Supervised Visitation Monitor" - Once a week (for one hour) in Miami-Dade or Broward County. As Ordered by Judge Manno-Schurr on February 2nd, 2015. WILL PAY - Contact Stuart H. Abramson, Attorney at Law at (305) 270-7796
Obtain a Pro-Bono Guardian Ad Litem (GAL). See a photo of Dad's Motion for GAL Appointment filed by dad and denied by Judge Scott Silverman.
Dad initially (on 12/4/2008) petitioned the court for three things: 1. Pay Child Support 2. Shared Parental Responsibility and 3. Normal and reasonable Time-sharing. On July 8th, 2010 Dad was granted by Judge Maria Espinosa Dennis: 1. Child Support 2. Shared Parental Responsibility Judge Dennis stated in the Final Judgment that "Normal and reasonable time-sharing", like the one dad has with his son since 2004 from his divorce, will be granted upon absolute compliance with all items listed in Paragraph number 29 of the Final Judgment.
Dad has been in Family Court compliance since October of 2010.
PICTURE: Zoraya and David - Sister and Brother Separated by Judge Manno-Schurr for NO REASON!!!
No Contact for Daughter and Father. No Reason Needed - Judge Manno-Schurr. ~~ #StandupforZoraya ~~
Judge Manno-Schurr It is in the child's best interests that contact and visits be restored SWIFTLY and FULLY11th Judicial Circuit Family Court - Inguanzo vs. Rose 08-29595 - Began: 10/27/20082012 -
Linda J Gottlieb LMFT LCSW -
Resumption of Visits ~
It is in the child's best interests that contact and visits with the alienated parent be restored SWIFTLY and FULLY once the suspended contact was determined to be the result of unfounded DV allegations and/or because the alienating parent had unilaterally prevented the contact.
One of the more pernicious and destructive alienating maneuvers is the leveling of false abuse allegations against the targeted parent.
This emotional form of child abuse is by the alienating by a parent, then the traumatic results are equal to those of children who actually had suffered abused.
Exacerbating the damage, such allegations generally lead to the immediate suspension of all contact between the child and the targeted parent during the ensuing investigation. Not only is contact missed, it allows for the poisoning to continue with no possibility for the antidote of the meaningful contact between the child and the targeted parent. Furthering the damage to the child of the suspended contact, the alienating parent invariably informs the child that she/he has been abandoned by the targeted parent!
Paving the way for the resumption of visits and contact. Oh, really? Not so fast. This rarely happens because the alienating parent declares to the child's attorney (Liar Greenberg) and to the family court that the child is too afraid to have contact resumed with the targeted parent; and naturally these sentiments are validated by the brainwashed puppet child.
So the attorney for the child and the attorney for the alienating parent recommend the very slow resumption of contact----generally slower than watching grass grow. Some attorneys for the targeted parent have conveyed to me that this situation places them in a double-blind: if they ask for normal resumption of contact, the judge may deny everything. So frequently, the attorney for the targeted parent has little choice but to agree to the resumption of contact at a snail's pace and sometimes supervised.
THIS IS THE WORST POSSIBLE SOLUTION!