JUDICIAL BIAS – A Fine Balance

Judicial bias refers to a situation where a judge's personal opinions, beliefs, or prejudices influence their decision-making in a case, rather than relying solely on the law, the facts presented, and fair legal principles. In an ideal legal system, judges are expected to be impartial, making decisions based on the law and the facts of the case at hand, without favoritism or prejudice. When a judge allows their personal biases to influence their decisions, it undermines the fairness and integrity of the legal process.

Judicial bias can manifest in several ways:

1. Personal Bias: A judge may have personal beliefs or experiences that affect how they view a case. For example, a judge might show favoritism towards a particular gender, race, or social class in their rulings. In family law cases, this could mean favoring one parent over another due to gender-based assumptions about caregiving, even if the law doesn’t support such a preference.

2. Prejudgment: If a judge has already formed an opinion about a case or a party involved before hearing all the evidence, this can lead to biased decision-making. For example, if a judge is publicly critical of one side (like mothers, fathers, or certain groups of people) in similar cases, it could create an impression that their mind is already made up, influencing their impartiality.

3. Conflict of Interest: A judge might have a personal or financial interest in the outcome of a case, which can affect their neutrality. For instance, if a judge knows one of the attorneys personally or has a vested interest in a company or entity involved in the case, they may be more inclined to rule in a way that benefits that party.

4. Cultural or Social Bias: Judges may unintentionally bring their own cultural or social background into the courtroom, affecting how they view the parties involved in a case. For instance, they may give less weight to the testimony of a person from a lower socioeconomic background or show favoritism toward a particular lifestyle or belief system.

5. Inconsistent Rulings: If a judge applies different standards of judgment depending on the parties involved or the type of case (e.g., consistently ruling in favor of one gender or party in family law cases), that could be considered judicial bias.

Why Judicial Bias is Problematic

• Unfair Outcomes: Judicial bias undermines the idea of a fair trial. If a judge's decision is influenced by personal views or prejudices, the result may not be just or equitable.

• Loss of Public Trust: A judicial system that allows bias to affect its outcomes can erode the public’s confidence in the fairness and legitimacy of the law. If people believe that judges are not impartial, they may not respect the rulings or seek alternative means of resolving their disputes.

• Appeals and Reversals: Biased decisions can lead to appeals, which are costly and time-consuming. Higher courts may overturn decisions based on judicial bias, leading to delays and additional burdens on the legal system.

How Judicial Bias is Addressed

• Recusal: In cases where a judge has a conflict of interest or there is a concern about bias, they may recuse themselves (step aside) from the case to maintain fairness.

• Appellate Review: Higher courts review lower court decisions to ensure that bias or errors in judgment did not influence the ruling.

• Training and Ethical Guidelines: Judges are often required to undergo training on ethics, fairness, and bias. Many courts also have rules that prohibit judges from engaging in behavior that could lead to the appearance of bias.

Can Bias Be Avoided?

While it's impossible to completely eliminate personal influences, judges are held to high ethical standards and must avoid any conduct that would compromise their objectivity. Legal systems often have mechanisms like appeals, judicial review boards, and complaints processes in place to help address instances of bias.

In the context of family law, where emotions can run high (especially in divorce and custody disputes), there can be particular concerns about bias. For instance, if a judge has a bias towards mothers in custody cases, this could lead to unfair outcomes for fathers (or vice versa). Addressing this bias is crucial to ensuring that all parties receive equal treatment under the law.

Have you ever seen examples of judicial bias play out in real-world cases or media portrayals? How do you think courts could work to address this issue?

People also ask:

What is a biased judge?

bias. n. the predisposition of a judge, arbitrator, prospective juror, or anyone making a judicial decision, against or in favor of one of the parties or a class of persons. This can be shown by remarks, decisions contrary to fact, reason or law, or other unfair conduct.

Bias legal definition of bias - Legal Dictionary - The F

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/bias

Search for: What is a biased judge?

When a judge has a conflict of interest?

Recuse. To disqualify or remove oneself as a judge over a particular proceeding because of one's conflict of interest. Recusal, or the judge's act of disqualifying himself or herself from presiding over a proceeding, is based on the Maxim that judges are charged with a duty of impartiality in administering justice.

Recuse legal definition of recuse

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/recuse

Search for: When a judge has a conflict of interest?

What is actual bias?

Bias may be actual, imputed or apparent. Actual bias is established where it is actually established that a decision-maker was prejudiced in favour of or against a party. However, in practice, the making of such an allegation is rare as it is very hard to prove.

Natural justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_justice

Search for: What is actual bias?

What are the circumstances under which a judicial officer may be required to disqualify himself from proceedings?

Judicial disqualification, also referred to as recusal, refers to the act of abstaining from participation in an official action such as a legal proceeding due to a conflict of interest of the presiding court official or administrative officer.

Judicial disqualification - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_disqualification

Search for: What are the circumstances under which a judicial officer may be required to disqualify himself from proceedings?

Originally posted on Researching Reform:

The subject of judicial bias has always fascinated Researching Reform and in the family justice system, where discretion is not just an afterthought but a much-used tool, bias can be magnified and in turn can affect judgement.

Weaponized Family Court System,

"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice "
– U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).

← Should Judges Be Required To Pass Rigorous Tests? Poll #26

Obstruction Of Father/Son Relationship

COLLUSION OF DOJ WITH THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IN VIOLATION OF SEPERATION OF POWER

• Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprison of a Felony
• 2008-Opposition to the Appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General of DOJ
• 2008-Criminal Compalint for violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 4, 241, 242, 1513 etc.
• VIOLATION OF SEPARATION OF POWER BY THE COLLUSION OF THE VIRGINIA COURTS AND BOB McDONNELL
• OPEN LETTER TO MEMBERS OF THE U.S. SENATE
• FATHER'S/SON RIGHTS
• THE REASON FOR THE SUIT AND NOTICE OF FEDERAL TORT CLAIM
• CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, VIOLATED 18 U.S.C. SECS. 1001 & 1204
• Court of Appeals Confirms Duty to Protect Father's Rights Under Treaty
• PETITION FOR INVESTIGATION OF ABUSE OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
• RICO/Bivens and Federal Tort Complaint Against Judge J. G. Roberts et al.
• July 2005--Recent act by Judge J. G. Roberts and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
• August 2005 CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS INTENTIONAL FALSE STATEMENTS TO CONGRESS
• Exception to Judicial Immunity
• MISC. MATERIAL IN SUPPORT OF ACTION AGAINST JOHN G. ROBERTS
• 2005 Letter to Congress on Collusion of DOJ with Judicial Branch
• NEGLIGENCE OF NCMEC

False Allegations Hurt Children!

False Allegations Hurt Children!

“When you are falsely accused (and intentionally for that matter) the pain can be crippling at times. 

That aside; I wish people cared about what their false allegations would do to the children involved. Even with the pain I suffered and the meds I now have to take on a daily basis, I would have given my life to take my children’s pain and fear of being taken from me away.” — Sara

WHAT CONSTITUTES A FAMILY OFFENSE?

The criminal behavior which has been “civilized” by Family Court Act Article 8 is defined in the penal laws.

This is a crucial aspect to determine whether or not a family offense petition makes out a prima facia case, and is too often overlooked when defending against a family offense petition. Many practitioners look solely to whether or not the alleged actions occurred.

More importantly, a judge is supposed to look at whether or not the petitioner can prove all the necessary elements of the family offense alleged and defined in the penal laws.

Each of the family offenses requires that the petitioner allege and prove intent or recklessness or a repeated course of conduct. A few of the family offenses require a prior such offense conviction.

UNITED WE STAND FOR CHILDREN AND PARENTS

Our mission is to help unite all parents groups into a single voice to change the gender biased, unfair, money driven and corrupt family legal system.

The "Divorce and Domestic Violence INDUSTRY" is out of control and is literally ruining the lives of millions of parents and children daily. Buckle your seat belts because what you are about to learn is a bit unbelievable.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the average custody battle now costs $78,000! This is a $50 billion industry that destroys children for profit because all the research shows that sole custody is harmful to children (see Fatherless Statistics page on left for proof and sources of this research), driving up social problems and pathologies 14,600%. This is the #1 social problem of our time because it is the root cause of at least 20 other social problems including: teen suicide, mass murder, crime, drug usage, parental suicide, teen pregnancy and even over 50% of all mental health problems in the U.S. today. The divorce industry is essentially a criminal racket that is destroying society for its profit motives! Literally!

To eliminate this problem both parents MUST have equal custody rights in EVERY divorce by default, unless there is real proof of harm to a child in front of a jury! The divorce system has become nothing but a cash cow and power machine for lawyer$, judge$ and other government bureaucrats.

This system hurts families and children every day for its own convenience and profit totally ignoring the fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. It is an ILLEGAL kangaroo court. These people have lost touch with "We the people . ."

Family courts today are not a solution for divorcing parents, but a hindrance to the process and very harmful to children and families. Most state family courts operate unconstitutionally, without regard to the highest laws of the land by ignoring supreme court rulings, case law and the many fundamental guarantees of the U.S. and state constitution. Calling them "kangaroo courts" would be too generous as kangaroo courts go through the motions to pretend there is justice and due process - family courts often issue "judgments" without a trial or even an evidentiary hearing, as required by the U.S. Supreme Court to even limit parental rights.

Judges generate "temporary orders" that almost always become permanent to lull you into the belief there will be "real due process" later. There is not any. Most often orders are 100% based on your personal plumbing, not anything that is appropriate given the best interests of children, which we know is almost always near equal time with both parents. Even fathers that are primary caregivers, or spend equal time parenting are generally forced out of their children's lives. In many states, like Massachusetts, there is an order for sole physical custody over 90% of the time! This has been proven by science to be the worst possible scenario for children.

This type of behavior by the courts is by definition tyranny.

Abuse of the people by the court system is why many left England for America. History is repeating itself. The courts are hurting families for the financial gain of states, lawyers, judges and a spiraling government bureaucracy. Basically it is run for the "insiders" not for the benefits of citizens and families.

Today men are treated like criminals in these courts, and not even believed, so that the judge can do whatever they want. You are guilty until proven innocent as a man, and innocent until proven guilty as a woman. This is illegal and in fact an act of treason by judges because they are intentionally ignoring the law.

Remain an Equal Parent to your Child!

Spouses and parent must work around the system and not feed it money. They must use mediators who are not lawyers and divide both children's time and assets fairly. Lawyers will bait you into fights and create an unequal playing field on purpose to generate legal fees. Some lawyers target 40% of your estate before they "let you settle". This is essentially a criminal conspiracy, fraud and anti-trust. It has become so common that they even think it is okay to do, when it is like a doctor injecting you with a disease so they can sell you a cure.

Our Kids Are Everything To Us

Find over 1,200 pages of information helpful to people trapped in the broken, for-profit divorce system.

TAKE ACTION NOW Demand Congressional Oversight Hearings on Family Court's Child Custody Practices

CHILD ABUSE FROM THE BENCH

• By: Geoffrey Cole
• Target: The governor of the State of Florida, Miami, FL

All of us at one time or another find ourselves in front of the family court. THE FAMILY COURT in Dade County is abusing children; either by ignoring their cries, as in this case, or by appointing Guardians that take money , are personal friends of the Judges and who just want a pay day.

WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN? These people believe they are protected by the law, no one can stop them and they are G-d's. Well, we have given them this power...WE VOTED THEM INTO OFFICE. PLEASE HELP STOP CHILDREN ABUSE IN THE DADE COUNTY FAMILY COURT. SIGN OUR PETITION AND ASK THE Govenor office to Investiage Judge Scott Bernstein and Dr. Miguel Firpi.  

Demand Congressional Oversight Hearings on Family Court's Child Custody Practices

• By: Donna Kuge
• Target: President Barack Obama

There is a cover-up occurring in another powerful, venerated, institution, which in many ways mirrors the practices that facilitated the Catholic Church child abuse scandal. For decades, in Family Courts across the nation, women who have tried to protect their children from an abusive father have been attacked and battered by a ruthless system which dismisses or ignores physical abuse, verbal threats, and even documented criminal histories of fathers in a obsessive effort to attain their stated goal - joint custody at all costs. Money too, fuels the atrocities in the courts.

This isn't about good fathers, it’s about the money used to facilitate abusive men. Father's Rights groups (often fronts for male supremacists and abusive men who want to control their families or strike back at the mothers) have fought vehemently to cement shared custody as the default mandate in Family Courts and although their agenda seems reasonable and their image as good, fit fathers benevolent, it belies an ugly essence of hatred, misogyny, and revenge.

These cases are often euphemistically described in the media as "high-conflict," but the reality is that the father is often abusive, controlling, and dangerous, something that Family Court refuses to acknowledge as they push for shared custody.

Endemic legislative policies and procedures in Family Courts endanger and destroy children's lives, and in the worst cases lead to their murders. Family Courts operate with impunity and no oversight, disregarding existing laws designed to protect victims of domestic or child abuse. Institutionalized policies and doctrines countenance and enable the perpetrators while the system covers up illegal rulings and criminal conspiracy by imposing gag orders, fines, threats of loss of custody time, or jail time on women and their children and serve to justify enforced, continued contact with the abuser.

The sensational cases that are covered in the media, where abusive fathers fight for custody and obtain custody then shoot, stab, beat, strangle, drown, throw the children off bridges or high rises, burn them to death, or “merely” rape, sodomize or otherwise physically abuse their children (two out of thousands of examples are, "Killer wins custody of children after 10 years in prison; guardian fights decision," and "Slaying Suspect's Wife Warned of Risk to Children" , are seen as anomalies and unavoidable atrocities, but in reality it is the fundamental flaws in the institution, the systemic practices and policies, and the endemic graft of complicit cottage industries that result in the murders, suicides, and continued abuse of children.

Just as Fathers Shanley, Porter, and Geoghan were seen as aberrations ("bad apples") in the Catholic Church scandal rather than manifestations of a debased system, the media does not link the vast numbers of cases which follow the same identical pattern to the individual cases covered in the stories, thereby unmasking an appalling system that is awarding rapists, registered sex-offenders, domestic violence abusers, drug addicts, and even convicted murderers joint or sole custody of their children. These cases are symptomatic of the underlying dysfunctional and corrupt processes of all Family Courts in every state in this country (and the many other places around the world). 

There are many highly esteemed authorities who have correctly identified the Family Court “epidemic of judicial abuse” and extortion by court assigned experts, all operating without accountability. Congressmen John Conyers, Jim Costa, and Ted Poe have hosted Congressional Briefings on this issue. Former Attorney General Eric Holder stated at the National Summit on the Intersection of Domestic Violence and Child Maltreatment on June 2009, “Why are mothers who are the victims of domestic violence losing custody of their children to the courts…?”

Any parent who is deprived of his or her child, even though temporarily, suffers grievous loss.

Such loss deserves extensive due process protection.

Does a wife who may have driven a husband to suicide with the assistance of our corrupt family court system, then have a legal right to claim copyright — of his suicide note?

According to attorney Rachelle E. Hill, of Bean, Kinney and Korman, and a judge, that is precisely the claim. Their lawyer has written the offices of A Voice for Men to demand that we remove a post from the forums containing the note.

It is not going to happen.

The text of the note was posted to our forums months ago. We considered doing a feature story on it at the time, but opted not to because we had no credible corroboration that the story was factual.

Attorney Hill, her law firm, and the suicide victim’s former wife have now resolved that matter to our satisfaction. The demand letter itself is sufficient for us to believe that the following note is genuine.*

WHY FAMILY LAW NEEDS TO BE REFORMED AND WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURTY WAS NOTIFIED

Nationwide movies of interest pertaining to the pitfalls of Family Law:

www.divorcecorp.com   www.kidsforcasht

WHY FAMILY LAW NEEDS TO BE REFORMED AND WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURTY WAS NOTIFIED

 hemovie.com 

 WHY ALIMONY NEEDS TO BE SHORT, SIMPLE AND TO THE POINT : 2008

Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) Walsh v Walsh DR07-1665 (Alimonypage 2)

Former Husband files a motion for contempt in alimony owed. Lo and behold the Former Wife’s attorney shows up to represent the ex-spouse pro bono. This lawyer filed a notice of appearance on the day of the hearing ( see below ). Why would thislawyer represent the Former Wife for free when this same attorney knowingly hasan active injunction against the Former Husband ?

Former Husband’s alimony contempt hearing transcript that was recorded anddocumented implying that the Former Wife’s attorney is a criminal and the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( F.B.I. ) was notified of this :

Florida General Magistrate Denise Mensh appointed by Judge Alexander finds Former Wife in contempt of alimony owed to Former Husband in Walsh v Walsh DR07-1665. (incidentally, Ms. Mensh was nearly appointed a Judge by formerFlorida Governor Charlie Crist ) :

Florida Judge Alexander pulls a quick one and strikes the recommendations of Magistrate Mensh in walsh v walsh DR07-1665 (alimony) 2012. Keep in mind the Former Husband motioned to recuse Judge Alexander 4 years earlier during his divorce. The Judge refused to step down even though there was an obvious conflict of interest whereas the Judges wife and Former Wife have the same employer.   

Here is a 2014 Florida First District Court of Appeal Case and their interpretation of Alimony in Taylor v Lutz : 

FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT COURT of APPEALS; 

Alimony Decision 2014 in Taylorv Lutz, 1D13-3659 ; 

“A marital settlement agreement is a contract subject to interpretation like any other contract. 

Delissio v. Delissio, 821 So. 2d 350, 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). . . . Where an agreement’s terms are unambiguous, a court must treat the written instrument as evidence of the agreement's meaning and the parties’ intention. Id. A court must not isolate a single term or group of words and read that part in isolation. Id. Rather, the goal is to arrive at a reasonable interpretation of the text of the entire agreement in order to accomplish the agreement's stated meaning and purpose. 

Avellone v. Avellone, 951 So. 2d 80, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Third and finally, as the Florida Supreme Court ruled in Underwood v. Underwood, 64 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1953), “it is not what [the alimony] is called but what it is that fixes its legal status. It is the substance and not the form which is controlling.” Id. at 288. 

Here’s the problem:Judicial discretion has become either a guessing game or a court that is predicated on “judicial misconduct” as in my case. Two Appellate Courts in the same state having similar case substance with two different outcomes; In Walsh v Walsh-DR07-1665, Judge Alexander’s order to strike the recommendation of the General Magistrate contradicts what the Florida First DCA determines as Alimony in the above statement. In his order the Honorable Judge deciphers Florida Statute 61.08 -2, (h) by using the term “TYPICALLY”. 

Does Florida Statute 61.08-2, (h) use “Typically” within this subsection below? Also, in Walsh v Walsh the first Lump Sum payment of $ 5,000.00 was to be paid by Former Wife six (6) weeks after the Final Judgment was signed and ordered by Judge Alexander. This did not happen, and one must ask why? 

Obviously the Former Wife’s attorney Diane Paull had conspired to defraud the Former Husband of receiving any alimony right from the start as agreed to in mediation. It will be shown that the Former Husbands first installment of $5000.00 Lump Sum Alimony payment instead was diverted to the Former Wife’s Attorney, and the Racketeering Enterprise. 

Also, in striking the General Magistrates Recommendation Order, Judge Alexander states the house is to be sold in order for the Former Husband to receive his Alimony. As you read through the MSA (Walsh v Walsh) there is no mention whatsoever of the primary residence being sold. In fact the house wasn’t even listed for sale. Keep in mind the Former Husband was unemployed, a full time college student, and expected the first payment of lump sum alimony (6) weeks after the order was signed to find suitable housing for himself and his dog. Furthermore, why didn’t the Magistrate bring this house for sale scheme into her decision in finding the former wife in contempt ( 3 ) months earlier? Obviously the General Magistrate read the MSA in Walsh v Walsh, and is it possible Judge Alexander had read the wrong MSA? 

Or maybe it’s because the Former Husband filed a complaint to the Florida Bar against the Former Wife’s attorney for misconduct? Unfortunately this investigation was short lived because fellow member of the Florida Bar, Judge Alexander, intervened on behalf of this unscrupulous lawyer and was able to get her off the hook. 

Perhaps the Honorable Judge was just being vindictive towards the Former Husband in his attempt in recusing the Honorable Judge during divorce proceedings? Or just maybe, Judge Alexander is protecting the Former Wife because she happens to work for the same employer as the Judge’s wife? Personally I believe it’s a combination of all. 

This is a major defect within Family Law which allows a Judge the flexibility to make a decision based on ones prejudice, bias, and self serving proceedings. My case demonstrates the abuses of such discretion, and there needs to be specific guidelines for the court to follow in order to prevent any shenanigans from occurring. 

Florida Statute 61.08 – Alimony (2) - In determining whether to award alimony or maintenance, the court shall first make a specific factual determination as to whether either party has an actual need for alimony or maintenance and whether either party has the ability to pay alimony or maintenance. 

If the court finds that a party has a need for alimony or maintenance and that the other party has the ability to pay alimony or maintenance, then in determining the proper type and amount of alimony or maintenance under subsections (5)-(8), the court shall consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to: (h) The tax treatment and consequences to both parties of any alimony award, including the designation of all or a portion of the payment as a nontaxable, nondeductible payment. ( Now read the last 2 sentences of Judge Alexander’s order in striking the Magistrate's Recommendation in ALIMONY OWED in Walsh v Walsh DR07-1665 pertaining to this subsection ). 

Abuse of Judicial Discretion is obvious. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/alexander_and_alimony_final_order_o http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/alimony_owed_in_msa_page_two 

The Former Husband is forced to file an appeal to the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal and submits material evidence of fraud, perjury, and a conspiracy to defraud the court within the Former Husbands (appellant) initial brief. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/fifthe_dca_initial_brief_with_attac The Former Husband files a motion to expedite to the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal pertaining to alimony owed and the possibility of rectifying the Former Husbands traumatic eye injury which is now blind. Also attached to this motion is additional material evidence of fraud involving Former Wife’s lawyer. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/fifth_dca_motion_to_expedite_with_a http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/fifth_dca_motion_to_expedite_is_den 

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal ignores the Former Husbands exhibits showing fraud, perjury, and a conspiracy to defraud the court and affirms 

Judge Alexander’s order that the Former Wife “was not in contempt” of alimony owed without giving an explanation which is “typical” in an appeal. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/fifth_dca_affirmed_alexanders_order 

Former Husband motions The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal For A Written Opinion in reference to Alimony owed in order to expose the Racketeering Enterprise. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/fifth_dca_filed_aand_stamped_motion 

The Former Wife receives the home, keeps her pension, keeps her accumulated vacation time, keeps her salary, keeps her bonuses, and even gets to keep the former husbands best buddy duke his dog. 

In Florida, equal distribution is presumed to be a 50/50 split of assets and debts as the starting point for division, and yet the only thing the Former Husband received from this bogus divorce is : http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/shands_hospital_total_bill http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/magistrate_mensh_mentions_eye_surge 

The Former Husband will show how injunctions are used and abused in making money off of the Federal Government. The Former Husband will also show how intimidating and destructive the legal system can be and how far one must go to expose the Racketeers : 

In January of 2012 the Former Husband is hit with a bogus injunction by Former Wife’s attorney from his political blog. Not only did the Judge call this a domestic violence injunction, the morons sent the Former Husband someone else’s court order. Once again we have more fraud, perjury and a bogus injunction in preventing the Former Husband from receiving his lump sum alimony as agreed to in the Final Judgment of Walsh v Walsh DR07- 1665. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/paull_s_petition_for_injunction http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/judge_cole_and_the_wrong_party http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/judge_cole_calls_it_domestic_violen 

The Former Husband appeals the injunction from his political blog to the Florida First District Court of Appeal and files his initial brief with exhibits of material evidence of fraud, perjury, and why this injunction was orchestrated and issued by the Racketeering Enterprise : http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/florida_first_dca_injunction_initia 

The Former Husband files a motion for a written opinion to the Florida First District Court of Appeal pertaining to a bogus injunction taken from a political blog. 

This is how the racketeers generate revenue for the Racketeering Enterprise: http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/florida_first_dca_appeal_motion_for 

PERMANENT ALIMONY: Even though I am owed alimony, I have been fighting to eliminate Permanent Alimony since 2008 as you can see below. This form of alimony is not only financially and emotionally destructive to those that are paying, but also to those that are receiving. Here’s why; 

First and foremost it keeps both divorced parties entangled within the legal web of conflict and confusion. The cost of going back and forth to court eventually takes its toll on both parties especially if there are children involved. Those that are paying Permanent Alimony are forced to pay in time, energy, and money to someone who is no longer a partner in the family unit. 

Those receiving Permanent Alimony have now become financially conditioned, and a behavior of dependency is created much like those receiving government assistance. Obviously there are those individuals who are in need of government help, and there are those former spouses who may need long term alimony burdened with a disability. Those of us who have been entrapped by the legal system understand the mechanics and main function of why the Family Law Section exists, and that’s to make money. Permanent Alimony is just one of several areas of Family Law that generates revenue for everyone involved except the broken family that ultimately become victims of an abusive Legal System. 
The solution to end this never ending battle of chaos is simple. Five years is plenty of time for someone to receive alimony for the transition of an individual to become self sufficient. 

I was married for 25 years, and I did not ask for nor did I want my marriage to end, and yet I was forced into divorce. I could of requested Permanent Alimony but elected to receive lump sum alimony in order to make the transition with a new life as smooth as possible. Six years later I am still waiting for my lump sum alimony. One must ask, what is the problem? 

The problem is evident that whatever labels of alimony someone is to receive, once you are entrapped by the legal system you will endure years of psychological, emotional, and economic abuse in order to sustain the livelihoods of those who were never part of the family unit in the first place. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/lobbyist_contract 

INJUNCTIONS: This has got to be one of the most abused areas of Family Law. In Walsh v Walsh DR07- 1665, the Former Wife’s attorney realized the Former Husband posted material evidence on his political blog showing that Attorney Diane Paull did indeed violate the law. This lawyer then scurried for support from the other “actors” working within the Racketeering Enterprise by falsifying the an injunction for protection against repeat violence on the Former Husband while at the same time having a Judge order a psychiatric evaluation taken from a political blog. 

Also, why is it ok for the Petitioner of an Injunction to contact the Respondent when the Injunction specifically states such contact is prohibited by law? Unless of course one is privileged (see below). Obviously violence does occur in domestic disputes since the Former Husband had first hand experience with such behavior from his Former Wife (see below). 

In the Former Husband’s case involving Attorney Paull, this was NOT a Domestic Violence Injunction even though the Judge was calling it such. After alerting the Court this was not a Domestic Violence Injunction, but an injunction taken from Former Husbands political blog, the Court continued to reference this as a Domestic Violence Injunction. 

The Former Husband even received someone else’s court order in the mail. The Former Husband not only understood he was dealing with a broken legal system, but a system that has become dangerous to ones livelihood. After several months throughout this ordeal, the Judge realized that I, the Former Husband was a former businessman from the beach, and had several contacts within the local media. 

The Honorable Judge Karen Cole then asked the Former Husband to resend his Appeal, and his upcoming “show of cause hearing” would be canceled. Such an action by the court could make one sense an aroma of bribery was in the air ? 

The Former Husband knew he could not do this in order to show that Family Law needs reforming and the Racketeers working within the Legal System had to be exposed. http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/olgas_arrest_and_state_attorney_and http://issuu.com/walshie50/docs/diane_paull_violates_injunction_fou https://www.facebook.com/NationalDomesticViolenceCorruptionCoalition 

PARENTAL ALIENATION AND THE COURT SYSTEM

Research shows that most children long for a good relationship with both parents and want to be raised by both. Obviously the worst part of divorce is that children do not get to spend enough time with their parents. The parent they spend the most time with during the week usually has less time for the children after the divorce because of the responsibilities of earning a living and running a household without the other parent’s assistance. Evidence also shows that children are unsatisfied with the type of relationship they can have with a parent seen mainly on weekends. There is enough evidence that proves children are more aware of their collective co-existence in society by keeping the original family unit in tact. 

Unfortunately this is not the case. Once the legal system intervenes and takes control of the now fractured Family Unit the situation for the child for the most part worsens. This can be contributed to the ideology that Family Law utilizes an adversarial approach that initiates unnecessary conflict. 

This strategic manipulation is exploited by many people associated with the legal system in order to make money. After all it's always about the money. As for the children of divorced parents they are cast into an environment of emotional turmoil exasperated by strangers who for the most part lack the knowledge and compassion in understanding the traditions that have been firmly established within that particular Family Unit. One must ask why so much confusion ? Parental Alienation is an indirect, and at times a direct cause from those outside forces whose influence may damage the relationship between children and parents. 

Much like Permanent Alimony, Falsified Injunctions, and any other aspect of Family Law these outside influences tend to capitalize on ones vulnerability. In realty Family Law has become a “business” which is structured around those outsiders who have been conditioned into believing that they know what's best for the child. 

When one really understands the true meaning of “NO FAULT DIVORCE” you begin to realize that it isonly a belief system that contradicts the very existence of why it was created in the firstplace.Great read and written by good friend Nick Tufaro :  

Behind the numbers : www.leonkozioljd.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/state-incentive-to-collect-childsupport-bigger-piece-of-federal-funds-pie 

Children are being used as pawns : www.answerisland.com/child-support-kickbacks.html 

Statistics of interest : www.scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1709&context=law_faculty_scholarship 

HOW CAN SOMEONE GO FROM THIS……….. TO THIS ! UNLESS OF COURSE THERE IS ….......... THIS ! 

The 1st Solution; Notify the Feds !2nd Solution; The media !3rd Solution; The way of our Ancestors ! 

www.issuu.com/walshie50/docs/paulls_lawsuit_and_dhs_filed__1_/3? e=12884962/8737598 www.issuu.com/walshie50/docs/culture_of_corruption_and_joe_biden 

Within 2 Months Of Notifying The Feds Another Racketeering Enterprise Is Exposed Involving Attorney Kelly Mathis A Former Jacksonville Bar President : www.news4jax.com/news/Allied-Veterans-executives-top-officers-at-FOP-facejudges/19294694 
www.jacksonville.com/news/crime/2014-02-12/story/jacksonville-lawyer-kelly-mathissentenced-6-years-mastermind-allied 

My Alimony Interview On Dan Rather World News Tonight : www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QZ8xXUzXoM&feature=channel www.youtube.com/watch?v=n25PH0fNpqE&feature=channel 

My 2008 Candidacy For Florida State Representative Blog : www.walshie4staterep.blogspot.com www.slamdunk4walshie.blogspot.com 

My Involvment In Reforming Family Law : www.facebook.com/walshie4staterep?ref=tn_tnmn 

People Of Action Helping The Cause Florida Attorney Mark Adams: http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2009/10/strange-disbarment-of-mark-adams.html https://www.google.com/#q=florida+attorney+mark+adams Marsha Maines to VA State Reps : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYe_b4uzjII https://www.google.com/#q=marsha+maines Pennsylvania Attorney Andy Ostrowski : https://www.google.com/#q=andy+ostrowski http://pennsylvaniacivilrightslawnetwork.com/author/andy-ostrowski/ https://www.facebook.com/ostrowskiforcongress Diane Gochin: https://www.facebook.com/Diane1120?fref=ts Andy and Diane speaking at Judicial Reform rally in Lackawanna County, PA (Kids For Cash and Cash For Kids) https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=5ecKHGIO43I&feature=player_embedded Teri C. Stoddard : https://www.facebook.com/teriincali?fref=ts https://www.facebook.com/pages/National-Alimony-and-Family-CourtReform/562306470499710 Michelle Christensen : https://www.facebook.com/michelle.christensen.9421? fref=ts Terance Healy : https://www.facebook.com/pterance?fref=ts Debbie Leff : https://www.facebook.com/debbie.leff?fref=ts Nick Tufaro : https://www.facebook.com/nick.tufaro?fref=ts Lazaro Ecenarro : https://www.facebook.com/jlecenarro?fref=ts Bruce levine : https://www.facebook.com/bruce.levine.5?fref=ts Sandy Fonzo : https://www.facebook.com/sandy.fonzo?fref=ts Independent Gazette : http://wilkesbarrescrantonig.com/ Integrity Florida : http://www.integrityflorida.org/ Frank Denton (Editor) : The Florida Times Union Newspaper : http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story/news/2014/03/18/florida-times-union-editor-firstamendment-award-tu/6568039/ Concerned Taxpayers of Duval County, Florida (CTDC) : http://www.jaxtaxpayers.org/category/featured-story/ Curtis Lee (A passion for Justice, and a real Patriot; a retired N.Y. Attorney takes on the Police Pension Fund in Jacksonville, Florida) : http://members.jacksonville.com/news/crime/2014-03-31/story/legislation-couldbroaden-public-records-law

Related articles

• Family Lawyers Listen Up!!!! the Supreme Court Requires You to Cooperate
• Florida Bar Accused of Misconduct
• ... is it about the Dads? Or is it about Imminent Embezzlement Scams" - Florida Supreme Court
• Should judges be held to the same standards as the rest of us when they commit misconduct?
• Criminalize Parental Alienation ~ 3 STRIKES FELONY
• Rewrite of the Florida Family Law Rules almost complete.
• Courts seek 24 new judges, most in South Florida
• Mystery fireball seen falling from sky in Brevard County, Florida
• Miami Attorney to Become Florida Bar President in 2017
• Regulate Florida Ends Campaign to Legalize Marijuana in 2016