A self-censored chronicle of family court dramas, lived by parents who lost all or some visitation with or custody of a child or children based on perjury and/or other false courtroom evidence
The Co-principal Investigators of The Study are Robert F. Anda, MD, MS, with the CDC; and Vincent J. Felitti, MD, with Kaiser Permanente.
Over 17,000 Kaiser patients participating in routine health screening volunteered to participate in The Study. Data resulting from their participation continues to be analyzed; it reveals staggering proof of the health, social, and economic risks that result from childhood trauma.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that allpleadings
shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal
rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep
by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the
purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The
court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be
construed to do substantial justice.
Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S.
22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama,
375 U.S.
449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and
reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the
most important rights under the constitution and laws."
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA
"Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is
unable to tend to his or her own interest.
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner,
however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v.
Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to
technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high
standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938)
~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving
at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should
not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading
is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to
accomplish the end of a just judgment."
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S.
415); United Mineworkers of America
v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and
Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist
other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without
being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."
Picking v. Pennsylvania
Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and
described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held
"Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights,
the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to
technicalities."
Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less
stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v.
Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).
Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical
advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace
of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately,
disrespect for the law."
Sherar v. Cullen,
481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one
because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S.
pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any
state/State."
Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common
right."
Nothing in this message or the group's archives should be considered legal advise. Please consult an attorney for that stuff because they claim to know these things and will happily charge you a lot of money for sharing their knowledge and experience.
The 14%er is a newsletter for noncustodial parents. The August issue includes news about an App for Divorce, a poem by Edmond Dantes, and resources to strengthen the parent-child bond. Read it at
Posted by Don Mathis on Sunday, August 2, 2015
Poetry (Footsteps, by Jennifer Lefkowski), Links to Father's Day Articles, Parents Forced to pay Kids' College Costs,...
Posted by Don Mathis on Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Grassroots advocates, public interest attorneys, and legal scholars gathered in October 2011 at the University of Baltimore for the debut symposium of "The Matthew Fogg Symposia On The Vitality of Stare Decisis In America." Convening such a broad and in many ways diverse audience, requires the program series to be worthwhile academically, yet have populist appeal. Towards that end, the event website explains: "It is both scholarly and practical to examine the current vitality of stare decisis as a legal doctrine in America."
Disminuye la tristeza y la ansiedad por la pérdida que sufren los niños cuando sus padres se separan; el padre en la custodia compartida no pasa a ser un simple visitador. Mantiene un contacto estable con toda su red familiar, materna y paterna, importante pilar de apoyo y cariño para el niño. Desaparecen los conflictos entre adultos por la IGUALDAD que les permite, en el día a día, ejercer su deber como padre/madre, participando en todo lo que tiene que ver con el hijo/a: médico, colegio, actividades, problemas cotidianos, etc. Desaparecen las maletas, pues hay casos en los que los adultos son los que se mueven al domicilio del niño, aunque la mayoría de las familias necesita dos viviendas en las cuales el niño dispone de todo lo necesario, de forma que no necesite llevar más que libros o similares de forma puntual. Hoy en día, con los regímenes de visitas quincenales + vacaciones de verano + Navidad + semana santa + carnavales, el niño hace constantes cambios con su maleta, pero esto desaparece en el CC porque los dos progenitores tienen el deber de hacer que el niño disponga de todo lo necesario y tenga un espacio propio en casa de mamá y papá. Beneficia a la famila materna y paterna por extensión, que no tiene que romper los vínculos con los menores, hecho que ocurre hoy en día por el escaso tiempo de visita que tiene el no custodio. Esto mejora los niveles de felicidad y la participación de toda la red familiar del niño. Reparte y así disminuye la carga de responsabilidad del adulto tradicionalmente custodio, que puede rehacer su vida y continuar con su carrera profesional si lo desea. Esto también aumenta los índices de bienestar familiar y reduce el conflicto. Reduce la sensación de pérdida del no custodio, en lo referente sobre todo a los hijos (educación, ocio , salud, etc.) y se reduce el sufrimiento emocional. Reduce el conflicto relativo al reparto de las responsabilidades y respecto a los derechos de las partes, con un diálogo de igual a igual, donde es más sencillo aparcar cuestiones personales y centrarse en el bienestar de los niños. Ambos ejercen la patria potestad, ya que disponen de los medios necesarios (espacio y tiempo). La corresponsabilidad parental se normaliza.
¿Por qué decir NO a que abogados sean elegidos en la Legislatura?Mire explicacion.
