Children's Rights
A self-censored chronicle of family court dramas, lived by parents who lost all or some visitation with or custody of a child or children based on perjury and/or other false courtroom evidence
Thursday
Where's Zoraya?
I was hoping and praying that when she turned 18 she would be freed from her mother's grip and psychological abuse. I love her and miss her so much đ„č
Trauma (PTSD) caused by the family court system and Nixa Rose my daughter's mother.
In the family court case Inguanzo vs. Rose from the 11th Judicial Circuit of Miami Dade County you will find out how the family court caused the trauma (PTSD), violated my human rights.and prevented me (for absolutely no reason) from having a normal relationship with my daughter Zoraya. #StandupforZoraya
Saturday
An Alienated Dad
I've been an alienated dad since 2008. Years of mental abuse and legal abuse hit hard emotionally and financially.
The bitterness of my daughter's mother was so horrible she could do the one and only thing that would hurt me the most keep me from my daughter Zoraya.
Diagnosed with CPTSD caused by Parental Alienation of my daughter Zoraya
Parental Alienation is a violation of our 14th Amendment right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness!
Parental Rights is a non profit organization dedicated to providing support and a voice to alienated parents.
Parental Alienation is a tragic form of abuse and domestic violence directed at parents and children during and after divorce or separation.
To protect our future generations and promote positive change we must speak up and stand firm against tyranny in our family courts.
We want to share your story!
Email us:
Alabama ParentalRights@gmail.com
Tuesday
Very Important Petition - ¿Por qué es importante esta petición?
Many fathers have experienced the biases that exist within our family court system. The scales of justice seem to unfairly tip in favor of mothers, marginalizing fathers and limiting our access to our children. This is not just one personâs story, but the story of countless fathers across the country who are fighting for equal rights and access to their children.
Many of us have experienced the heart-wrenching battle of having to fight for years to gain equal rights and access to our children, while the well-being of our little ones hangs in the balance. It is a battle that takes an immense toll on both the fathers and the children involved.
The current laws and biases that govern child custody decisions are outdated and unjust. According to a report from Pew Research Center, as many as 2 million fathers in America do not live with their children (Pew Research Center, 2018). This is often due to biased court decisions rather than lack of desire or ability on part of the fathers.
But we cannot let this continue. We cannot stand idly by as our children suffer the consequences of parental alienation and the absence of a loving, involved father figure in their lives. It is our duty as parents to ensure that our children grow up in an environment where both parents are equally valued and cherished.
Specific case laws and national parental rights court decisions will serve as a guide to our quest for justice. These laws and decisions highlight the importance of creating a petition to the Supreme Court of the United States, where our voices can be heard on a national scale.
For example, the Supreme Court decision in Troxel v. Granville recognized that parents have a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children. This landmark ruling emphasized the importance of parental rights and the need for courts to consider the best interests of the child when making custody determinations. We must use this decision to bolster our argument for equal rights and access.
This issue we want to highlight for fathers goes beyond just parental rights; it's about the well-being of our children too. Studies show that children benefit from having both parents actively involved in their lives (American Psychological Association). Yet, many kids are denied this right due to skewed legal proceedings.
It's time we address this systemic bias against fathers. We need laws that promote equality and fairness when it comes to child custody decisions. We need a system that recognizes the importance of both parents in a child's life.
Join us today by signing this petition demanding equal parental rights for all fathers across America. Our childrenâs lives depend on our hard work and collective efforts. Let us unite against the unjust laws and fight for change together!
Saturday
A FATHER'S ANGUISH
It was difficult to write this.
So I had no desire to revisit them.
The pain I suffer, the fear, and anger I felt (and still feel) toward nearly all the principals involved, and the inescapable sense of hopelessness and isolation exhausted me. However, to live inside the family court matrix, to be engaged in that battle, ultimately means, to be poised to tell my story, to make make my point, to argue my side at a moments notice. It is a fire that is constantly burning.This is an issue that impacts all citizens everywhere. There is a serious problem and health risk in the family courts that ''we the people'' depend on to protect us.

My family court cases are not unique. But what is unique is that I just happen to be the first US citizen (according to a Federal Judge) declared disabled (determined through expert testimony) because of the family courts. In 2016 I began receiving disability benefits because of a diagnosed ''injury'' called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Legal Abuse Syndrome) as the result of fraudulent and abusive legal proceedings in connection to the family court system.
My case is still open and haven't seen my daughter again in almost four years. The wound still remains open.
Let me stress that PTSD(LAS) is an inflicted injury - NOT A MENTAL ILLNESS!!! It's an assault behind the judicial curtains where no one hears you - let alone the judge.
Strangely enough after reaching the point where they (the Family Courts) had burned my rights to the ground leaving no hope of a fair hearing, remedy, and or redress; all denied and out of reach.
I did not despair. Instead I reached the point of empowerment and became a top father's rights activist and found my voice to be revolutionary. That's what happens under tyranny...just look at history.
A court-inflicted injury on those it is supposed to protect should be cause for alarm among all citizens!!
I AM MY DAUGHTER AND SON'S FATHER -- A FIT FATHER!!
Wednesday
2017 International Year of Co-Parenting
Important !
If You Seek a Bio-chemical Cause for Mental Health Disorders, You will become the âLittle Train that Couldnâtâ
If You Seek a Bio-chemical Cause for Mental Health Disorders, You will become the âLittle Train that Couldnâtâ
By Linda J. Gottlieb, LMFT, LCSW-r
My opinion on the origin of mental illness is controversial to many in my profession. I maintain that emotional disturbances are situationally and not bio-chemically caused. But this position did not originate with me. It originated with my mentor, Salvador Minuchin, the world-renowned, highly respected child psychiatrist. Dr. Minuchin (as with his contemporaneous psychiatrists who founded the family therapy movement, such as Murray Bowen, Don Jackson, Jay Haley, Carl Whitaker, Nathan Ackerman, John Weakland, et al.) does not accept an intra-psychic or biochemical cause of mental disorders. Resulting from 65 years of practice, Dr. Minuchin affirms that traumatic situations; unhealthy relationships; and dysfunctional family dynamics, such as the PAS, cause mental health disorders. Diagnosis of mental health is not a science! There is no empirical evidence for any mental health disorder. You cannot inject the brain, withdraw serum, and have it analyzed. Any psychiatrist or mental health diagnostician worth his/her salt (and even those who are not worth their salt) must acknowledge that diagnosis of emotional disorders is based merely upon âimpressions.â
Mental health patients are guinea pigs when they are prescribed an array of psychotropic medications and subjected to a host of invasive procedures, such as ECT. At least Dr. Minuchinâs assessment for the cause of mental disorders offers optimism while remedy is benign and unintrusive: if you discard unhealthy relationships and situations, you will be symptom-free. A symptom free life is therefore possible without being subjected to invasive medications and procedures. Dr. Minuchin has recognized that he is a salmon swimming upstream when he articulates this; but think about it: if his analysis was to become the norm, then 90% of the psychiatric community would need to become educated about relationship therapy. And it would also be more costly for the health insurance industry, which would then have to incur the expenses of reimbursing for more protracted relationship therapy instead of for the quick fixes of drug therapy. No wonder there is such resistance to accepting this not so novel assessment of mental health diagnosisâ-in spite of 60+ years of empirical evidence and scientific support for this perspective.
Although this may come as a shock to many readers, our current state of psychiatric diagnosis is NOT science. If it were, then psychotropic medications would not need to be persistently adjusted up or down in dosage, completely changed, and/or supplemented with other medications. The simple explanation for why medications so frequently fail to achieve a reduction in symptoms is because symptoms do not result from a chemical imbalance. Just compare the administration of medications for medical disorders: when, for example, an antibiotic is given for an infection, it is highly probable to be effective in resolving the symptoms. And if Dr. Minuchin was to be asked, he would likely explain that it is a patientâs history of having taken psychotropic medications that subsequently caused her/his chemical imbalance: in essence, such medications had upset a NORMAL chemical balance. Do not take my word for it: read the many books by Dr. Minuchin and the previously referred- to psychiatristsâ-all of whose writings are listed in the reference at the conclusion of this article.
Dr. Minuchinâs opinion is supported by the recent research of Dr. Irving Kirsch, psychologist at Harvard University, who discovered that a placebo was equally as effective as were antidepressants in treating mild to moderately depressed patients. It was only the small percentage of highly depressed patients who responded better to antidepressants.


