Tuesday

Mom says to Family Court Judge Manno-Schurr "It's Too Inconvenient" and Judge Agrees?!?

"Too Inconvenient" - Florida Family Court Abuse Against "FIT" Father

Dearest Daughter,

I love you so much. 

Yesterday I gazed out the window watching fireworks and was really missing my angel but I cannot call her because I am scared of her mom’s false allegations and lies, she doesn't call me and knowing she is only a couple of mile away hurts like hell.

Please know that daddy, your brother, your grandparents, your cousins, aunts and uncles; your whole family loves you and misses you very much.

I tried to get to see you but your mom told the Judge, in family court on April 24th, 2013, that "it's too inconvenient for her to take you to visit with me".

What can be worse than that?
Judge Manno-Schurr agreed with mom. In my opinion this is Parental Alienation by Mom facilitated by the Family Court.

Judge granted Mom's Motion to Strike the Amicus Brief filed by Dad that explains to the Family Court that "Parental Alienation is Emotional Child Abuse" written by Linda Kase Gottlieb's L.C.S.W., L.M.F.T.

A Family Court Services Report regarding the 12 supervised visits dated January 29th, 2013 states: "After greeting, Mr. Inguanzo immediately engaged Daughter in conversation and play. Father and daughter discussed different topics such as school, science, books, a trip to France, physical education, Zoraya's older brother and other relatives, holidays, etc. Mr.Iinguanzo also practiced speaking Spanish with Daughter.

Mr. Inguanzo frequently demonstrated physical affection, to which Daughter allowed and reciprocated. Mr. Inguanzo displayed behaviors indicative of being nurturing patient, and attentive to Daughter's needs. Daughter appeared to enjoy her father's company. Daughter and her father displayed a very good level of interaction."

I have not seen and or spoken with Daughter since January 5th, 2013.
I promise I will keep trying Zoraya and I will never, never, never, never give in.

I love you,




Children's Rights Bad Judges and Lawyers Reporting page Take Bad Judges Off Bench Do not re-elect bad Family Court...
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
WLYB......I have tried to educate this board of 4 Florida Judges (Chief Judge Bertila Soto-11th Jud. Cir. FL, Judge...
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Judge Manno-Schurr It is in the child's best interests that contact and visits be restored SWIFTLY and FULLY11th...
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Do not re-elect bad Family Court Judges Bad Judges and Lawyers Reporting page
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Do not re-elect bad Family Court Judges Bad Judges and Lawyers Reporting page
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
https://www.causes.com/posts/968217
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Wednesday, December 16, 2015
How much more can children be expected to take? http://bit.ly/1SYfcaG
Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army on Monday, December 14, 2015


Daddy


Family Law Reform Demonstration at Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Miami Florida 1
Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center
175 N.W. 1st Avenue
Miami, Florida 33128
Dear Honorable Judges:
The purpose of this letter is to and for verifying that I am the Natural Mother and that David M. Inguanzo is the Natural Father of David K. Inguanzo born on the 20th of September 1999. I have known David M. Inguanzo since 1992 when we met at St. Thomas University. In 1995 we began living together which led to our marriage and the birth of our son. Our marriage ended on June 4th, 2004. I remarried in 2007 and have 2 more children named Noah and Faith.
Since we met, during our relationship, and up to the present David and I have had our share of differences which I think is normal in human nature as not everyone can agree on everything and most times we just have to agree to disagree. However any and all of the differences that David and I have experienced have always been overcome and in the end we have always, and I am sure that we will always continue, acting in the best interest of our son.
Moreover, David is a devote and loving Father and has enjoyed liberal timesharing with our son since our divorce. He takes excellent care of our son and I encourage that they spend as much time together as possible. During the school year our son resides with me and during the summer school break our son resides with his Father. Our son has traveled extensively with his Father on cruises, road trips and annual skiing trips to Utah. David (the Father) is very sports oriented and our son has taken after his Father and loves to play baseball, racquetball and swimming just to name a few.
David is worldly wise and highly intelligent and has taught and continues to teach our son the most important life lessons and virtues such as responsibility, honesty, and most importantly honor. He teaches him about good morals and ethics, patience, determination and resilience, and religion and spirituality. In addition to my Father and my husband, David is one of the best dads on this planet! My other two children love him and I completely trust him with our son and them.
Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for others?'






Life’s most persistent and urgent question is, ‘What are you doing for others?’

David has demonstrated time and time again that there is not a moment that he would hesitate to take our son to the doctor, to school, to church, to play sports, to roller-skate, to buy him clothes and food wherever he may be with our son and regardless of his own personal interest. David’s has demonstrated to me that his life revolves around his children; David and Zoraya.
He has made sacrifices in his life to ensure that David and Zoraya always have what they need and they will always be together as a family. Zoraya has been raised together with our son David and is always thinking about her. David (the Father) has taught our son the importance of “Family.”
facebook.com/ParentalAlienationMiamiFlorida
Co-Parenting our son with David has been very enlightening to me. We treat each other with respect and understanding, helping each other to promote and provide a safe, loving and nurturing environment. At times David can be very vocal in his ideas, beliefs and thoughts on how to best raise our son, we have always put our best points forward and from this we have learned together thus making us better Parents. In our relationship as parents we do not argue…we mediate as adults and together decide what is best.
Please know that I have never seen David act out of control, in anger and or in hatred towards me and or to another person. I am absolutely certain that he would never harm anyone and am sure that anyone who really knows David believes this including Zoraya’s Mother, Ms. Nixa Rose.
I can honestly and reverently declare that having David as my son’s Father has been a blessing.
Please feel free to contact me should the need arise.
Respectfully submitted,
Danniza Liendo
Copy furnished to: Mr. Joel E. Greenberg, Esq.

Stand up for Zoraya – GoFundMe




"Oh Christmas lights, keep shining on" ~ Coldplay »
Children with involved, loving fathers are significantly more likely to do well in school, have healthy self-esteem, exhibit empathy and pro-social behavior, and avoid high-risk behaviors such as drug use, truancy, and criminal activity compared to children who have uninvolved fathers.

• Studies on parent-child relationships and child well-being show that father love is an important factor in predicting the social, emotional, and cognitive development and functioning of children and young adults.
• 24 million children (34 percent) live absent their biological father.


  

As advised by lawyers, separating and/or divorcing parents often make false allegations of domestic violence (DV) in the form of a restraining order to evict an innocent parent from the home, interfere with contact with child/ren, and then file for temporary custody (virtually never temporary). False police reports are often obtained and used in DV Court...called "information only reports", but contain a fabricated incident of DV and thus a serious crime if and when exposed.

We only support organizations who show an understanding that children need both parents, and that either parent is equally capable of the choice to perpetrate hate or declare peace.





STOP THE HEARTBREAK JUDGE MANNO-SCHURR ~~ 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court... http://bit.ly/1VBlVaG
Posted by David Inguanzo on Monday, October 5, 2015
Happy Birthday Zoraya!Stand Up For Zoraya
Posted by David Inguanzo on Sunday, August 2, 2015








Yesterday I gazed out the window watching fireworks and was really missing my angel but I cannot call her because I am...
Posted by The Fathers' Rights Movement on Wednesday, June 19, 2013
"Without a father in her life, she would be bereft of so much love. What child, whatever the situation, deserves to be deprived of that?"



Stand Up For Zoraya originally shared:
Families are being abused by Family Courts throughout the United States. A major issue that needs to be addressed! 
I cut my ex out of our daughter's life: Now I'm glad he fought tooth and nail to see her
Thanks for following, contributing, and supporting Stand Up For Zoraya's Facebook Page at the URL you're on now:...
Posted by Children's Rights on Friday, June 12, 2015
STOP THE HEARTBREAK JUDGE MANNO-SCHURR ~~ 11th Judicial Circuit Family Court... http://bit.ly/1VBlVaG
Posted by David Inguanzo on Monday, October 5, 2015
Happy Birthday Zoraya!Stand Up For Zoraya
Posted by David Inguanzo on Sunday, August 2, 2015
No you can't see your daughter - 2016

Monitor Wanted for Supervised Visitation in Miami-Dade County, FL - Case No. 2008-29595 Family Court -...
Posted by Omar Inguanzo on Tuesday, March 31, 2015

What happens in Florida when visitation rights are frustrated?

NOTHING!!!!

Miami-Dade Police Department - Florida
Miami, FL – MIAMI-DADE POLICE (MDPD) Department’s  Professional Compliance Bureau (PCB) Major Shimminger conducted a PCB investigation on the reporting officer but failed to properly investigate false police report report by Mother who fabricated an incident on 12/18/08 of domestic violence alleging the Father tried to run Mother off the road.
Judge Victoria R. BrennanThe MDPD never contacted the Father about the alleged incident that allegedly occurred on 12/17/08 at about 5 p.m. which the Mother reported on 12/18/08 at about 7 p.m.; 26 hours after the alleged incident. The Mother obtained an “information only” police report from MDPD Officers that Mother and her attorney used later in a biased (man-hater) judge’s DV courtroom of Honorable Victoria Brennen. Mother violated Florida Statutes 741 and 837 and the MDPD did nothing!
On 12/24/08 the Father received a letter in the mail from Colleen Huott/Joel Greenberg, the Mother's lawyers, that stated the aforesaid incident had occurred. They also asked me to give up all my parental rights and responsibilities, allow her last name to be changed, pay no child support, and never see her again. On or about 12/26/08, the Father found a police report existed after contacting the MDPD. The Father reported to the police that he was at work during the alleged time/date of incident and  that the police report was false. And after being advised by a lawyer the Father filed a police report against the Mother for making a false police report. The father spoke to Captain Bollinger-Heller (Domestic Crimes Bureau) about it. SHE suggested he should just “let this go”. She also referred him to an MDPD Victim’s Advocate. The Father replied by sending a complete, clear, and concise report back to the MDPD’s Major Herrera of the Domestic Crimes Bureau requesting further investigation. A copy was sent to State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundel, Honorable Judge Maria Espinosa Dennis, and Honorable Judge Sandy Karlin (Administrative Judge of the 11th Judicial Circuit’s Family Division).
Stop False Allegations
This matter is well documented and fills half of a banker’s box. There is evidence to prove police misconduct. The Father eventually became disabled because of the trauma he suffered and continues to suffer.
The Father has known the Mother since 1990 when they started dating and there has NEVER been any incident of domestic violence. The Father filed a paternity suit for his Father’s rights to his daughter and the Mother was advised by her attorney to make the false allegations to the police to gain an upper hand in the family court case.
False Accusers
We can provide all the documents, police reports, and case numbers if your interested in pursuing this case. The Father also contacted State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundel on 3 occasions only to be referred back to the MDPD. The Father corresponded directly with the now retired Director of the MDPD Mr. Loftus who referred him to his subordinates, Major Shimminger and Major Herrera. The Father still battles these false allegations until today.

You might have noticed that the theme of our most recent publicity messages center around “sharing the truth”.

And there’s a reason for this: we’ve been seeing a rather robust effort on the part of our opposition to blatantly lie to the Public in an attempt to thwart Family Law reform.

In reality, this is not new.  Because they’ve been doing this for the last forty years or so.

Never the less, you’re probably seeing a ridiculous talking point come up a lot lately.  I’ve seen it all over, and it’s probably best described by a Facebook post I saw in the Love and Iron newsfeed from NC Fathers.  Here is the opening post:



Celebrates the love fathers have for their daughters, inspiring them to embrace the important role they hold in their daughters' lives and to provide the love, nurture, and emotional support that only they can give.

The Cause "Stand Up For Zoraya" celebrates the love fathers have for their daughters, inspiring them to embrace the important role they hold in their daughters' lives and to provide the love, nurture, and emotional support that only they can give.
Pledged to bring awareness, celebrate, and support Father-Daughter Relationship Education






Do not define me by my gender or race or popular opinion, but by my basic human rights as a parent

Fighting the disease, not treating the symptoms... The overall picture is human rights, parental rights. When you go into court, try making a point to keep yourself from defining yourself on the team that is not popular or favored in society. Proudly
"Father - Pastor, Provider and Protector." ~ Fathers in the Field Stand Up For Zoraya
Posted by David Inguanzo on Saturday, March 14, 2015




Scott Adams
Dads Must Create The Safe Space Daughters Need - Or She Will Find It Somewhere Else As long as there is breath, there is still hope and…Read More






I'm NOT going to give up. ~~~~~
Denial of reasonable access to your own kids is child abuse
  • Reynaldi Meurs wrote on his Timeline. -- Felicitaciones.. Hopi Pabien Amigo desde Aruba -- Orlando J. Garcia wrote on his Timeline. -- A belated Happy Birthday to you man! -Homer Inguanzo wrote on his Timeline. -- Felicidades !! Bethy Hernandez Escobedo wrote on his Timeline. -- Feliz cumpleaños,un abrazo con cariño Jose Lino Bran wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday. Make it a good one Eric Kittendorff wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy happy birthday! Elisa Breitenbach wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David!!! Don Presar wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday, David! Erik Ekberg wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David! Patti Paavala wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Happy Birthday David! Hope your day is special! 󾔑󾔑󾔑 rez Escoto Uriel wrote on his Timeline. -- Felicidades mi amigo, le pido a Dios te bendiga grandemente, un abrazo. uardo Inguanzo rote on his Timeline. -- Felicidades. Que lo disfrutes con tu familia, un abrazo Heidi Kirschbaum Romero wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday. You are my best friend forever. Hope you have a happy day. Thinking about you. Best wishes. Kisses Stu Bobcat wrote on his Timeline. -- happy birthday David from the Bobcats Yanela De Dip wrote on his Timeline. -- HBD David :)  Saludos Tony Robinson wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David may you have many more General Parker wrote on his Timeline. -  Happy B-Day David Andre Maurice wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Earthday!! Evan Inlaw wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday! 󾔐󾔗󾔖󾰀󾮗 Cee C Alonso wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday David Jerry Michaud wrote on his Timeline. -- Have a great b day David Barbara Salinas wrote on his Timeline. -- HAppy Birthday! Corey Poitier wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday David  wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday Amanda Carol Stedman wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday! Marcela Inguanzo Reza wrote on his Timeline. -- Feliz cumpleaños un abrazo . Judi Brideau wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday  Amparo Santos Santos wrote on his Timeline. -- Felicidades David , bendiciones Jose Manuel Inguanzo wrote on his Timeline. -- Muchas felicidades Alicia Jenkins wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David Lili Inguanzo wrote on his Timeline. -- Feliz cumpleaños primo Midge Simms Heathcock wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday, David. Hope you have a great day! Joe Lewis wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday Dave!!! Frank Spagnola wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday Yamile Garcia-Cerra wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David! :-) Fabio Castillo Rodriguez wrote on his Timeline. -- Felicidades, que el Se;or le ayude a estar con su prole. Chris Di Maggio wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday! Debbie Peters wrote on his Timeline. -- HAPPY BIRTHDAY David Manny J. Delgado wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David! Alex Perez wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday David have a great day and a fun night  Silvia Gonzalez wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday wishing you lots of health n many blessings, may all your dreams n hopes come true. Enjoy Hal Tannenbaum wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David Graham wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David!! Hope you have a good one!! Lisa Kirkby wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday!!! Luis Alberto Fundora wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday Eduardo De Prado wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday David enjoy your day. Edwin O'Dell wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday!! Max Ford wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday!!! David Inguanzo Ashley Farr Regan wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday! Tomas N. Regalado wrote on his Timeline. -- happy bday David. have a great day DT Linda Gross wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday. Enjoy! Jeff Kottkamp wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday! Peter Lomtevas wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday! Kathryn Casey wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday! Terry Armstrong wrote on his Timeline. -- Many Happy Returns David Rick Lelchuk wrote on his Timeline. -- Here's a birthday video Kool and the Gang and I made for your Birthday. Enjoy your birthday and many more! RICK  http://youtu.be/10-fiUWviO4 Rosaura Torres Author wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday my friend, I pray you have a bless and wonderful day. :) Marlena K. Pakula wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday David !!! Have a lovely day :) Robert Young wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday! Alberto Sanchez wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday Susanne Lindgren Pedersen wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthsday. Have a nice day. :) Elizabeth Walker Docherty wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday, David, x  Sean Nevola wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday! Malik Basurto wrote on his Timeline. -- Have a great birthday tomorrow from California or today in Florida.  Pamela Richardson Kelner wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy birthday, David!  Bern Saab wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday and all the best David Inguanzo! xx  Jim Bailey wrote on his Timeline. -- Happy Birthday from Beach Haven, Auckland, New Zealand - BEST be Onward together with Elohim and His WHOLE Restored Hebrew Scriptures - Those Restored Scriptures O/T and N/T are NOW available translated direct to contemporary language - Thus avoiding the many PAGAN Names, words, understandings that have been brought to us thru the Greek, Latin and yes ancient English PAGAN language so called translations which have become ** BIBLiolatry ** - 2 of the direct to contemporary translations that I am currently Prayerfully Reading are ISR98, found at FB page ** The Scriptures** and found FREE to those who cant afford, funded by those who can atwww.halleluyahscriptures.com -OR- When in my neck of the woods. the same applies at Mens-Table also on FB - PLEASE NOTE - I am also seeking copies ofwww.coyhwh.com when my Tithe allows or donations speed funding - Jim - P/S Join our FB Study Group ** Our Creators Downloads **
  • Bob Saunders wrote on his Timeline.
    Wishing you a Happy Birthday in advance! Have a great birthday!
  • DT Linda Gross wrote on his Timeline.
    Dear David, thanks for the add. Welcome aboard!
  • Adrian Spagnuolo wrote on his Timeline.
    If you want , you can be an Editor of MY PAGE again whenever you want and post whatever you want, I already told you I ll be beside you all the way . YOU ARE NOT ALONE- I FIGHT BESIDE YOU AND FOR YOUR CASE EVERY DAY DEAR FRIEND!!
  • Michael Pasierb wrote on his Timeline.
    I keep writing the today show to help promote Parental Alienation to no avail. What if we all hold a bubbles of love event on the plaza April 25th. I am trying to fund raise for a plane ticket. Who else will commit to be there?
  • Glen Gibellina wrote on his Timeline.
    Cherie Safapou wrote on his Timeline.
    Justices for mother and son. Please sign to stop court crimes. Family law has become an absolute embarassment to honest and moral behavior. we will fix it for you. Injustice in the justice system | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government  petitions.whitehouse.gov
  • William Davey Farmer wrote on his Timeline.
    No Visitation Agreement Ever Issued
    Njideka N. Olatunde - Visionary Leader for Focus On Healing Wellness Institute

    How can a noncustodial parent have visitation when no agreement was submitted with the divorce and custody order? Mother awarded custody with father being given liberal visitation. Mother dictates visitation schedule however she wants.

    At the present time there is no visitation with minor child and communication access is blocked by the custodial parent.

    What does the father need to do to get a visitation schedule?  
    If all the final order says is dad has "liberal visitation" then it is not a complete order.

    Dad has to file a lawsuit to demand a specific "liberal visitation" schedule that mom has to abide by.

    Dad should also politely send emails requesting visitation, and let mom look ridiculous when she denies or gives ridiculous options for dad to follow.

    He needs to file for specific visitation rights with the court, which means filing a lawsuit to get the court to issue a specific order.

    Thank you. The father has filed a motion for custody and visitation with a request for a hearing date. The father is waiting to hear from the court.

    Stand Up for the Week
    Stand Up for the Week (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
  • Adrian Spagnuolo wrote on his Timeline.
    Thank you very much for sharing your friendship for our common goal and do not forget to post in our page along with Scott in DERECHOS DE LOS HIJOS DE PADRES SEPARADOS , you are already an editor as our friend
  • Cherie Safapou wrote on his Timeline.
    Please sign to stop court crimes. Family law has become an absolute embarassment to honest and moral behavior. we will fix it for you. Injustice in the justice system | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government
    petitions.whitehouse.gov
  • Tony Robinson wrote on his Timeline.
    Thank you
  • Sheila George wrote on his Timeline.
    I am attending with out A doubt. The reason I am writing on your page is because you sent me 3-4 request already. LORD willing unless there is A snow storm in florida I will be there and thanks for reminding and sending me the message. Have A blessed day


13 comments:

  1. Post on Gov Scott's Facebook page and ask him to sign SB718/HB231 for Florida’s Children and Parents Or tweet him @FLGovScott
    Florida is finally starting something for our children and it's all because of Sen. Tom Lee. He has been fighting in court with his ex-wife like most men over his rights as a father. It has now taken a person in a Legislative office to go through what many men are undertaking daily to change the way our courts see our fathers. Now, with this bill on the table our children may have a chance but, many have made the statement that this bill will be a cookie cutter approach to a long standing problem. Our children need relief and our fathers want their children. We need to stand together as a family in the fight for our children. "It takes a village to raise a child" (Confussia) I beleive It takes the whole world to change our court.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HOW DID CHILDREN OF DIVORCE GET STUCK WITH THE VISITATION PLAN THAT AFFORDS THEM ACCESS TO THEIR NON-RESIDENTIAL PARENT ONLY ONE NIGHT DURING THE WEEK AND EVERY OTHER WEEK-END?

      What is the research that supports such a schedule? Where is the data that confirms that such a plan is in the best interest of the child?

      Well, reader, you can spend your time from now until eternity researching the literature and YOU WILL NOT DISCOVER ANY SUPPORTING DATA for the typical visitation arrangement with the non-residential parent! The reality is that this arrangement is based solely on custom. And just like the short story, "The Lottery," in which the prizewinner is stoned to death, the message is that deeds and judgments are frequently arrived at based on nothing more than habit, fantasy, prejudice, and yes, on "junk science."

      This family therapist upholds the importance of both parents playing an active and substantial role in their children's lives----especially in situations when the parents are apart. In order to support the goal for each parent to provide a meaningfully and considerable involvement in the lives of their children, I affirm that the resolution to custody requires an arrangement for joint legal custody and physical custody that maximizes the time with the non-residential----with the optimal arrangement being 50-50, whenever practical. It is my professional opinion that the customary visitation arrangement for non-residential parents to visit every other weekend and one night during the week is not sufficient to maintain a consequential relationship with their children. Although I have heard matrimonial attorneys, children's attorneys, and judges assert that the child needs the consistency of the same residence, I deem this assumption to be nonsense. I cannot be convinced that the consistency with one's bed trumps consistency with a parent!

      Should the reader question how such an arrangement can be judiciously implemented which maximizes the child's time---even in a 50-50 arrangement----with the non-residential parent, I direct the reader to the book, Mom's House, Dads House, by the Isolina Ricci, PhD.

      Indeed, the research that we do have supports the serious consequences to children when the father, who is generally the non-residential parent, does not play a meaningful role in lives of his children. The book, Fatherneed, (2000) by Dr. Kyle Pruitt, summarizes the research at Yale University about the importance of fathers to their children. And another post on this page summarizes an extensive list of other research.

      Children of divorce or separation of their parents previously had each parent 100% of the time and obviously cannot have the same arrangement subsequent to their parents' separation. But it makes no sense to this family therapist that the result of parental separation is that the child is accorded only 20% time with one parent and 80% with the other. What rational person could possibly justify this?

      Delete
    2. FLORIDA TODAY - OPINION
      Written by Gordon E. Finley, Ph.D., Miami

      While I applaud columnist Paul Flemming for a sound review of the issues in Saturday’s “Alimony bill will be great — for lawyers,” his bottom-line conclusion is dead wrong.

      The proposed state alimony reform bill will reduce litigation, not increase litigation. A bit of history: For years, the divorce vultures (a.k.a., the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar) have conned the Florida Legislature into writing divorce legislation that maximizes litigation and thus maximizes their income. In part, they have accomplished this by maximizing judicial discretion, which in practice means endless conflict and, of course, endless paid litigation.

      No matter what they may say, the divorce vultures are interested only in one thing — maximizing their income.

      I can irrefutably demonstrate this point with Flemming’s own words: “Thomas Duggar, an attorney in Tallahassee and a member of the Florida Bar’s Family Law Section, said last week at a Tallahassee Bar Association meeting that the section has a $100,000 war chest to sway public opinion against the legislation.”

      Do your readers honestly believe they are spending all this money so they will lose income? The divorce vultures get the message in terms of what alimony reform will cost them — and save the children, fathers and mothers of divorce. I regret Mr. Flemming did not do the same.

      Full Disclosure: I am an alimony-paying divorced father of two young adult daughters and retired university divorce researcher with multiple research and scholarly publications on this topic.

      Delete
  2. “As my sufferings mounted I soon realized that there were two ways in which I could respond to my situation -- either to react with bitterness or seek to transform the suffering into a creative force. I decided to follow the latter course.” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Relationship Estrangement and Interference is a form of Domestic Violence using Psychological abuse.”
      ~ Joan Kloth-Zanard of PAS Intervention.
      www.pas-intervention.com‎
      PAS Intervention stands for Parental Alienation Support and Intervention. It is an International Non-profit organization to End Child Abuse and Parental Alienation.
      The International Access and Visitation Centers conference was held in Toronto. The Parental Alienation Awareness Organization was there and spoke to most of the 200 or so practitioners. Of course all were familiar with alienation and its results. Everyone was not only gratified to see PAAO at the event; they all also acknowledged that PA is either a form of Domestic Violence or on the continuum of Domestic Violence behaviors.

      Delete
  3. "An honorable defeat is better than a dishonorable victory." ~ Millard Fillmore

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Friends,

    One in six Americans know someone who has been falsely accused of domestic violence. The silver bullets in divorce, false allegations are sometimes used to obtain child custody. This despicable act removes fit and loving parents from the lives of their children.

    Please take a moment, as soon as possible, and speak out for the millions of children who are missing a falsely accused parent. And do it for the parents who are grieving for their children, stolen with a lie.

    Find your senators here:
    http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

    Take note of their party affiliation and phone number.

    If your senator is a Republican, call, and ask them to support Sen. Grassley's Substitute Amendment to VAWA.

    If your senator is a Democrat, call, and ask them to demand changes to Sen. Leahy's VAWA (S. 1925), to curb false allegations of domestic violence.

    Do it For the Children, Stolen with a Lie

    Thank you for taking a stand for affected families everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Normal parents can put the needs of their children first. They know that demeaning and demonizing their partner harms the children, and however they may feel, they do not want to harm their children. The problem of brainwashing children arises when one or other parent or both put their needs first and use the children as weapons against each other. These are the adults who have personality disorders that go unrecognized in court. There both parents are given an equal hearing the problem occurs when one parent lies and cheats under oath, manipulates the judiciary and everyone in the case while the normal parent looks on in horror. Women will always be given the benefit of the doubt over men especially by men which is why so many men loose their children. The training of so called experts in the universities and in workshops has been in the hands of radical feminists for the last forty years as a result there is no level playing field between parents any longer. All I can say that I have seen children deprived of a loving parent reconnect after years of demonizing that parent. For other parents they have to live with the injustice for the rest of their lives their child or children are to damaged to ever know the truth." ~ Erin Pizzey

    ReplyDelete
  6. Presumptive Best Interest of Child and Equal Time-Sharing

    There is no question that our family law statutes need to be reformed and that there is a great deal of "judicial discretion" in family law matters. Often times, the outcome of your case depends more on the judge that you have been assigned than the facts of your particular case. If you were to have your case in front of one judge, the outcome may be very different if you were to have your case in front of a different judge. The legislature is trying to change that, in particular when it comes to time-sharing with children. There are changes to alimony as well that I will address in a later blog, but I wanted my readers to be aware of the changes that are being proposed for time-sharing because it is substantial. If the Bill passes, there will now be a presumption that equal (50/50) time-sharing is in a child's best interest, with very limited exceptions. The exceptions would be in the nature of real harm to a child that a parent is incarcerated, a parent is unfit, or the parent's geographical distance would hinder the ability for a 50/50 time-sharing schedule to work. If this passes and is signed into law, most families would be automatically forced into a 50/50 timesharing arrangement if one party were to want that. I have had plenty of cases in the past and some cases right now where one parent does not want an equal time-sharing schedule for a variety of different reasons. Some reasons are valid; some reasons are not valid enough to take the issue before the Court. With this new law, if it is passed, every family will be forced into a 50/50 schedule provided that one parent is requesting it. We do a lot of 50/50 time-sharing arrangements and have had a Judge rule many times that 50/50 is what a couple is going to have, but there are many families who want to alter or adjust this schedule after the final hearing because the schedule is simply not working. Absent a substantial and permanent change of circumstances, couples are going to be stuck with these schedules, regardless of whether or not it’s "working". I agree with the idea that if we have a presumption that 50/50 is in the children's best interest, there will be less room for argument and people would have to acquiesce on this issue. Taking any argument off the table that 50/50 is not good because a parent simply doesn't want it will help insure that less litigation ensues over "best interest of the children". However, what I don't agree with is that we should take the approach of "one size fits all" when it comes to dealing with children. It'll be interesting to see how this develops and if you have issue with this potential law, I urge you to contact your representative. By Christine Bauer - A Florida Family Law Attorney
    Posted FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 2013

    ReplyDelete
  7. PRO SE RIGHTS:
    Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425 ~ Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings.

    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957) ~ "Following the simple guide of rule 8(f) that all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits." The court also cited Rule 8(f) FRCP, which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice.

    Davis v. Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. California, 283 U.S. 359; NAACP v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 449 ~ "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, are not to be defeated under the name of local practice."

    Elmore v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905 ~ "... the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."

    Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ~ A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest.

    Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) ~ "Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however inartfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."

    Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233 ~ Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.

    Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938) ~ "Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."

    NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) ~ Members of groups who are competent nonlawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law."

    Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeals ~ The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."

    Puckett v. Cox, 456 F. 2d 233 (1972) (6th Cir. USCA) ~ It was held that a pro se complaint requires a less stringent reading than one drafted by a lawyer per Justice Black in Conley v. Gibson (see case listed above, Pro Se Rights Section).

    Roadway Express v. Pipe, 447 U.S. 752 at 757 (1982) ~ "Due to sloth, inattention or desire to seize tactical advantage, lawyers have long engaged in dilatory practices... the glacial pace of much litigation breeds frustration with the Federal Courts and ultimately, disrespect for the law."

    Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973) ~ "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights."

    Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. ~ "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State."

    Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) ~ "The practice of law is an occupation of common right."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Intimidation of Pro-Se Litigants
    The attitude of court officers toward pro-se litigants ranges from condescending to openly hostile, and when pro se's oppose an experienced attorney, they are often dispatched before having the opportunity to properly present their case. In the following article, investigative reporter Sherman Skolnick describes a scenario he has witnessed.

    Big Court Fix

    Part 1: Introduction to what you need to know

    SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK
    Here is the start of what you need to know about the courts. This applies primarily to state and federal civil cases in bigger communities and cities. And please note, not EVERY court case is corrupt. Maybe one out of twenty, or one out of forty. But after you study this series, you might become more skilled in telling which is which.
    In civil cases, judges usually designate a certain day at a certain time when they have "Motion Call." That means they put on the docket for that day a list of cases where motions (parts of cases) are to be heard.
    So suppose you are a plaintiff, representing yourself against a defendant corporation or a politician or other important personality. You check the computer-generated Motion Call list taped to the wall outside the courtroom door.
    You notice that you are among the first cases to be heard that morning. The judge is not yet on the bench. The defendant's attorney is at the desk, next to the bench, whispering to the deputy clerk.
    The judge comes in, gets on the bench, and your case is among the first called. The clerk, or the judge himself, announces that your case will be heard "at the end of the call," which means you will have to wait in the courtroom for several hours, perhaps close to lunch-time.
    Non-lawyers tend to call the other side, "the enemy." So your enemy's attorney goes out into the hallway with his cell phone. You follow him and ask, "You were whispering to the clerk before the Motion Call started. And when the judge got on the bench, my case was pushed to the end. What is going on?"
    The enemy's "mouthpiece" does not respond. So you raise your voice and repeat the question. Suddenly, the deputy sheriff (state court) or deputy U.S. marshal (federal court) stationed in the courtroom comes out and comes up to you.
    "If you don't stop threatening counsel, I am going to have to arrest you," he warns. Outraged at being falsely accused, you raise your voice to who in past years was called the court bailiff. He barks at you, "Get away from counsel, or I will arrest you."
    You reluctantly walk away from the "counsel" and the "bailiff". You begin thinking to yourself, "Hey, what's going on here anyway?"
    You go back into the courtroom and wait. Before the clerk calls your case, all the other motions have been heard and the court has been cleared out.
    Suddenly, the bailiff goes to the courtroom door and locks it. If you are savvy, you look at the judge's face now. It is not more or less relaxed as you saw it during the Motion Call. After all, the judge often hobnobs socially with some of the same lawyers who were there during the Motion Call. He goes to golfing events with them from time to time. The judge sees many of the same attorneys at Bar Association luncheons and pep-talk meetings, where they pat themselves on the back for the great system of justice they are in. You think, "It is the wonderfully corrupt bench and the bar." And YOU are no part of it.
    So now it is just you, your enemy's counsel, the judge, the clerk, and the bailiff. If you have been around the courts before, you know to notice that the judge's face is now a little red. Although judges practice to show no expression about which way they are going to rule, they are still human and it sometimes does show in their face when a particularly difficult or clout-heavy case is to be heard.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "CHILDREN OF DIVORCE DESERVE FULL ACCESS TO BOTH PARENTS, WHENEVER POSSIBLE."
    Personally, I can’t find anyone willing to reject that statement publicly. It’s a fundamental truth. We now have a wealth of evidence demonstrating children are better off, in most situations, when they have something near equal time with each parent. So why are shared-parenting bills are being rejected throughout the country?

    Do legislators believe mothers are more important to children than fathers? For the most part, I don’t think so. Politicians are, however, under quite a bit of pressure from some very powerful anti-shared parenting special interests. Recently, we’ve seen these opponents contribute to shared-parenting bills failing to pass in South Dakota and Minnesota.

    Some would argue disappointments like those are clear signs that shared parenting legislation will not happen anytime soon. The opposite is true. The near victories in these states and others is an enormous indication politicians are beginning to understand the vast majority of American citizens believe children of divorce deserve equal access to both parents, whenever possible.

    In fact, South Dakota’s bill lost in a 21-13 Senate vote. That’s a swing of 5 senators. If merely 5 senators felt more pressure from South Dakotans than they did from special interests, South Dakota would have a shared parenting statute. We should commend the remaining politicians in South Dakota’s Senate for doing the right thing.

    In Minnesota … well, Minnesota is a travesty. That bill passed, and on May 24, 2012 Governor Mark Dayton vetoed it. Governor Dayton claimed that both sides made “compelling arguments,” but because the “ramifications” of the legislation were “uncertain,” he decided to single-handedly overrule the will of his constituents and their representatives. Mr. Governor, unless you are ending slavery or beginning women’s suffrage, you will likely never have the benefit of “certainty” in your political career. Again, we should praise the Minnesotan politicians who voted for the bill.

    Six people. Six people stopped two states from enacting shared parenting. Six people do not indicate shared parenting is a distant hope – they indicate profoundly that it is an imminent inevitability.

    Mike Haskell is a divorced dad, shared parenting supporter and practicing family law attorney in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

    ACFC is America's Shared Parenting Organization

    "CHILDREN NEED BOTH PARENTS"

    The members of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children dedicate ourselves to the creation of a family law system and public awareness which promotes equal rights for ALL parties affected by issues of the modern family.

    ACFC is challenging the current system of American family law and policy. Through a national system of local affiliates and in alliance with other pro-family and civil liberties groups, ACFC is shifting the public debate to the real causes of family dissolution.

    ReplyDelete
  10. “Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…” ~ Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.

    Redress, Inc. 501c3 nonprofit corporation, created to combat corruption. Our purpose is to provide real assistance and solutions for citizens suffering from injustices. We operate as a formal business, with a Board of Directors guiding us. We take the following actions to seek redress: Competently organize as citizens working for the enforcement of our legal rights. Form a coalition so large and so effective that the authorities can no longer ignore us. We support and align with other civil rights groups and get our collective voices heard. Work to pass laws that benefit us and give us the means to fight against corruption, as is our legal right, and we work to repeal laws that are in violation of our legal rights. Become proactive in the election process, by screening of political candidates. As individuals, we support those who are striving to achieve excellence, and show how to remove from office those who have failed to get the job done. Make our presence known through every legal means. We monitor our courts and judges. We petition our government representatives for the assistance they are bound to provide us. We publicize our cases and demand redress. Create a flow of income that enables us to fight back in court, and to assist our members impoverished by the abuses inflicted on us. Create the means to relieve the stresses on us, as we share information and support each other. We become legal advocates for each other; we become an emotional support network for each other; we problem solve for individuals on a group basis! Educate our judges, lawyers, court personnel, law enforcement personnel and elected leaders about our rights as citizens! Actively work to eliminate incompetence, bias/prejudice, special relationships and corruption at all levels of government! Work actively with all media sources, to shed light on our efforts. It is reasonable to expect that if the authorities know we are watching and documenting, that their behaviors will improve. IT'S A HUGE TASK! Accountability will not happen overnight. But we believe that through supporting each other, we support ourselves. This results in a voice for justice and redress that cannot be ignored. Please become familiar with our web site, and feel free to call. We need each other - help us to help you! Although we are beginning operations in Nevada, we intend to extend into each state in a competent fashion. We are NOT attorneys, unless individual attorneys join us as members. We are simply people helping people. For those interested, we do not engage in the practice of law. You might be interested in this article Unauthorized Practice of Law on the Net. Call Redress, Inc. at 702.597.2982 or e-mail us at Redress@redressinc.com. WORKING TOGETHER TO ATTAIN FAIRNESS

    ReplyDelete

Take Action Now!

Children's Rights Florida

Florida Family Law Reform

Family Law Community

Search This Blog

American Coalition for Fathers and Children

Means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.

Abuse (7) Abuse of power (1) Abuse of process (5) Admission to practice law (3) Adversarial system (79) Advocacy group (3) African American (1) Alienator (1) Alimony (7) All Pro Dad (1) All rights reserved (1) Allegation (2) Alliance for Justice (2) American Civil Liberties Union (3) American Psychological Association (1) Americans (2) Anecdotal evidence (2) Anti-discrimination law (1) Arrest (1) Bar association (1) Best interests (41) Bill (law) (1) British Psychological Society (1) Broward County (1) Broward County Public Schools (2) Brown University (1) Catholic Church (1) Center for Public Integrity (2) Chief judge (25) Child Abuse (48) Child custody (76) Child development (6) Child neglect (2) Child protection (15) Child Protective Services (18) Child Support (61) Children (3) Children's Rights (83) Christine Lagarde (1) Christmas (3) Circuit court (3) Civil and political rights (14) Civil law (common law) (1) Civil liberties (9) Civil Rights (143) Civil rights movement (1) Class action (1) Communist Party of Cuba (1) Confidentiality (1) Constitutional law (1) Constitutional right (5) Contact (law) (10) Contempt of court (2) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (1) Coparenting (27) Copyright (1) Copyright infringement (1) Corruption (1) Court Enabled PAS (90) Court order (2) Cuba (1) Cuban Missile Crisis (1) Cuban Revolution (1) Custodial Parent (1) Declaratory judgment (3) Denial of Reasonable Parent-Child Contact (109) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2) Divorce (121) Divorce Corp (3) Divorce Court (1) Documentary (22) Domestic Violence (51) Dr. Stephen Baskerville (5) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1) DSM-5 (1) DSM-IV Codes (1) Due Process (44) Due Process Clause (1) Dwyane Wade (1) Easter (1) Equal-time rule (2) Ethics (1) Events (9) Exposé (group) (1) Facebook (19) Fair use (1) False accusation (4) False Accusations (56) Family (1) Family (biology) (2) Family Court (192) Family Law (107) Family Law Reform (115) Family Rights (86) Family therapy (10) Father (12) Father figure (2) Father's Day (1) Father's Rights (12) Fatherhood (105) Fatherlessness Epidemic (4) Fathers 4 Justice (3) Fathers' rights movement (44) Fidel Castro (1) Florida (209) Florida Attorney General (6) Florida Circuit Courts (18) florida lawyers (29) Florida Legislature (6) Florida Senate (10) Foster care (1) Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1) Fraud (1) Free Speech (1) Freedom of speech (1) Frivolous litigation (1) Fundamental rights (12) Gender equality (1) Government Accountability Project (2) Government interest (2) Grandparent (3) Havana (1) Healthy Children (14) Human Rights (117) Human rights commission (1) I Love My Daughter (55) I Love My Son (8) Injunction (1) Innocence Project (1) Investigative journalism (1) Jason Patric (2) JavaScript (1) Joint custody (8) Joint custody (United States) (16) Judge (4) Judge Judy (7) Judge Manno-Schurr (53) Judicial Accountability (100) Judicial Immunity (6) Judicial misconduct (8) Judicial Reform (3) Judicial Watch (2) Judiciary (3) Jury trial (1) Kids for cash scandal (1) Law (1) Lawsuit (8) Lawyer (8) Legal Abuse (147) Liar Joel Greenberg (15) Linda Gottlieb (1) Litigant in person (1) Little Havana (1) Marriage (6) Matt O'Connor (1) Men's rights movement (1) Mental disorder (1) Mental health (2) Meyer v. Nebraska (1) Miami (43) Miami-Dade County (8) Miami-Dade County Public Schools (1) Miscarriage of justice (40) Mother (4) Motion of no confidence (1) Movie (4) Music (8) Nancy Schaefer (1) National Fatherhood Initiative (1) Natural and legal rights (1) News (86) Nixa Maria Rose (15) Non-governmental organization (1) Noncustodial parent (4) Organizations (56) Palm Beach County (1) Parent (35) Parental Alienation (115) Parental alienation syndrome (15) Parental Rights (36) Parenting (12) Parenting plan (5) Parenting time (7) Parents' rights movement (38) Paternity (law) (1) Personal Story (22) Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1) Pope (1) Posttraumatic stress disorder (27) President of Cuba (1) Pro Se (29) Pro se legal representation in the United States (3) Prosecutor (1) Protest (1) Psychological manipulation (1) Psychologist (1) Public accommodations (1) Public Awareness (105) Raúl Castro (1) Re-Post/Re-Blog (12) Research (1) Restraining order (4) Rick Scott (12) Second-class citizen (1) Self Representation-Pro Se (31) Sexism (1) Sexual abuse (2) Sexual assault (1) Shared Parenting (90) Single parent (6) Skinner v. Oklahoma (1) Social Issues (57) Social Media (1) Spanish (8) Stand Up For Zoraya (46) State school (1) Student (1) Supreme Court of Florida (7) Supreme Court of the United States (5) Testimony (23) Thanksgiving (1) The Florida Bar (9) The Good Men Project (1) Trauma (4) Troxel v. Granville (1) True Story (21) Turner v. Rogers (1) United States (24) United States Congress (1) United States Constitution (1) United States Department of Justice (4) Videos (50) Violence Against Women Act (1) Whistle-blower (3)