The Hidden Story of Male Victims of Domestic Violence

The SAVE Domestic Violence Legislative Project (DVLP) is a network of state-level groups working for domestic violence policies that protect victims, safeguard families, and respect due process.
Complaint Filed Against Marin County Superior Court Family Law Judge Bev Wood & Court CEO Kim Turner for Evidence...
Posted by Children's Rights on Thursday, August 20, 2015

DVLP efforts currently exist in the following states:
State-level groups advance through 4 steps to achieve full chapter status. Groups agree to follow the Ten Principles to Reform Domestic Violence Policies. For more information, contact INFORMATION
1. Facebook 
2. Policy Briefings
3. State Legislation
4. Campaign – working to raise candidates’ awareness of domestic violence issues
5. Previous Campaigns
In 2011, SAVE sponsored 105 radio interviews that reached an estimated 5.3 million radio listeners. Please support SAVE’s continuing efforts to get the truth out!
Women Against VAWA Excess – WAVE – is dedicated to exposing how the Violence Against Women Act has veered away from its original intended purpose to stop domestic violence. Now, VAWA has come to embrace a radical ideology that marginalizes true victims, harms families, and betrays the ideals of equality feminism.

WAVE also sponsors a Facebook page at . We invite women to drop by and share your experiences and concerns about VAWA and with the domestic violence programs in your area.

For information on submitting an article, contact:

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is up for reauthorization this year.

Despite its innocent-sounding name, the problem with VAWA is that it assails the family, the Constitution, and the economy. And it has failed to live up to its promises to help women –  see:
Tell Your Senators, Don't Co-Sponsor VAWA!
Dear Friends of Children's Rights,
Senator Leahy and VAWA supporters are six co-sponsors short of avoiding a filibuster. They are close, but that doesn't mean they will succeed. Not if we get busy and make a few phone calls.

If your senators have not become co-sponsors, call and thank them. Let them know that you do NOT want them to become co-sponsors. If your senators have co-sponsored VAWA, call two who haven't.

Tell them not to listen to the "If you're pro-women you're pro-VAWA" line. Remind them that women's groups like the Independent Women's Forum and Concerned Women for America have come out in opposition to VAWA. Or suggest they visit the Women Against VAWA Excess website to see what women really think about VAWA.
Have a few extra minutes? Call as many senators as possible who are not on the co-sponsor list.
We can do this, so let's get started...
Call your senators right now!
Honorable Patrick Leahy
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee

Honorable Chuck Grassley
Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee

Dear Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Grassley:

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – SAVE – is a victim advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to domestic violence. We are writing in regard to the recent July 13, 2011 Judiciary Committee hearing on the Violence Against Women Act.

To place this important issue in proper context, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has conducted two national surveys about intimate partner aggression:
• A survey of high school students found 10% of teenage girls had initiated dating violence, compared to only 9% of teenage boys. (I)
• A study of persons 18-28 years old concluded that females were the perpetrators in 70% of cases of one-way aggression. (II)

These government findings have been confirmed by over 250 scholarly investigations that show “women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.” (III)

The problem of female-initiated domestic violence recently made front-page news with the recent California case in which a woman hideously drugged, bound, and castrated her husband. (IV)

Against this background of research and national news, Dr. Phillip McGraw (a.k.a. “Dr. Phil”) was invited to be the lead witness for the recent Judiciary Committee hearing on the Violence Against Women Act. (V)

During the course of his testimony, Dr. McGraw repeatedly made statements that were one-sided, misleading, unverifiable, and/or demonstrably false:

1.) “2,000,000 women a year are victimized [by] being beaten, terrorized, and intimidated.” – This statement, based on research conducted by Murray Straus at the University of New Hampshire, found equal numbers of men were also victimized by domestic violence. Why did Dr. McGraw choose to cherry-pick the research?

2.) “In too many situations violence against women, young and old, is almost treated 
as an ‘acceptable crime.’” This statement is misleading and false. Research shows the vast majority (nine out of 10) of Americans view wife-beating as unacceptable. (VI) (Ironically, two out of 10 of persons still view domestic violence against men as acceptable.)

3.) “Domestic violence is now the most common cause of injury to women ages 15 to 44.” –This statement, which has been previously refuted by a leading family violence researcher, (VII) is a scurrilous misrepresentation of the facts. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control:

a.) In 1996, motor vehicle accidents and accidental falls were the leading causes of injury to women ages 15-44. Domestic violence ranked as the ninth cause of injury. (VIII)

b.) From 2004-2007, the leading causes of injury to women 15-24 years of age were falls, motor vehicle accidents, and overexertion, in that order. For women in the 25-44 year age group, the leading causes of injury were falls, overexertion, and motor vehicle accidents: (IX)

4.) "In fact, among teenage girls who are killed, nearly one-third is killed by a boyfriend or former boyfriend" – SAVE staff undertook an extensive search to locate the source of this statement, including the FBI Supplementary Homicide Reports. The source could not be located. Therefore, we conclude this unverifiable claim is a “factoid from nowhere.”

5.) Through use of gender-biased examples and terminology (e.g., “women,” “mothers,” “girls,” etc.), Dr. McGraw painted a picture of domestic violence that is oblivious to three decades of research, which shows approximate symmetry in the perpetration of intimate partner aggression between men and women.

6.) Dr. McGraw’s testimony often relied on emotion-laden phraseology and photographic images that were designed to play on persons’ feelings and passions. In conclusion, Dr. McGraw’s testimony was systematically biased, scientifically deficient, and deeply flawed. His testimony is reminiscent of the Jim Crow rape scares that focused on black-on-white rape, while studiously ignoring the problem of white-onwhite sexual assault.

Effective policy-making rests on sound research and unbiased evidence. Dr. McGraw’s statements are reckless because they could serve to justify and promote federal abuse reduction policies that are ineffective, neglectful of civil rights, and even harmful.

SAVE’s report, Most DV Educational Programs Lack Accuracy, Balance, and Truthfulness, documents how many claims by representatives of domestic violence organizations lack any basis in scientific fact. (X)

Ensuring the accuracy of domestic violence statements made to policymakers, the public, and criminal justice personnel should be an important public policy objective. We are therefore requesting that the Senate Judiciary Committee correct the numerous misleading, unverifiable, and erroneous statements of fact that permeate Dr. McGraw’s testimony. We furthermore request that the Judiciary Committee give consideration to the VAWA reauthorization including provisions to require third-party accreditation of all government-supported domestic violence training, education, and public awareness programs.

We look forward to working with you during the upcoming months to assure the prompt reauthorization and revitalization of the Violence Against Women Act.

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE)
P.O. Box 1221
Rockville, MD 20849
Office: 301-801-0608
Cell: 301-670-1964

SAVE is a 501(c)3 victim-advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to domestic violence.

Cc: All Members of the Senate
(I) HTTP://
(IX) , Table 4.


Senate Committee Passes VAWA Only on Party Vote (10-8).

The Senate Judiciary Committee passed VAWA on a party line vote, 10 Democrats in favor and 8 Republicans voting against. This was a good sign that VAWA is in trouble down the road when it comes up for votes in the Senate and House and good reason to continue to press Senators in your state to vote 'No' on VAWA.

And there is a good opportunity to change the DV law there but you need to contact state legislators before Monday.

We are continuing our efforts to repeal the Florida DV law and get the courts out of family life. Your can support our work here.

1. VAWA re-authorization uncertain.

1. The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) passed the Judiciary Committee but only on a party line vote. This is quite likely the first time it did not have bi-partisan support and presents an opportunity for defeating VAWA in either the Senate or the House. Start contacting senators and representatives now and tell them why VAWA should not be re-authorized.

DV Laws should require a warrant before a domestic abuse order could be issued and restricts the ability of police to make arrests without one.  However, the bill's provisions on 'domestic violence' warrants will die unless people speak up and make their voices heard.

Shared parenting efforts depend on reform and eventual repeal of these draconian 'domestic violence' laws.

It is imperative that people write the committee members (below) before next Monday, Feb. 6 and let them know how domestic abuse orders are issued without justification and the harm it causes to their family life and to their financial well-being.

Take Action Now!

Google+ Followers

Children's Rights Florida

Florida Family Law Reform

Family Law Community

Search This Blog

American Coalition for Fathers and Children

Means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.

Abuse (7) Abuse of power (1) Abuse of process (5) Admission to practice law (3) Adversarial system (83) Advocacy group (3) African American (1) Alienator (1) Alimony (7) All Pro Dad (1) All rights reserved (1) Allegation (2) Alliance for Justice (2) American Civil Liberties Union (3) American Psychological Association (1) Americans (2) Anecdotal evidence (2) Anti-discrimination law (1) Arrest (1) Bar association (1) Best interests (42) Bill (law) (1) British Psychological Society (1) Broward County (1) Broward County Public Schools (2) Brown University (1) Catholic Church (1) Center for Public Integrity (2) Chief judge (26) Child Abuse (48) Child custody (78) Child development (6) Child neglect (2) Child protection (15) Child Protective Services (19) Child Support (64) Children (3) Children's Rights (83) Christine Lagarde (1) Christmas (3) Circuit court (3) Civil and political rights (14) Civil law (common law) (1) Civil liberties (9) Civil Rights (145) Civil rights movement (1) Class action (1) Communist Party of Cuba (1) Confidentiality (1) Constitutional law (1) Constitutional right (5) Contact (law) (11) Contempt of court (4) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (1) Coparenting (28) Copyright (1) Copyright infringement (1) Corruption (1) Court Enabled PAS (92) Court order (2) Cuba (1) Cuban Missile Crisis (1) Cuban Revolution (1) Custodial Parent (1) Declaratory judgment (3) Denial of Reasonable Parent-Child Contact (110) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2) Divorce (124) Divorce Corp (6) Divorce Court (1) Documentary (25) Domestic Violence (51) Dr. Stephen Baskerville (5) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1) DSM-5 (1) DSM-IV Codes (1) Due Process (45) Due Process Clause (1) Dwyane Wade (1) Easter (1) Equal-time rule (2) Ethics (1) Events (10) Exposé (group) (1) Facebook (19) Fair use (1) False accusation (4) False Accusations (57) Family (1) Family (biology) (2) Family Court (198) Family Law (113) Family Law Reform (119) Family Rights (87) Family therapy (10) Father (12) Father figure (2) Father's Day (1) Father's Rights (12) Fatherhood (106) Fatherlessness Epidemic (4) Fathers 4 Justice (3) Fathers' rights movement (46) Fidel Castro (1) Florida (214) Florida Attorney General (7) Florida Circuit Courts (19) florida lawyers (30) Florida Legislature (6) Florida Senate (11) Foster care (1) Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1) Fraud (1) Free Speech (1) Freedom of speech (1) Frivolous litigation (1) Fundamental rights (12) Gainesville (1) Gender equality (1) Government Accountability Project (2) Government interest (2) Grandparent (3) Havana (1) Healthy Children (14) Human Rights (119) Human rights commission (1) I Love My Daughter (56) I Love My Son (8) Injunction (1) Innocence Project (1) Investigative journalism (1) Jason Patric (2) JavaScript (1) Joint custody (8) Joint custody (United States) (16) Judge (5) Judge Judy (7) Judge Manno-Schurr (55) Judicial Accountability (103) Judicial Immunity (7) Judicial misconduct (8) Judicial Reform (3) Judicial Watch (2) Judiciary (3) Jury trial (1) Kids for cash scandal (1) Law (2) Lawsuit (9) Lawyer (8) Legal Abuse (150) Liar Joel Greenberg (16) Linda Gottlieb (1) Litigant in person (1) Little Havana (1) Marriage (6) Matt O'Connor (1) Men's rights movement (1) Mental disorder (1) Mental health (2) Meyer v. Nebraska (1) Miami (44) Miami-Dade County (8) Miami-Dade County Public Schools (1) Miscarriage of justice (42) Mother (4) Motion of no confidence (1) Movie (4) Music (8) Nancy Schaefer (1) National Fatherhood Initiative (1) Natural and legal rights (1) News (89) Nixa Maria Rose (16) Non-governmental organization (1) Noncustodial parent (4) Organizations (60) Palm Beach County (1) Parent (35) Parental Alienation (116) Parental alienation syndrome (15) Parental Rights (36) Parenting (12) Parenting plan (6) Parenting time (7) Parents' rights movement (38) Paternity (law) (1) Personal Story (22) Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1) Pope (1) Posttraumatic stress disorder (27) President of Cuba (1) Pro Se (30) Pro se legal representation in the United States (3) Prosecutor (1) Protest (1) Psychological manipulation (1) Psychologist (1) Public accommodations (1) Public Awareness (108) Raúl Castro (1) Re-Post/Re-Blog (12) Research (1) Restraining order (4) Rick Scott (12) Second-class citizen (1) Self Representation-Pro Se (31) Sexism (1) Sexual abuse (2) Sexual assault (1) Shared Parenting (92) Single parent (6) Skinner v. Oklahoma (1) Social Issues (59) Social Media (1) Spanish (8) Stand Up For Zoraya (47) State school (1) Student (1) Supreme Court of Florida (8) Supreme Court of the United States (5) Tampa (1) Testimony (23) Thanksgiving (2) The Florida Bar (10) The Good Men Project (1) Trauma (4) Troxel v. Granville (2) True Story (21) Turner v. Rogers (1) United States (26) United States Congress (1) United States Constitution (1) United States Department of Justice (4) Videos (51) Violence Against Women Act (1) Whistle-blower (3)