Dear Media, Government, and Society

Operation Family Law~CPS Reform

 Letter Campaign

In all indications of the talk out of the legislative bodies, 2017 will be the year of reform of the social programs of Child Welfare Divisions. Although funded by the Federal Government, each State and county will have their own policies and procedures drafted around the new legislative actions in 2017. The new bills could be the means for some states to adopt a 'family friendly' policy of helping families to remain together, and some states will cling to their standard practice of seizing kids for federal dollars. The only way to end the incentivized profit gain off children is to end ASFAct. We encourage all writers to demand this end to ASFA. 

In the year of 2017, the group will decide how to restructure our efforts to change the current justice system of Family law/dissolution and custody. As family law in relation to child custody, child support, is a federal justice problem, our need to write legislative bodys will end our refocus will be on addressing the justice system and the avenues available to bring a change, whereas prior change to the Child welfare divisions focused on a social program and policy change and not a justice system change.

For the following months of 2016, we encourage you to write to those legislative representatives on committees whose task will be in the reform of the Child welfare social programs not seen since 1980. We can say, this will be the last year you will be able to have a voice if reform occurs this year. Once the reform is put into place, there will be little our efforts will be able to do to change it for a good deal of time as the legislative body will put it aside and allow the new changes to develop. So be a strong voice in 2017...reform is coming!


Our purpose is to provide formatted letters to send to State and Federal Offices in the Unites States. We ask that you join, click going to show you support the movement. We ask members to not make personal statements or comments. This is a site to retrieve copy and paste letters to email to your representatives. Please add into the body of the letters your own personal information before sending. We will be adding letters through out the remainder of the year to send to all representatives in our fifty states. We will begin with the states that have current outrageous headlines of cps abuse or family court abuse. We ask all American Citizens to send their letters and ask for a full reform of these two branches of government.

Please see also Operation CPS reform and Family law reform groups and page.
1. Operation CPS reform and Family Law reform page will feature current cases of cps abuse and family law abuse.
2. Operation CPS reform and family law reform group page will feature like minded groups and their rallies /events
3. Operation CPS reform and Family Law reform ; letter campaign event page will feature formatted letters to send to government officials. 
We hope we will all join together to make a difference for all Americans.
In all this, it can only be a success if many Americans come together to move this forward. This is the only way, many voices become one. Please be sure to always make a strong statement of your losses in these two agencies at the end of each letter.


Operation CPS reform and Family law reform ; Letter Campaign..




To the office of Loretta Lynch
We submit to the office of the U.S. Department of Justice the following list of Child welfare division Case workers, Supervisors and employees in and effort to inform, report and submit the Crimes against the American people and the unconstitutional removals of children from the familial units supported by the Federal standard of placement with Kin as priority. 

We demand an investigation into the practices of State operated Child welfare divisions as a Human trafficking program as defined for the purposes and definition of Human trafficking legislation, as ‘ Human trafficking can occur within a country or trans-nationally. Human trafficking is a crime against the person because of the violation of the victim's rights of movement through coercion and because of their commercial exploitation.

Human trafficking is the trade in people, and does not necessarily involve the movement of the person from one place to another.” “the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.”

Under the Clinton Administration, the following legislation was adopted under a cash incentive to the states to remove children for adoption, as; The legislation also would provide cash bonuses to states that increase their adoptions, giving them $4,000 for each child adopted above the previous year's number and $6,000 for each adoption of a child who is older or has some physical or emotional disability.

The transfer of children into the foster system has become a human trafficking program as shown by the facts and definitions put forth by the United Nations Global Initiative to fight Human Trafficking. The states have shown to be acting in the best interests of state revenue and not on the safety and well being of Families of the United States.

We submit an overview of our research and campaign to reform the Child Welfare Divisions and list of submitted Child Welfare Employees who have conducted un-constitutional removals of children from familial units for the sole intent of trafficking children for Federal incentives and financial gains for State revenue. We demand an investigation and reform.

State Operated Child Protection Services

Supportive and conclusive evidence of criminal arrests of Child Welfare Caseworkers, Supervisors, Foster Parents, Directors of Youth Facilities, Adoptive Parents, and affiliated associates of the processes of Child Abuse procedures provides a clear outline of criminal activities within the internal operations of local, city, state and federal employees.

Each crime listed is supported through public records, articles and arrests of actual occurrences within the nation. 

The extensive crimes against the Parents and Children, financially and psychologically, have been extensively studied with ample resources available to understand the depth of damage and harm done to this population of people who have fallen victim to;
Internal Corruption, Improper training, Low Standard for Hiring and Minimal Background checks under the office of Child Protection Service.

In securing the safety of children, our most vulnerable citizens, the system has failed to uphold strict requirement of the offices given the power to take legal ‘custody’ or ‘possession’ of a child from biological parents, family, and extended family. These qualifications to meet all expectations of the child abuse workers should be extended beyond the current requirements, to include;

Routine Drug checks for CPS employees, Psychological evaluations for CPS employees, Home Evaluations of CPS employees, Conflict of Interest penalty (Caseworkers acting as Foster and Adoptive Parents, Adoption Broker), Standard College Law License and Degree, Standard Psychologist License and Degree, Standard General Practitioner License and Degree, Cultural and Humanities Study and Law Enforcement Training.

These strict requirements are necessary, and /or, the very same measures for which Parents are held to account and expected to perform to gain reunification with their children. And in some cases, with all programs and requires fulfilled, families are denied reunification with biological children, nieces, nephews, cousins, brothers and sisters. As the program requires this strict obligation of the American Citizens, so to, should the public servants acting on behalf of government programs, paid for by the American taxpayers, be obliged to the same standard.

While it is believed, these requirements will reduce the internal corrupted individuals within the government and state programs designed to aid children, it is only adding increased costs and inefficiency of state budgets stretched beyond their capabilities in their current structure and the national cost of the programs under the Department of Children and Families. The current model of child protection is outdated in the current technology and innovations of communications, reporting and investigating. We have seen no better professional skill in addressing child exploitation than the work performed by Missing and Exploited Children, Protect, ICAC and state task forces specially trained in crimes against children. The task enforcement teams designated for child abuse investigations are under staffed with only five or six investigators for the populace our largest cities.

We propose a restructure of the Child Protection Federal Funds into the Divisions of Law Enforcement divisions of Investigations into Crimes against children by specialized trained Investigators with access to full discovery, forensics, medical and mental experts for prosecutions of crimes against children, in conjunction with, trained psychologists to determine placement of children with biological family and resources to refer families of low income into programs designed to provide basic needs to improve living conditions, drug addictions, disability assistance, medical and mental health assistance

299. Donna Bener - former Cullman Alabama, Florida

JimDillon - Pinellas co. Florida
Sarah Pierce - Pinellas co. Florida
Keri Fischer- Lee County Florida
Mary Wilburn - Jackson co. Florida
LauraLeonard – Florida
Shannon Federer(aka Nichols, aka Hutchinson, aka Slessor)
Heather Hewitt (cps investigator)
Melissa Crawford
CPS Supervisor Stephanie Reinhard
Rob Watson, Scarlett Lunning
Phyllis Howard, Polk Co. CASA worker
Mary Wilburn - Jackson county Marianna, Florida
Annette Sellars - Jackson county Marianna, Florida
Cindy Louise Packer Monroe County, FL
Susan Glancy (DCF prosecutor) Monroe County, FL
Tiffany DaSilva (Wesley House supervisor) Monroe county, FL

Your message to the Department of Justice | DOJ | Department of Justice

Messages to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be submitted via this for...

No More Jim Crow Family Courts - Defeating one state at a time! shirt design - zoomed

Buy a shirt and fund the attorney we just found in Florida to argue 

Organized by: Sherry Palmer

Declaratory Judgment and destroy the unconstitutional practices in family courts

The money raised in this booster will go towards helping each state file a declaratory judgment to stop the unconstitutional practices in the family courts. The first portion of this month's campaign will be designated for the filing fees in Sarasota, Florida. If there are overages the extra will go into the nonprofit "Keeping Families Intact." Wear one of these shirts proudly knowing that you are part of the solution!
Parents have been struggling far too long through the family courts. Both the parents and children are being abused and taken advantage of. It is too expensive and difficult for parents to fight this. And the time it takes to fight it causes the destruction of their relationships with their children, has cost many their health as well as some their lives. - Self-Help for Self-Representation in Family Courts

The declaratory judgment is the same path that the gays used recently to get same-sex marriage heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and the same path that Roe v. Wade used to be heard as well. Parents throughout the United States have met denials of certifying their family court grievances at the U.S. Supreme Court level in mass numbers recently, so we at developed argument to re-open those gates. We welcome you to this effort and look forward to having the same success as the recent gay movement. 
Great news for the declaratory judgment that Ron B Palmer and I, Sherry Palmer, have been working on. We finally have an...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015From Tanya Morrow (a mother who has had to suffer a year without seeing her children and then being subjected to...
Posted by Children's Rights on Monday, August 24, 2015Prayers and well wishes needed for this alienated father. He found out that his daughter had been arrested for the...

Divorce Your Spouse NOT Your ChildGreat news for the declaratory judgment that Ron B Palmer and I, Sherry Palmer, have been working on. We finally have an...

Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Monday, August 24, 2015Join other family law reform activists meeting on Broadway and Colfax in Denver to protest at the Colorado State Capitol this Saturday, August 22 from noon to 4 pm. Bring your own sign.
Channel 8 WTNH Investigative Reporter David Iversen will have his first report of a series regarding Connecticut's GAL system. The second report of the series will be airing at 6pm on Friday, October 2nd.
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Bad Judges and Lawyers Reporting page Do not re-elect bad Family Court Judges
Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Posted by Childrens Rights Florida on Tuesday, October 27, 2015Good Lawyers and Judges Reporting Page

1 comment:

    Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."

    Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.

    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.

    Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."

    Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."

    Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.

    Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."

    Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.

    Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."

    NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."

    Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."

    Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).

    Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."

    Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."

    Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."


Take Action Now!

Children's Rights Florida

Florida Family Law Reform

Family Law Community

Search This Blog

American Coalition for Fathers and Children

Means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.

Abuse (7) Abuse of power (1) Abuse of process (5) Admission to practice law (3) Adversarial system (83) Advocacy group (3) African American (1) Alienator (1) Alimony (7) All Pro Dad (1) All rights reserved (1) Allegation (2) Alliance for Justice (2) American Civil Liberties Union (3) American Psychological Association (1) Americans (2) Anecdotal evidence (2) Anti-discrimination law (1) Arrest (1) Bar association (1) Best interests (42) Bill (law) (1) British Psychological Society (1) Broward County (1) Broward County Public Schools (2) Brown University (1) Catholic Church (1) Center for Public Integrity (2) Chief judge (26) Child Abuse (48) Child custody (78) Child development (6) Child neglect (2) Child protection (15) Child Protective Services (19) Child Support (64) Children (3) Children's Rights (83) Christine Lagarde (1) Christmas (3) Circuit court (3) Civil and political rights (14) Civil law (common law) (1) Civil liberties (9) Civil Rights (145) Civil rights movement (1) Class action (1) Communist Party of Cuba (1) Confidentiality (1) Constitutional law (1) Constitutional right (5) Contact (law) (11) Contempt of court (4) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (1) Coparenting (28) Copyright (1) Copyright infringement (1) Corruption (1) Court Enabled PAS (92) Court order (2) Cuba (1) Cuban Missile Crisis (1) Cuban Revolution (1) Custodial Parent (1) Declaratory judgment (3) Denial of Reasonable Parent-Child Contact (110) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2) Divorce (124) Divorce Corp (6) Divorce Court (1) Documentary (25) Domestic Violence (51) Dr. Stephen Baskerville (5) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1) DSM-5 (1) DSM-IV Codes (1) Due Process (45) Due Process Clause (1) Dwyane Wade (1) Easter (1) Equal-time rule (2) Ethics (1) Events (10) Exposé (group) (1) Facebook (19) Fair use (1) False accusation (4) False Accusations (57) Family (1) Family (biology) (2) Family Court (198) Family Law (113) Family Law Reform (119) Family Rights (87) Family therapy (10) Father (12) Father figure (2) Father's Day (1) Father's Rights (12) Fatherhood (106) Fatherlessness Epidemic (4) Fathers 4 Justice (3) Fathers' rights movement (46) Fidel Castro (1) Florida (214) Florida Attorney General (7) Florida Circuit Courts (19) florida lawyers (30) Florida Legislature (6) Florida Senate (11) Foster care (1) Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1) Fraud (1) Free Speech (1) Freedom of speech (1) Frivolous litigation (1) Fundamental rights (12) Gainesville (1) Gender equality (1) Government Accountability Project (2) Government interest (2) Grandparent (3) Havana (1) Healthy Children (14) Human Rights (119) Human rights commission (1) I Love My Daughter (56) I Love My Son (8) Injunction (1) Innocence Project (1) Investigative journalism (1) Jason Patric (2) JavaScript (1) Joint custody (8) Joint custody (United States) (16) Judge (5) Judge Judy (7) Judge Manno-Schurr (55) Judicial Accountability (103) Judicial Immunity (7) Judicial misconduct (8) Judicial Reform (3) Judicial Watch (2) Judiciary (3) Jury trial (1) Kids for cash scandal (1) Law (2) Lawsuit (9) Lawyer (8) Legal Abuse (150) Liar Joel Greenberg (16) Linda Gottlieb (1) Litigant in person (1) Little Havana (1) Marriage (6) Matt O'Connor (1) Men's rights movement (1) Mental disorder (1) Mental health (2) Meyer v. Nebraska (1) Miami (44) Miami-Dade County (8) Miami-Dade County Public Schools (1) Miscarriage of justice (42) Mother (4) Motion of no confidence (1) Movie (4) Music (8) Nancy Schaefer (1) National Fatherhood Initiative (1) Natural and legal rights (1) News (89) Nixa Maria Rose (16) Non-governmental organization (1) Noncustodial parent (4) Organizations (60) Palm Beach County (1) Parent (35) Parental Alienation (116) Parental alienation syndrome (15) Parental Rights (36) Parenting (12) Parenting plan (6) Parenting time (7) Parents' rights movement (38) Paternity (law) (1) Personal Story (22) Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1) Pope (1) Posttraumatic stress disorder (27) President of Cuba (1) Pro Se (30) Pro se legal representation in the United States (3) Prosecutor (1) Protest (1) Psychological manipulation (1) Psychologist (1) Public accommodations (1) Public Awareness (108) Raúl Castro (1) Re-Post/Re-Blog (12) Research (1) Restraining order (4) Rick Scott (12) Second-class citizen (1) Self Representation-Pro Se (31) Sexism (1) Sexual abuse (2) Sexual assault (1) Shared Parenting (92) Single parent (6) Skinner v. Oklahoma (1) Social Issues (59) Social Media (1) Spanish (8) Stand Up For Zoraya (47) State school (1) Student (1) Supreme Court of Florida (8) Supreme Court of the United States (5) Tampa (1) Testimony (23) Thanksgiving (2) The Florida Bar (10) The Good Men Project (1) Trauma (4) Troxel v. Granville (2) True Story (21) Turner v. Rogers (1) United States (26) United States Congress (1) United States Constitution (1) United States Department of Justice (4) Videos (51) Violence Against Women Act (1) Whistle-blower (3)