A self-censored chronicle of family court dramas, lived by parents who lost all or some visitation with or custody of a child or children based on perjury and/or other false courtroom evidence
"Certain rights provided by the US constitution do not apply in Family court.....Although it is not written anywhere in our Federal or State Constitutions, Family Courts have given themselves a pass on Juries...." SHATTERING THE LIFE OF A 3YR OLD
The Judge Daniel D’Alessandro Case FM-09-1928-14A
Divorce Corp 2014 - USA movie
A back-stiffening documentary that makes a persuasive case for the reform of family law court
More money flows through the family courts, and into the hands of courthouse insiders, than in all other court systems in America combined - over $50 billion a year and growing. Through extensive research and interviews with the nation's top divorce lawyers, mediators, judges, politicians, litigants and journalists, this documentary uncovers how children are torn from their homes, unlicensed custody evaluators extort money, and abusive judges play god with people's lives while enriching their friends. This explosive documentary reveals the family courts as unregulated, extra-constitutional fiefdoms.
"The lawyers have been granted complete immunity in Family court, a lawyer can say or do anything no matter how false or cruel and waste tens of thousands of dollars intentionally and maliciously and they cannot be sued for malicious prosecution or excessive litigation."
"50% of US marriages end in divorce.Divorce is more than a 50 billion dollar a year industry."
"There is an expression, that people can get as much justice as they can afford...and most people can't get any justice at all."
"Basically what the Court does is it creates a battleground in which each side hurls the harshest accusations they can come up with because they are desperate to win." ~Lecturer Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA
"You essentially paper the other side….until they can’t take it anymore." ~Attorney, Beverly Hills, CA
Thousands of parents across the state will only voting for candidates who are willing to address the operational dysfunction and inherent corruption in our state's "family courts" - some of the worst in the nation where well connected attorneys, Guardi...See More
We agree to meet with me tomorrow in Tampa. I will advocate for the creation of a subcommittee composed of low to middle income litigants that desire to participate in the process to fix problems that directly affect them and incorporating real world experience that no member of the Commission has directly.I am hoping that he agrees or presents my request to other Commission members and they agree to my request. Closed my don't get feed. Commissions in other states may have 3 members or more so to my knowledge there is no set rule that the Commission cannot add members. What harm could it do? California has a Commission and has HUGE civil court problems and other states. I think adding non attorneys/judges members reflective of the people the Commission was created to help will actually bring a very important missing component. I will let you know how everything turns out tomorrow or Saturday depending on what time I return. It is a 3-3.5 hour drive.
The Florida Legislature passed the Parental Rights Memorial, thus making Florida the fifth State in the Union to call on Congress to pass the Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution! Mission accomplished!
Florida Parental Rights Memorial ~ In the 2011 legislative session, the Parental Rights Memorial (HM 557 and SM 954) passed overwhelmingly in the Florida House with a voice vote, and unanimously in the Florida Senate. Both chambers gave the Parental Rights Memorial bipartisan support. HM 557, sponsored by Representative Marti Coley was also cosponsored by the following members of the Florida House: Representatives Adkins, Baxley, Boyd, Brandes, Burgin, Caldwell, Campbell, Corcoran, Costello, Ford, Fresen, Gaetz, Gonzalez, Harrell, Hooper, Julien, Kreegel, Logan, Mayfield, McBurney, Metz, Moraitis, Perry, Pilon, Plakon, Porter, Precourt, Smith, Snyder, Stargel, Steube, and Wood.
The United States Constitution is the wellspring of civil
rights for American citizens. The Constitution, along with the Bill of Rights,
subsequent Amendments, and Supreme Court rulings, define our fundamental
freedoms and outline our unique system of law which, in the words of Founding
Father John Adams, assures that American democracy remains a “government of
laws and not of men.”
The term “civil rights” refers to the fundamental freedoms
of the individual. These rights are rooted in the 14th Amendment to the
Constitution, ratified in 1868:
No State shall make or enforce any
law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,
nor shall any State deprive any persons of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
The original purpose behind the 14th Amendment was to
protect the rights of Blacks newly freed from slavery by President Lincoln’s
Emancipation Proclamation. Lamentably, southern states passed a series of
so-called Jim Crow laws during the following decades that promoted racial
segregation and discrimination, all under the guise of “separate but equal.”
Beginning in 1917, the U.S. Supreme Court began to strike down these laws.
Once again, Americans’ fundamental liberties are being
challenged. This time, the justification emanates from a social mandate to curb
intimate partner aggression, commonly referred to as “domestic violence.” This
Special Report enumerates and analyzes the far-reaching impacts of domestic
violence laws on Americans’ civil rights.
“We must scrupulously guard the
civil rights and civil liberties of all citizens, whatever their background. We
must remember that any oppression, any injustice, any hatred, is a wedge
designed to attack our civilization.” —Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Following are the 12 civil rights that have
been undermined by Family and Domestic Violence laws.
Lunes, 13 de Enero, 2014 *MÉXICO* Enlaces: *- Visita de la Asociación Mexicana de Padres de Familia Separados al PAN-DF.*- * Asociación Mexicana de Padres Familia Separados* - COMUNICADO: Alineación paternal tras el divorcio - Congreso del estado aprueba la "Alienación Parental"*-* Iniciativa que reforma el Código Civil Federal para erradicar la conducta de alienación parental. más enlaces al final de la entrada *Publicado por Carlos Meza Viveros* Carlos Meza Viveros De manera inexacta, algunos códigos sustantivos en el país consideran de manera taxativa que, cuando se dis...more »
Constitutional Fundamental Right to Parent in the U.S.A.
Miércoles, 11 de Septiembre, 2013 Publicado en FACEBOOK, por Carlos Gargon Dedicado al Juez de Familia de León Por favor, Leerlo y difundirlo. Dentro de unos días os contaré toda la historia. PARRAFOS DE UNA CARTA ABIERTA DE UN PADRE A UN JUEZ DE FAMILIA (VALE CUALQUIER JUEZ…) ….. Cuando un juez dicta una sentencia de divorcio sin entrar en las condiciones de vida en la que van a quedar los padres y lo justifica diciendo que lo único que atiende es el bienestar de los niños, está usando una falacia y al mismo tiempo es un canallada “legal”. Se por todo lo que he visto en el último ...more »
Father involvement is critical for your organization. Father Friendly Check-Up™ is a Low Intensity tool to help you successfully engage dads and strengthen the families in your community. This assessment allows you to analyze your physical environment, location, organizational philosophies, staff attitudes, and more.
FEDS ABANDON 'EQUAL RIGHTS' CLAIM TO RAISE YOUR KIDS
'Much work to be done before decades of federal overreach is reversed'
Federal officials have reversed their claim that they have “equal rights” to children to raise them, a claim that stirred outrage in many quarters of America when it was first made a few months back.
The claim originally was included in a draft policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education and generously allowed that parents, too, should be allowed to help raise their own children along with the government, through various programs.
The document, the “Draft Policy Statement on Family Engagement From the Early Years to the Early Grades,” stated at the time: “It is the position of the departments that all early childhood programs and schools recognize families as equal partners in improving children’s development, learning and wellness across all settings, and over the course of their children’s developmental and educational experiences.”
The newest release of the statement, however, now provides that, “Families are children’s first and most important teachers, advocates, and nurturers. Strong family engagement in early childhood systems and programs is central – not supplemental – to promoting children’s healthy intellectual, physical, and social-emotional development; preparing children for school; and supporting academic achievement in elementary school and beyond. Research indicates that families’ involvement in children’s learning and development impacts lifelong health, developmental, and academic outcomes.”
The HSLDA had blasted the earlier statement, in fact, dispatching Estrada to meet with senior officials from the U.S. Department of Education and “personally” explaining the significant issues with the draft statement, including opposition from parents to the “bureaucratic arrogance.”
The change is a very mich improved version, the HSLDA pointed out, making clear that “families have strong and sustained effects on children’s learning, development, and wellness.”
“Despite this victory,” the group explained. “there are other problems with the document that remain. The document’s working definition of ‘family’ still includes not only a child’s parents or legal guardians, but ‘all adults who interact with early childhood systems in support of their child, to include biological, adoptive, and foster parents; grandparents; legal and infromal guardians; and adult siblings.’”
HSLDA exlained, “In situations where conflict may exist between a child’s parents and other family members regarding educational choices, this still quite broad definition of family is not hepful for clarity regarding parental rights in education.”
The organization explained, “There is much work to be done before decades of federal overreach in K-12 education is reversed.”
The document does still include a suggestion that families and institutions “partner” to give children better results in school.
WND reported the original plan by the government was to “systematically” engage families about their own children.
“At HSLDA, we believe that these statements reveal these agencies’ true beliefs: that a child’s God-given family does not matter. Family is whomever or whatever the government says it is,” Estrada wrote at the time.
He cited other government agendas, such as pushing the political correctness in Common Core, “dangerous U.N. treaties,” as well as suggestions for universal preschool.
Federal officials have reversed their claim that they have “equal rights” to children to raise them, a claim that stirred outrage in many quarters of America when it was first made a few months back. The claim originally was included in a draft policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the […]
