Reckless Disregard

Post-traumatic Stress in the Rupture of Parent-child

Please stop the unfair punishment of good fathers. We need reform now! | Petition2Congress

March 12, 2016
Dear President Obama:
Dear Representative Diaz-Balart:
Dear Senator Nelson:
Dear Senator Rubio:
Dear Governor Scott:
I am a divorced FIT Father of a boy (from marriage) and a girl (unwed DNA proven bio-dad).
I have no problem paying child support as proven by my payment records.
That is until the Miami-Dade County 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court destroyed my life, and caused negligent infliction of severe emotional distress which has caused a "medically documented" injury by a Complex Sub-category of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. In a nutshell I fear the Family Court. Additionally, I am the victim of medical malpractice by Psychiatrist Dr. Carter who has a case pending against him by the Florida Department of Health.
Reluctantly I filed for disability in 2010 and still have not prevailed despite the work of Social Security Advocates Binder and Binder. I had to filed bankruptcy in 2010; but that is typical (and statistically proven by the movie Divorce Corp released in Jan 2014) of anyone that has to fight in America's Family Courts.

Answer this simple question:
Why does the Broward County FL 17th Judicial Circuit Family Court have absolutely no concern (nor does his mom), since 2002 to today, to be in my son's life with joint custody?
Recently I appeared before Judge Dale C. Cohen on my motion requesting a continuance on contempt proceedings so I could take my son to the Pacific Northwest for a month during the summer. Honorable Judge Cohen said, "have a good time".
Thereby establishing my parental fitness.
And the Florida 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court denies any access (visitation/timesharing) with me, my son (her brother), my family to my daughter?? My daughter could've traveled with her brother and dad to see Mount Rainier, go to a Pow Wow, learned about Lewis and Clark, and so many things...
Zoraya would've loved it!!

All this happen when I did the right thing and hired a lawyer to file a Petition for Paternity  (Right to Parent my daughter). Case No. 2008-029595 began on December 4th, 2008. It continues today.
chance-to-be-a-dad-2015As of today the Florida 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court denies any access (visitation / timesharing)  with me, my son (her brother), my family to my daughter??  WHY???
This is Emotional Child Abuse...plain, simple, AND ESTABLISHED.

The case 2008-029595 of the Florida 11th Judicial Circuit is proof of Civil and Human Rights Violations. Not even the Department of Children and Families will respond to my plea to help me stop the proven emotional child abuse of my daughter Zoraya. Please help her or please help me to help her...I beg you!

David - Hialeah, FL 33012-3864

In June of 2004 my son's mom and I got divorced. I have known my son's mom since 1992.

I have known my daughter's mom since 1990 and we dated until 1994. In November of 2004 she contacted me and we reunited, dated, and lived together beginning in January of 2005. Our daughter was born in 2006.

We got engaged in Paris in October 2007. We broke up in June 2008 and I moved out. I focused on my work, my children, and family. As a District Sales Manager for a Multi-National Company I had to travel internationally every week between Mondays and Fridays. I only had the weekend for my children.

As we were still friends I was able to have normal time-sharing with our daughter (by mutual agreement) during the weekends that is until October 5th, 2008 (our daughter's 2nd birthday).

After spending a "family" day out (Mom, Dad, my son David, and our daughter Zoraya) celebrating Zoraya's birthday, mom tells me that "since she didn't need 'her' father Zoraya doesn't need me". Those words I will never forget.

After Zoraya's birthday, as promised, mom began to deny me any visit with our daughter. Mom served me with a Temporary Restraining Order on the 2nd week of October. During the DV hearing on October 27th, that mom and I attended without lawyers, mom and I admitted to Honorable Judge Cohn that "there were never any acts of domestic violence since we've known each other" and mom answered "no" when the Judge asked her if she felt I was a danger to her and or our daughter.

Honorable Judge Don S. Cohn denied and dismissed mom's petition stating "No Just Cause". The Judge never addressed how I was going to see our daughter leaving me in limbo and afraid of mom.

Mom's Manipulation of Family Court Judges

I was with my daughter on November 1st, 2008 when her mom dropped her off at the hospital to visit me. My sister met mom in the lobby and brought Zoraya to my hospital room. Also present was my mom, dad, son, his mom and step dad, and my sister's husband.

In December of 2008 I filed my initial Petition, A Paternity Suit. I paid an Attorney a $3,000 fee/retainer. I asked for 3 things; to pay Child Support, Shared Parental Responsibility, and normal and reasonable Time-sharing.

Then from the 2nd week in November until February 18th I was able to spend a little time with my daughter at the day care that we enrolled her in since she was three months old and which was 50 yards from my parents home. I only visited my daughter at the day care center so I could avoid her mom so she wouldn't make any further false allegations against me.

On February 8th our new Judge, Honorable Judge Dennis, ordered mom and I to Family Court Services for Alienation Intervention, Co-Parenting, Family Counseling and Time-sharing Issues.

But then on February 18th mom filed another Temporary (DV) Restraining Order with the help of her new lawyer. Mom and lawyer planned this from December 18th, 2008.

Mom fabricated and lied to Miami-Dade Police Officers on December 18th, 2008 to obtain an "information-only" police report as evidence in the upcoming Domestic Violence hearing they had planned to file. Filing false allegations on their petition and alleging an act of domestic violence that never happen but reported on an information only police report at the Miami-Dade Police Department in the Town of Miami Lakes on December 18th, 2008 is a crime according to Judge Dennis.

What was their motive? Was it retaliation, vengeance, anger, and/or all of the above??

Maybe it is because on December 16th, 2008, two days before mom made false allegations to Miami-Dade Police Officers, Honorable Judge Scott Bernstein ordered mom NOT to remove our daughter from Miami-Dade County and to DNA testing in an Emergency Hearing that my Attorney (Beatriz Cera) requested.

And the Restraining Order relieved mom from having to comply with Judge Dennis' Orders to both mom and dad to report to Family Court Services for Alienation Intervention, Co-Parenting and Time-sharing Issues Counseling.

I did not get a hearing until April 3rd on mom's February 18th Petition for the Restraining Order. During that hearing I told Judge Brennan (former DV Judge) the same thing the mom and I told the Honorable Judge Cohn on October 27th; “that there have never been any acts of domestic violence between mom and me".

In addition I brought a witness that swore that I was not anywhere near the location listed on an "information only" police report (that mom obtained December 18, 2008) with a fabricated incident of which I had no knowledge. It was admitted as evidence by Judge Brennan.

Judge Brennan unjustifiably ordered a one-year "No Contact" Restraining Order. I complained telling Judge Brennan that "I felt that not being able to see my daughter was unfair and that it was equivalent to court-ordered child abuse by parental alienation" A prediction that has become reality.

As I was saying this Judge Brennan angrily closed the hearing and began to leave the courtroom and that is when I placed an envelope containing a Notice of Unavailability in the paternity case (a legal document) on the opposing party's table in front of mom in the courtroom. Judge Brennan, alerted by mom's attorney, immediately returned to the bench and called us back to our places and without even checking the envelope Judge Brennan said I violated the just-issued restraining order and ordered me to 26-week batterers' intervention course.

One year after our first hearing before Judge Cohn I was terminated from my job due to the (1) Excessive Court Orders; I requested time-off so I could comply with the court's orders in order to be able be with my daughter. And (2) the other reason, well lets put it this way; Do you have any idea how devastating it feels when people (mom, her lawyer, bad judge), acting under the color of law, hold your children hostage while the huge railroad train called the judicial system runs you over? Then wondering every second of the day if your child is safe? 

It is torture for those parents who CARE about their kids and I know MOST of you readers are caring, loving parents. I know because I have met them in the programs you shoved down my throat.

Child abuser in Black Robe - DivorceCorp - 2016

In December of 2009 Judge Dennis finally allowed me to see my daughter when she ordered "Temporary"  Supervised Visitation at the day care center until I complied with her and Judge Brennan's orders.

After two full days of trial in December 2009 and February 2010 the Final Judgment finally arrived on July 2010. As I petitioned, the Final Judgment basically states that I will pay child support and have Shared Parental Responsibility.

BUT...On the Time-sharing Issue Judge Dennis states in the Final Judgment’s Paragraph 31 that I would get "normal and reasonable" Time-sharing with my daughter once I complied with "all" the Honorable Court's Orders to me to attend co-parenting, batters' intervention, and so forth.

No problem in being with my son because his mom knows and has admitted to this Court that I am a good father, family man, and hard worker.

Please review the public court records at the Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center (33128) to see the excessive, abusive, and Unconstitutional Court Orders and the Court's Requirements preventing me from being the involved father that I want to be, because she is part of my "life", and therefore I have the "liberty" to be with my children and have a father-daughter relationship, and most importantly it makes her, my son/her brother, and me very "happy". 

Deprivation of rights under color of law falls under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242. This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States.

I AM an important part of my daughter's life. Judges and lawyers come and go but I and all Dads are always going to be right there for their kids.

So, I have "completely and absolutely" complied with ALL of the Court's Orders.

The 8 Page Final Judgment clearly states that I am a "FIT" parent...see for yourself.

There’s absolutely no mention whatsoever that I am or have ever been an "at-risk" Parent. There is the mention of the false domestic violence incident and restraining order...all false as aforesaid.

And if I was an "at-risk" parent then how come my time-sharing with my son, which is liberal, unhampered and unfettered since my separation/divorce in 2002, is not and/or has never ever been interrupted or challenged?

Just because I fall into the "UN-wed biological father" classification of the state's laws is not a good enough excuse to take away my daughter's father.

My daughter is now 6 and despite this long court case, thousands of dollars of legal fees on both sides and injury to my daughter nothing much has changed. Yesterday I gazed out the window watching fireworks and was really missing my angel but I cannot call her because I am scared of her mom’s false allegations and lies, she doesn't call me and knowing she is only a couple of mile away hurts like hell.

My ex-fiancée has hurt me for years on end and she seems relentless in erasing me from our daughter’s life and I am reduced to nothing more than a broken-hearted dad that battles on for justice in the courts, so that someone will make my ex encourage our daughter to see me as an equal parent and let me be a part of her life, good times and bad.

I have a lot to give and a lot to teach her but the only people she gets to see is her mothers’ friends and family, not a true representation of her whole family, which to me is abuse and falls under the title of parental alienation. This is the act of one parent trying to stop meaningful contact with the other parent.

It is time to stand up and make family laws fairer to stop child abuse being carried out and to promote shared parenting in the family courts.

I have begun the 3rd round of my family court case. My case number is 2008-029595 in the 11th Judicial Circuit in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

They, the "opposing party" (I hate to use that description), have complained to the Court that I have filed 3 Petitions; the initial Petition in the Paternity Suit and 2 follow-up Petitions for Modification. That is correct...and so what?? Obviously it is within my rights to file a petition in a family court case if and when there's a substantial change(s). And there are!!

They, the opposing party and the Courts, should know by now that I will never give up on my daughter AND that I will file as many Petitions for Modification as needed. Do they really think I am going give up or that the Court is going to order me to stop the fight for my daughter to have a normal relationship with her Father?

They should be worrying about other things such as their "r e c k l e s s d i s r e g a r d" for how they have handled themselves throughout this case and the injury they've caused Zoraya and me.

A Family Court Services Report regarding the 12 supervised visits dated January 29th, 2013 states:

"After greeting, Mr. Inguanzo immediately engaged Zoraya in conversation and play. Father and daughter discussed different topics such as school, science, books, a trip to France, physical education, Zoraya's older brother, and other relatives, holidays, etc.

Mr. Inguanzo also practiced speaking Spanish with Zoraya. Mr. Inguanzo frequently demonstrated physical affection, to which Zoraya allowed and reciprocated. Mr. Inguanzo displayed behaviors indicative of being nurturing patient, and attentive to Zoraya's needs.

Zoraya appeared to enjoy her father's company. Zoraya and her father displayed a very good level of interaction." This report is written by Ms. Laura Escober, L.C.S.W. based on her observation and the observation of Ms. Maria Puentes, M.S.W. and Mr. Rafael Castro, Ph.D.

I have not seen and or spoken with Zoraya since January 24th, 2015.

This is how the "system" has failed my daughter Zoraya and this is how this blog was born. There's more to come so please stay tuned and please pray (for Zoraya's sake) that the Courts will finally realize how the opposing party has purposefully and intentionally interfered "in reckless disregard" with a child's relationship with her father and that the Court will make the "right and only" last decision that needs to be made in this family court case. That Zoraya can have her dad back!

KNOW THIS: Much of what I have enjoyed most in life is being threatened by reprehensible governmental actions. Those in government “elected” or appointed to represent our best interests: yours, mine, and those of all our families, are not acting within their powers to protect and preserve our GOD-Given unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Many are undeniably doing the opposite.

#StandUpForZoraya #ILoveAndNeedMyDaughter #EndParentalAlienation

In pursuit of what is true, right, and just
Family court is designed by its makers to be probably the most dangerous life event parents and children can endure. It enables and profits from every inhumane instinct known to man—greed, hate, resentment, fear—resulting in abundant cash flow for the divorce industry and a fallout of parent and children’s misery.
And behind the curtain of this machine of misery we’ve uncovered its cause—the multi-billion dollar divorce industry, populated by judges, attorneys, and a machinery of tax-dollar fed “judicial administrators,” social workers that George Orwell would marvel at.
We’ve been delivering that message kindly for years now, yet the tide keeps rising on families in crisis. We’ve appealed to the county courts, state and local politicians, state judicial oversight bodies, United States Representatives, and just plain old human dignity, but the harassment and abuse of parents and children has only increased. A resort to federal court intervention in the widespread criminal collusion in state government was the next logical step.

It’s time to recognize Family Court for what it is—a corporate crime ring raiding parents and children of financial and psychological well-being, and devouring our children’s futures. And its not just divorce lawyers—its judges, “judicial administrators,” psychologists, cops and prosecutors—people we should be able to trust—in a modern day criminal cabal using county courtrooms and sheriff’s deputies as the machinery of organized crime.

Since state officials’ hands are too deep into the cookie jar to stop their own abuse, we’re seeking the assistance of federal oversight.

The present-day suffering of so many parents and children has and is being wrought within a larger system characterized by a widespread institutional failure of—indeed contempt for—the rule of law.

Family courts, the legal community, professional institutions such as the state bar, psychology boards, and criminal justice institutions have in the recent decade gradually combined to cultivate a joint enterprise forum in which widespread “family practice” exceptions to the rule of law are not only tolerated, but increasingly encouraged. Professional behavior that would only a few years ago be recognized as unethical, illegal, or otherwise intolerable by American legal, psychological, law enforcement, or social work professionals has increasingly achieved acceptance—indeed applause—from institutional interests which benefit from a joint enterprise enforcing the unwritten law of “who you know is more important than what you know.

In this lawless behavior’s most crass infestation, Family Court Judges are regularly heard to announce, in open court, “I am the law” and proceed to act accordingly with impunity, indifference, and without shame.

The effect on parents and children seeking social support within this coalescing “family law” forum has not been as advertised by courts and professionals—a new healing—but instead a new affliction: an ‘imposed disability’ of de rigueur deprivation of fundamental rights in the name of ‘therapeutic jurisprudence’ funded by converting college funds into a bloated ministry of the Bar Associations leaving families and their children with mere crumbs of their own success.

Many family court judges regularly administer such obnoxious ‘renegade’ justice every day, in open defiance of the rule of law. ‘Sober as a judge’ these days has a whole new meaning.
Family Courts, including judges, blame “Litigants Behaving Badly” for harms enabled—indeed largely manufactured—by the Domestic Dispute Industry’s own longstanding predatory commercial practices.

Their “Litigants Behaving Badly” theme is part of the self-delusional propaganda engaged in by so many [divorce industry] members who, rather than recognizing the harm their industry enables and “healing themselves”, instead blame their own clients, who, quite true, do regularly abuse process, their loved ones, and even themselves—in perfect compliance with [divorce industry] instructions.

Divorce lawyers illegally conspire with judges to steal from parents as part of a racketeering criminal enterprise—and brings over 30 claims of federally-indictable crime.
“Civil rights violations, fraud, and obstruction of justice are federal crimes—even for judges.

Lawsuit seeks to hold judges and courts personally responsible for overseeing the crime committed by the attorneys and social workers in their courtroom. Judges have a legal and ethical duty to ‘ensure rights’ under the judicial canons of conduct. It’s just not possible that intelligent lawyers like judges don’t understand exactly what goes on in their courtrooms, yet they allow it to continue.

This judicial collusion is far more serious crime than even the fraud of divorce attorneys themselves.

We need reform toward a more humane family dispute resolution solution. They’ve treated us as enemies of the state. When we thought we’d be welcomed, or at least heard, we’ve instead become targets of prosecution and terrorist threats. They've assaulted us, harassed our members including threatening “gun cock” and death threat late night phone calls, attacked our businesses, professional licenses, and threatened to jail and extort us with further crime.

It’s outrageous that our own government allows this to happen, and we’re asking the federal court to protect our members as we pursue the civil and criminal charges against the courts. A complete set of filings and exhibits is available from CCFC’s Facebook page at

We seek to promote the health and success of all families–parents and children equally and alike. We perceive that parents and children presently lack effective and independent advocates within government and the civil and criminal justice system, and as such their rights and interests are regularly compromised in favor of the institutionalized interests of others, including government, private attorneys and professional service providers, and the enormous domestic dispute industry.
We're organizing, officers, and affiliates are professionals dedicated to improving social, governmental, and justice system processes concerning domestic relations, child rearing, parenting, constitutional law, child custody, and domestic violence.

Many of our members are mothers, fathers, and children who have withstood abundant hardship resulting from the current practices of what is generally described as the “Family Law Community.”

These injuries and insults include fraudulent, inefficient, harmful, and even dangerous services; an institutionalized culture of indifference to “clearly-established” liberties; insults to the autonomy and dignity of parents and children; extortion, robbery, abuse, and more, delivered at the hands of eager operators within the divorce industry. Florida Department of Revenue and Child Support Enforcement

Any law which stops us from acting according to a "well formed" conscience is immoral. Is it any wonder parents and children unjustly separated find it one of the most painful and disruptive experiences of their lives?

While it is difficult to compare Civil Rights; what would you find more disturbing: being told to sit in the back of the bus, not being allowed to vote, or ordered to no longer hug the child you love

Fit parents should decide what's in the best interest of their child. Some think a distinction should be made between good, average, and poor parents. But how can we make a single determination in a multifaceted and dynamic relationship? Like most of us I have mixed feelings about what my parents chose for me. Times I knew they made mistakes, times when I would have preferred one over the other. I saw our relationship change as I matured, but we all grew together as family through good times and bad.

Is Parenting A Civil Rights Issue?

The Impact of Parental Alienation on Parents


#StandUpForZoraya #ILoveAndNeedMyDaughter #EndParentalAlienation

“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…” Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.


A scathing expose of the fraud inherent in the use of "expert" psychological testimony in the courtroom.

From the high-profile murder trials of the Menendez brothers and Jeffrey Dahmer to personal injury, product liability and child custody cases, lawyers across the country have increasingly turned to "expert" testimony from psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers to influence the decisions of judges and juries.Psychologist Margaret Hagen, a professor and medical industry insider, details the very real danger of this booming business. In every state, a child can be taken away from a parent on the strength of five minutes of "neutral" testimony from a social worker. A criminal suspect's freedom or incarceration can depend on a superficial psychological examination performed by an incompetent, overworked, or, at worst, paid-off psychologist. Parole hearings hinge on the testimony of similarly incomplete or fraudulent evaluations, allowing "rehabilitated" violent criminals back onto the street to commit more heinous crimes, with no accountability for the reviewing "expert." Unmasking some legal psycho-expertise as a total fraud, Dr. Hagen instructs readers to protect themselves and their families from being victimized by psychological testimony in the courtroom. In today's frenzied legal climate, her insight and wisdom make for provocative, compelling and invaluable reading

"Few human rights abuses are so widely condemned, yet so widely practiced. Let us make (children a priority.

Florida Family Court Miami-Dade STOP Denial of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact - Stand Up For Zoraya"

Everyone was not only gratified to see PAAO at the event, they all also acknowledged that PA is either a form of Domestic violence or on the continuum of Domestic Violence behaviors.

I have not seen and or spoken with Zoraya since January 24th, 2015.

"Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty —never give in, except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy."

- Sir Winston Churchill

The three types of government and/or court behavior that constitute family legal abuse are: 

1.) Family legal abuse is the set of human rights violations that stem from an unethical, immoral, and unconstitutional presumption on the part of judges, attorneys, and legislators that one of the two parties in a divorce must necessarily be treated with inequality.

2.) Family legal abuse is the set of human rights violations that result when overzealous social worker agencies seize children from good homes.

3.) Family legal abuse is the set of human rights violations that result when paternity fraud is encouraged, condoned, and incentivized by courts and legislators.I hope these three definitions are helpful to you as we continue to spread awareness of this widespread American tragedy.

Reach me anytime

A scathing expose of the fraud inherent in the use of "expert" psychological testimony in the courtroom.

From the high-profile murder trials of the Menendez brothers and Jeffrey Dahmer to personal injury, product liability and child custody cases, lawyers across the country have increasingly turned to "expert" testimony from psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers to influence the decisions of judges and juries.

Psychologist Margaret Hagen, a professor and medical industry insider, details the very real danger of this booming business. In every state, a child can be taken away from a parent on the strength of five minutes of "neutral" testimony from a social worker. A criminal suspect's freedom or incarceration can depend on a superficial psychological examination performed by an incompetent, overworked, or, at worst, paid-off psychologist. Parole hearings hinge on the testimony of similarly incomplete or fraudulent evaluations, allowing "rehabilitated" violent criminals back onto the street to commit more heinous crimes, with no accountability for the reviewing "expert." Unmasking some legal psycho-expertise as a total fraud, Dr. Hagen instructs readers to protect themselves and their families from being victimized by psychological testimony in the courtroom. In today's frenzied legal climate, her insight and wisdom make for provocative, compelling and invaluable reading

Dr. Karin Huffer - Legal Abuse Syndrome »
Dr. Karin Huffer is the author of "Legal Abuse Syndrome"
 has had PTSD recognized and approved
 to allow special accommodations in the courts.
 Her work is phenomenal 

An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law"

 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.


"How can a guy do all that and yet the court does not allow him to see his children?" ~ Gerardo Silva, Jr., Florida Guardian Ad Litem, City Councilman, and more

As advised by lawyers, separating and/or divorcing parents often make false allegations of domestic violence (DV) in the form of a restraining order to evict an innocent parent from the home, interfere with contact with child/ren, and then file for temporary custody (virtually never temporary). False police reports are often obtained and used in DV Court...called "information only reports", but contain a fabricated incident of DV and thus a serious crime if and when exposed. 

GILL v. GILL. Daniel David GILL, Appellant, v. Krystal Ann GILL, Appellee. No. 2D09-2746. -- December 29, 2010.

FamilyLawInjustice XY ~ CORRUPTION at it's worst!

Lies are welcome and make the family courts money, that's why they believe everything you say - whoever lies first wins.

RADAR: Home Page  »

Despite the best of intentions, our nation's effort to curb domestic violence is not working. Current solutions not only fail to reduce domestic violence, but also create other severe problems. Families are being undermined and children harmed. Innocent Americans are penalized based on false allegations of domestic violence.

Remain an Equal Parent to your Child!
We only support organizations who show an understanding that children need both parents, and that either parent is equally capable of the choice to perpetrate hate or declare peace

"Reckless Disregard" A True And Compelling Story Of One "FIT" Father's Fight For His Daughter

The father's rights movement isn't an anti-mom or anti-woman movement; it's an anti-unfairness movement. Our aim is to champion the cause of equal parenting, family law reform and equal contact for divorced/separated parents with their children. The fathers' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children. Many of its members are fathers who desire to share the parenting of their children equally with their children's mother—either after divorce or as unwed fathers, and the children of the terminated marriage.

 The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law. Most of the members of the fathers' rights movement had little prior interest in the law or politics. However, as they felt that their goal of equal shared parenting was being frustrated by the family courts, many took an interest in family law, including child custody and child support.

7 Minutes to Bedtime: A Dad and Daughter’s PodcastRick Sanchez at The Good Men Project - 18 minutes agoIn an effort to hold a daily ‘good’ conversation with his daughter, Rick Sanchez utilizes the inexact time just before “lights out” where the most interesting conversations happen. The post 7 Minutes to Bedtime: A Dad and Daughter’s Podcast appeared first on The Good Men Project.3 Simple Ways to Show Your Son You Love HimKent Sanders at The Good Men Project - 18 minutes agoBeing a good father doesn't have to be complicated, but sometimes it goes against what we're taught makes us good men. The post 3 Simple Ways to Show Your Son You Love Him appeared first on The Good Men Project.Dad’s Hot Topic: Sorry Kids, Freedom of Speech is Not FreeBrian Gawlak at The Good Men Project - 1 hour agoIn a world where controversial 'Hot Topics' are abuzz, Brian Gawlak finds the teachable moments in trending issues. The post Dad’s Hot Topic: Sorry Kids, Freedom of Speech is Not Free appeared first on The Good Men Project.

STOP THE HEARTBREAK JUDGE MANNO-SCHURR ~~ 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court...
Posted by David Inguanzo on Monday, October 5, 2015
Happy Birthday Zoraya!Stand Up For Zoraya
Posted by David Inguanzo on Sunday, August 2, 2015

Take Action Now!

Google+ Followers

Children's Rights Florida

Florida Family Law Reform

Family Law Community

Search This Blog

American Coalition for Fathers and Children

Means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.

Abuse (7) Abuse of power (1) Abuse of process (5) Admission to practice law (3) Adversarial system (83) Advocacy group (3) African American (1) Alienator (1) Alimony (7) All Pro Dad (1) All rights reserved (1) Allegation (2) Alliance for Justice (2) American Civil Liberties Union (3) American Psychological Association (1) Americans (2) Anecdotal evidence (2) Anti-discrimination law (1) Arrest (1) Bar association (1) Best interests (42) Bill (law) (1) British Psychological Society (1) Broward County (1) Broward County Public Schools (2) Brown University (1) Catholic Church (1) Center for Public Integrity (2) Chief judge (26) Child Abuse (48) Child custody (78) Child development (6) Child neglect (2) Child protection (15) Child Protective Services (19) Child Support (64) Children (3) Children's Rights (83) Christine Lagarde (1) Christmas (3) Circuit court (3) Civil and political rights (14) Civil law (common law) (1) Civil liberties (9) Civil Rights (145) Civil rights movement (1) Class action (1) Communist Party of Cuba (1) Confidentiality (1) Constitutional law (1) Constitutional right (5) Contact (law) (11) Contempt of court (4) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (1) Coparenting (28) Copyright (1) Copyright infringement (1) Corruption (1) Court Enabled PAS (92) Court order (2) Cuba (1) Cuban Missile Crisis (1) Cuban Revolution (1) Custodial Parent (1) Declaratory judgment (3) Denial of Reasonable Parent-Child Contact (110) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2) Divorce (124) Divorce Corp (6) Divorce Court (1) Documentary (25) Domestic Violence (51) Dr. Stephen Baskerville (5) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1) DSM-5 (1) DSM-IV Codes (1) Due Process (45) Due Process Clause (1) Dwyane Wade (1) Easter (1) Equal-time rule (2) Ethics (1) Events (10) Exposé (group) (1) Facebook (19) Fair use (1) False accusation (4) False Accusations (57) Family (1) Family (biology) (2) Family Court (198) Family Law (113) Family Law Reform (119) Family Rights (87) Family therapy (10) Father (12) Father figure (2) Father's Day (1) Father's Rights (12) Fatherhood (106) Fatherlessness Epidemic (4) Fathers 4 Justice (3) Fathers' rights movement (46) Fidel Castro (1) Florida (214) Florida Attorney General (7) Florida Circuit Courts (19) florida lawyers (30) Florida Legislature (6) Florida Senate (11) Foster care (1) Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1) Fraud (1) Free Speech (1) Freedom of speech (1) Frivolous litigation (1) Fundamental rights (12) Gainesville (1) Gender equality (1) Government Accountability Project (2) Government interest (2) Grandparent (3) Havana (1) Healthy Children (14) Human Rights (119) Human rights commission (1) I Love My Daughter (56) I Love My Son (8) Injunction (1) Innocence Project (1) Investigative journalism (1) Jason Patric (2) JavaScript (1) Joint custody (8) Joint custody (United States) (16) Judge (5) Judge Judy (7) Judge Manno-Schurr (55) Judicial Accountability (103) Judicial Immunity (7) Judicial misconduct (8) Judicial Reform (3) Judicial Watch (2) Judiciary (3) Jury trial (1) Kids for cash scandal (1) Law (2) Lawsuit (9) Lawyer (8) Legal Abuse (150) Liar Joel Greenberg (16) Linda Gottlieb (1) Litigant in person (1) Little Havana (1) Marriage (6) Matt O'Connor (1) Men's rights movement (1) Mental disorder (1) Mental health (2) Meyer v. Nebraska (1) Miami (44) Miami-Dade County (8) Miami-Dade County Public Schools (1) Miscarriage of justice (42) Mother (4) Motion of no confidence (1) Movie (4) Music (8) Nancy Schaefer (1) National Fatherhood Initiative (1) Natural and legal rights (1) News (89) Nixa Maria Rose (16) Non-governmental organization (1) Noncustodial parent (4) Organizations (60) Palm Beach County (1) Parent (35) Parental Alienation (116) Parental alienation syndrome (15) Parental Rights (36) Parenting (12) Parenting plan (6) Parenting time (7) Parents' rights movement (38) Paternity (law) (1) Personal Story (22) Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1) Pope (1) Posttraumatic stress disorder (27) President of Cuba (1) Pro Se (30) Pro se legal representation in the United States (3) Prosecutor (1) Protest (1) Psychological manipulation (1) Psychologist (1) Public accommodations (1) Public Awareness (108) Raúl Castro (1) Re-Post/Re-Blog (12) Research (1) Restraining order (4) Rick Scott (12) Second-class citizen (1) Self Representation-Pro Se (31) Sexism (1) Sexual abuse (2) Sexual assault (1) Shared Parenting (92) Single parent (6) Skinner v. Oklahoma (1) Social Issues (59) Social Media (1) Spanish (8) Stand Up For Zoraya (47) State school (1) Student (1) Supreme Court of Florida (8) Supreme Court of the United States (5) Tampa (1) Testimony (23) Thanksgiving (2) The Florida Bar (10) The Good Men Project (1) Trauma (4) Troxel v. Granville (2) True Story (21) Turner v. Rogers (1) United States (26) United States Congress (1) United States Constitution (1) United States Department of Justice (4) Videos (51) Violence Against Women Act (1) Whistle-blower (3)