A self-censored chronicle of family court dramas, lived by parents who lost all or some visitation with or custody of a child or children based on perjury and/or other false courtroom evidence
Father Factor in Poverty ~Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more
likely to be poor. In 2011, 12 percent of children in married-couple families
were living in poverty, compared to 44 percent of children in mother-only
families.
Source: U.S.
Census Bureau, Children’s Living Arrangements and Characteristics: March 2011,
Table C8. WashingtonD.C.: 2011. In 2008, American poverty rates were 13.2% for the whole
population and 19% for children, compared to 28.7% for female-headed
households. Source: Edin, K. & Kissane R. J. (2010). Poverty
and the American family: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family,
72, 460-479.
Father Factor in Emotional and Behavioral Problems ~Data from three waves of the Fragile Families Study (N=
2,111) was used to examine the prevalence and effects of mothers’ relationship
changes between birth and age 3 on their children’s well being. Children born
to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born
to married mothers. Living in a single-mother household is equivalent to
experiencing 5.25 partnership transitions.
Source: Osborne, C., & McLanahan, S. (2007). Partnership
instability and child well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1065-1083
A sample of 4,027 resident fathers and children from the
Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Survey was used to investigate the
effects of a biological father’s multipartner fertility (having at least one
child with more than one mother) on adolescent health. Resident fathers
engaging in multipartner fertility were older, more likely to be White, and had
lower education levels and income, compared to fathers with one partner.
Results indicated children’s externalizing behaviors were negatively affected
directly and indirectly when their biological father had children with multiple
partners. Source: Bronte-Tinkew, J., Horowitz, A., & Scott, M. E.
(2009). Fathering with multiple partners: Links to children’s well-being in
early childhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 608–631.
Father Factor in Maternal and Child Health ~ Infant mortality rates are 1.8 times higher for infants of
unmarried mothers than for married mothers.
Source: Matthews, T.J., Sally C. Curtin, and Marian F.
MacDorman. Infant Mortality Statistics from the 1998 Period Linked Birth/Infant
Death Data Set. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 48, No. 12. Hyattsville, MD: NationalCenter for Health Statistics, 2000. High-quality interaction by any type of father predicts
better infant health. Source: Carr, D. & Springer, K. W. (2010). Advances in
families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and
Family, 72, 743-761. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and maternal and child health
Father Factor in Incarceration ~
Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent
households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in
mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household
experienced the highest odds.
Source: Harper, Cynthia C. and Sara S. McLanahan. “Father
Absence and Youth Incarceration.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 14
(September 2004): 369-397. A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates
revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately
forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family
member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail. Source: James, Doris J. Profile of Jail Inmates, 2002.
(NCJ 201932). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Department of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, July 2004. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and incarceration
Father Factor in Crime ~ A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family
structure significantly predicts delinquency.
Source: Bush, Connee, Ronald L. Mullis, and Ann K. Mullis.
“Differences in Empathy Between Offender and Nonoffender Youth.” Journal of
Youth and Adolescence 29 (August 2000): 467-478. A study of low-income minority adolescents aged 10-14 years
found that higher social encounters and frequent communication with nonresident
biological fathers decreased adolescent delinquency. Source: Coley, R. L., & Medeiros, B. L. (2007).
Reciprocal longitudinal relations between nonresident father involvement and
adolescent delinquency. Child Development, 78, 132–147. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and crime
Father Factor in Teen Pregnancy & Sexual Activity ~
Being raised by a single mother raises the risk of teen
pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and forming a marriage
where both partners have less than a high school degree. Source: Teachman, Jay D. “The Childhood Living Arrangements
of Children and the Characteristics of Their Marriages.” Journal of Family
Issues 25 (January 2004): 86-111. Separation or frequent changes increase a woman’s risk of
early menarche, sexual activity and pregnancy. Women whose parents separated
between birth and six years old experienced twice the risk of early
menstruation, more than four times the risk of early sexual intercourse, and
two and a half times higher risk of early pregnancy when compared to women in
intact families. The longer a woman lived with both parents, the lower her risk
of early reproductive development. Women who experienced three or more changes
in her family environment exhibited similar risks but were five times more
likely to have an early pregnancy. Source: Quinlan, Robert J. “Father absence, parental care,
and female reproductive development.” Evolution and Human Behavior 24 (November
2003): 376-390. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and teen pregnancy.
Father Factor in Child Abuse ~
A study using data from the Fragile Families and Child
Wellbeing Study revealed that in many cases the absence of a biological father
contributes to increased risk of child maltreatment. The results suggest that
Child Protective Services (CPS) agencies have some justification in viewing the
presence of a social father as increasing children’s risk of abuse and neglect.
It is believed that in families with a non-biological (social) father figure,
there is a higher risk of abuse and neglect to children, despite the social
father living in the household or only dating the mother. Source: “CPS Involvement in Families with Social Fathers.”
Fragile Families Research Brief No.46. Princeton,
NJ and New York,
NY: Bendheim-ThomasCenter for Research on Child Wellbeing
and SocialIndicatorsSurveyCenter, 2010. In a study examining father-related factors predicting
maternal physical child abuse risk, researchers conducted interviews with
mothers of 3-year-old children. The results revealed that mothers who were
married to fathers were at lower risk for maternal physical child abuse.
Moreover, it was found that higher educational attainment and positive father
involvement with their children were significant predictors of lower maternal
physical child abuse risk. Source: Guterman, N.B., Yookyong, L., Lee, S. J., Waldfogel,
J., & Rathouz, P. J. (2009). Fathers and maternal risk for physical child
abuse. Child Maltreatment, 14, 277-290. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and child abuse and neglect.
Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse ~
Even after controlling for community context, there is
significantly more drug use among children who do not live with their mother
and father. Source: Hoffmann, John P. “The Community Context of Family
Structure and Adolescent Drug Use.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64 (May
2002): 314-330. In a study of 6,500 children from the ADDHEALTH database,
father closeness was negatively correlated with the number of a child’s friends
who smoke, drink, and smoke marijuana. Closeness was also correlated with a
child’s use of alcohol, cigarettes, and hard drugs and was connected to family
structure. Intact families ranked higher on father closeness than single-parent
families. Source: National Fatherhood Initiative. “Family Structure,
Father Closeness, & Drug Abuse.” Gaithersburg,
MD: National Fatherhood
Initiative, 2004: 20-22. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and drug abuse.
Father Factor in Childhood Obesity ~
The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth found that obese
children are more likely to live in father-absent homes than are non-obese
children. Source: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. In a study using a sample of 2,537 boys and 2,446 girls,
researchers investigated the relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI) status
at ages 4 to 5 years and mothers’ and fathers’ parenting involvement and
parenting styles. The results showed that only fathers’ parenting behaviors and
styles were associated with increased risks of child overweight and obesity.
Mothers’ parenting behaviors and styles were not associated with a higher
likelihood of children being in a higher BMI category. In the case of fathers,
however, higher father control scores were correlated with lower chances of the
child being in a higher BMI category. Moreover, children of fathers with
permissive and disengaged parenting styles had higher odds of being in a higher
BMI category. Source: Wake, M., Nicholson, J.M., Hardy, P., & Smith,
K. (2007). Preschooler obesity and parenting styles of mothers and fathers:
Australian national population study, Pediatrics, 12, 1520-1527. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and childhood obesity.
Father Factor in Education ~
Father involvement in schools is associated with the higher
likelihood of a student getting mostly A's. This was true for fathers in
biological parent families, for stepfathers, and for fathers heading
single-parent families.
Source: Nord, Christine Winquist, and Jerry West. Fathers’
and Mothers’ Involvement in Their Children’s Schools by Family Type and
Resident Status. (NCES 2001-032). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Education, NationalCenter for Education
Statistics, 2001. A study assessing 4,109 two-parent families examined the
effects of early maternal and paternal depression on child expressive language
at age 24 months and the role that parent-to-child reading may play in child’s
language development. The results revealed that for mothers and fathers,
depressive symptoms were negatively associated with parent-to-child reading.
Only for fathers, however, was earlier depression associated with later reading
to child and related child expressive vocabulary development. The less the
fathers read to their infants, the worse their toddler scored on a standard
measure of expressive vocabulary at age two. Parents’ depression has more
impact on how often fathers read to their child compared to mothers, which in
turn influences the child’s language development. Source: Paulson, J.F., Keefe, H.A., & Leiferman, J. A.
(2009). Early parental depression and child language development. Journal of
Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 254–262. Click here to access additional, free research on father absence and education.
Some would argue that America is rapidly becoming a fatherless society, or perhaps more accurately, an absentee father society.The importance and influence of fathers in families has been in significant decline since theIndustrial Revolution and is now reaching critical proportions. The near-total absence of male role models has ripped a hole the size of half the population in many urban areas. For example, in Baltimore, only 38 percent of families have two parents, and in St. Louisthe portion is 40 percent.
Across time and cultures, fathers have always been considered essential—and not just for their sperm. Indeed, no known society ever thought of fathers as potentially unnecessary.Marriage and the nuclear family—mother, father, and children—are the most universal social institutions in existence. In no society has the birth of children out of wedlock been the cultural norm. To the contrary, concern for the legitimacy of children is nearly universal.
As Alexander Mitscherlich argues in Society Without A Father(link is external), there has been a “progressive loss of the father’s authority and diminution of his power in the family and over the family.”
“If present trends continue, writes David Popenoe(link is external), a professor of sociology at Rutgers University, “the percentage ofAmericanchildren living apart from their biological fathers will reach 50% by the next century.” He argues “this massive erosion of fatherhood contributes mightily to many of the major social problems of our time…Fatherless children have a risk factor of two to three times that of fathered children for a wide range of negative outcomes, including dropping out of high school, giving birth as a teenager and becoming a juvenile delinquent.”
72% of adolescent murderers grew up without fathers. 60% of America’s rapists grew up the same way according to a study by D. Cornell (et al.), in Behavioral Sciences and the Law;
63% of 1500 CEOs and human resource directors said it was not reasonable for a father to take a leave after the birth of a child;
71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes according to the National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools;
80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes according to a report in Criminal Justice & Behavior;
In single-mother families in the U.S. about 66% of young children live in poverty;
90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes;
Children from low-income, two-parent families outperform students from high-income, single-parent homes. Almost twice as many high achievers come from two-parent homes as one-parent homes according to a study by the Charles F. Kettering Foundation.
85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes according to a study by the Center for Disease Control;
Of all violent crimes against women committed by intimates about 65% were committed by either boy-friends or ex-husbands, compared with 9 % by husbands;
Girls living with non-natal fathers (boyfriends and stepfathers) are at higher risk for sexual abuse than girls living with natal fathers;
Daughters of single mothers are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 111% more likely to have children as teenagers, 164% more likely to have a premarital birth and 92% more likely to dissolve their own marriages.
A large survey conducted in the late 1980s found that about 20% of divorced fathers had not seen his children in the past year, and that fewer than 50% saw their children more than a few times a year.
Juvenile crime, the majority of which is committed by males, has increased six-fold since 1992;
In a longitudinal study of 1,197 fourth-grade students, researchers observed “greater levels of aggression in boys from mother-only households than from boys in mother-father households,” according to a study published in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.
The Scholastic Aptitude Test scores have declined more than 70 points in the past two decades; children in single-parent families tend to score lower on standardized tests and to receive lower grades in school according to a Congressional Research Service Report.
Blankenhorn argues that America is facing not just the loss of fathers, but also the erosion of the ideal of fatherhood. Few people doubt the fundamental importance of mothers, Popenoe comments, but increasingly the question of whether fathers are really necessary is being raised and said by many to be a merely a social role that others-mothers, partners, stepfathers, uncles and aunts, and grandparents can play.
“The scale of marital breakdowns in the West since 1960 has no historical precedent that I know of,” says Lawrence Tone, a noted Princeton University family historian, “There has been nothing like it for the last 2,000 years, and probably longer.” Consider what has happened to children. Most estimates are that only about 50% of the children born during the 1970-84 “baby bust” period will still live with their natural parents by age 17-a staggering drop from nearly 80%.
Despite current interest in father involvement in families, an extremely large proportion of family research focuses on mothers and children. Health care agencies and other organizations exclude fathers, often unwittingly. Starting with pregnancy and labor and delivery most appointments are set up for mothers and held at times when fathers work.
The same is true for most pediatric visits. School records and files in family service organizations often have the child’s and mother’s name on the label, and not the father’s. In most family agency buildings, the walls are typically pastel colors, the pictures on the wall are of mothers, flowers and babies, the magazines in the waiting room are for women and the staff is predominantly female. In most welfare offices, fathers are not invited to case planning meetings, and when a home visitor is greeted at the door by a man, she often asks to speak with the mother. Given these scenarios, fathers are likely to get the message that they are invisible or irrelevant to their children’s welfare, unless it involves financial support.
Popenoe and others have examined the role of fathers in raising children and found there are significant differences than that for mothers. For example, an often-overlooked dimension of fathering is play. From their children’s birth through adolescence, fathers tend to emphasize play more than caretaking. The play is both physically stimulating and exciting. It frequently resembles an apprenticeship or teaching relationships, and emphasizes often teamwork and competitive testing of abilities. The way fathers play affects everything from the management of emotions to intelligence and academic achievement. It is particularly important in promoting the essential virtue of self-control.
A committee assembled by the Board of Children and Families of the National Research Council, concluded “children learn critical lessons about how to recognize and deal with highly charged emotions in the content of playing with their fathers. Fathers, in effect, give children practice in regulating their own emotions and recognizing others’ emotional clues.”
At play and in other realms, fathers tend to stresscompetition, challenge, initiative, risk taking and independence. Mothers, as caretakers, stress emotional security and personal safety. Father’s involvement seems to be linked to improved quantitative and verbal skills, improved problem-solving ability and higher academic achievement for children. Men also have a vital role to play in promoting cooperation and other “soft” virtues. Involved fathers, it turns out according to one 26 year longitudinal research study may be of special importance for the development of empathy in children.
Family life-marriage and child rearing-is a civilizing force for men. It encourages them to develop prudence, cooperativeness, honesty, trust, self-sacrifice and other habits that can lead to success as an economic provider by setting a good example.
Mark Finn and Karen Henwood, writing about the issue of masculinity and fatherhood, in the British Journal of Social Psychology, argue that the traditional view of masculinity, with its focus on power, aggression, economic security, and “maleness”, and the emerging new view of fatherhood, which incorporates many aspects of motherhood is a source of struggle for many men who become fathers.
In a study of fatherhood in popular TV sitcoms, Timothy Allen Pehlke and his colleagues concluded that fathers are generally shown to be relatively immature, unhelpful and incapable of taking care of themselves in comparison with other family members. In addition, the researchers found that fathers often served as the butt of family members’ jokes. All of these characterizations, while the intention may be humor, depicted fathers as being socially incompetent and objects of derision.
In a study of depictions of fathers in the best selling children’s picture books, researcher Suzanne M. Flannery Quinn concluded that of the 200 books analyzed, there were only 24 books where the father appears alone, and only 35 books where mother and father appear together. The author concludes, “because fathers are not present or prominent in a large number of these books, readers are given only a narrow set of images and ideas from which they can construct an understanding of the cultural expectations of fatherhood and what I means to be a father.”
It seems to me that the issue of the decline of fatherhood and the problem of the male identity crisis are inextricably intertwined.
In my Psychology Today article, “Our male identity crisis: What will happen to men?” I said, “In a post-modern world lacking clear-cut borders and distinctions, it has been difficult to know what it means to be a man and even harder to feel good about being one. The many boundaries of a gendered world built around the opposition of work and family-production versus reproduction, competition versus cooperation, hard vs. soft-have been blurred, and men are groping in the dark for their identity.”
Overwhelmingly, the portrayal of men and the male identity in contemporary western societies is mostly negative. Men today are extensively demonized, marginalized and objectified, in a way reminiscent of what happened to women. The issue of the male identity is of crucial importance because males are falling behind in school, committing more suicides and crimes, dying younger and being treated for conditions such as ADHD more than females.
There has also been a loss of fatherhood in society as artificial insemination by anonymous donors is on the rise. Further, medical experiments have shown that male sperm can now be grown artificially in a laboratory. There has been a rise in divorce rates where in most cases, child custody is granted to mothers. Continuous negative portrayal of men in the media, along with the feminization of men and loss of fatherhood in society, has caused confusion and frustration in younger generation males, as they do not have a specific role model and are less able to define their role in society.
From once being seen as successful breadwinners, heads of families and being respected leaders, men today are the butt of jokes in the popular media. A Canadian research group, Nathanson and Young, conducted research on the changing role of men and media and concluded that widely popular TV programs such as The Simpsons present the father character, Homer, as lazy, chauvinistic, irresponsible, and stupid and his son, Bart, as mischievous, rude and cruel to his sister. By comparison, the mother and daughter are presented as thoughtful, considerate and mild-natured. The majority of TV shows and advertisements present men as stupid buffoons, or aggressive evil tyrants or insensitive and shallow “studs” for women’s pleasure.
According to J.R. Macnamara, in the book, Media(link is external)and the Male Identity: The Making and Remaking of Men(link is external), less than 20% of media profiles reflected positive themes for men. Violent crimes, including murder, assault, and armed robberies accounted for over 55% of all media reporting of male activities. Macnamara says that over 30% of all discussion in the media of male sexuality was in relation to pedophilia, and males’ heterosexuality associated with masculinity is seen as violent, aggressive and dominating. Men are frequently shown in TV shows and movies as lacking in commitment in relationships and are shown as frequently cheating on women. And with increasing frequency, women are shown on TV shows and movies as being independent single mothers, not needing a man.
Guy Garcia, author of The Decline of Men: How The American Male is Tuning Out, Giving Up and Flipping Off His Future,(link is external) argues that many men bemoan a “fragmentation of male identity,” in which husbands are asked to take on unaccustomed familial roles such as child care and housework, while wives bring in the bigger paychecks. “Women really have become the dominant gender,” says Garcia, “what concerns me is that guys are rapidly falling behind. Women are becoming better educated than men, earning more than men, and, generally speaking, not needing men at all. Meanwhile, as a group, men are losing their way.”
“The crisis of fatherhood, then is ultimately a cultural crisis, a sharp decline in the traditional sense of communal responsibly, ” contends Popenoe; “It therefore follows that to rescue the rescue the endangered institution of fatherhood, we must regain our sense of community.”
Beyond that, fathers—men—bring an array of unique and irreplaceable qualities that women do not ordinarily bring. Some of these are familiar, if sometimes overlooked or taken for granted. The father as protector, for example, has by no means outlived his usefulness. And he is important as a role model. Teenage boys without fathers are notoriously prone to trouble. The pathway to adulthood for daughters is somewhat easier, but they still must learn from their fathers, as they cannot from their mothers, how to relate to men. They learn from their fathers about heterosexual trust, intimacy, and difference. They learn to appreciate their own femininity from the one male who is most special in their lives (assuming that they love and respect their fathers). Most important, through loving and being loved by their fathers, they learn that they are worthy of love.
Recent research has given us much deeper—and more surprising—insights into the father’s role in child rearing. It shows that in almost all of their interactions with children, fathers do things a little differently from mothers. What fathers do—their specialparentingstyle—is not only highly complementary to what mothers do but is by all indications important in its own right.
For example, an often-overlooked dimension of fathering is play. From their children’s birth through adolescence, fathers tend to emphasize play more than caretaking. This may be troubling to egalitarian feminists, and it would indeed be wise for most fathers to spend more time in caretaking. Yet the fathers’ style of play seems to have unusual significance. It is likely to be both physically stimulating and exciting. With older children it involves more physical games and teamwork that require the competitive testing of physical and mental skills. It frequently resembles an apprenticeship or teaching relationship: Come on, let me show you how.
The way fathers play affects everything from the management of emotions to intelligence and academic achievement. It is particularly important in promoting the essential virtue of self-control. According to one expert, “Children who roughhouse with their fathers . . . usually quickly learn that biting, kicking, and other forms of physical violence are not acceptable.” They learn when enough is enough.
Children, a committee assembled by the Board on Children and Families of the National Research Council concluded, “learn critical lessons about how to recognize and deal with highly charged emotions in the context of playing with their fathers. Fathers, in effect, give children practice in regulating their own emotions and recognizing others’ emotional clues.” A study of convicted murderers in Texas found that 90 percent of them either didn’t play as children or played abnormally.
So as we annually celebrate Father’s Day, and reflect on it’s importance to social stability, more men in our culture need to find their male identity and commit to the central importance of fatherhood.