"Nowhere in the judicial system is family advocated."

By "Family Courts", it should be clarified that it means all courts dealing in private family matters...ranging from actual "family" courts that adjudicate child visitation / support / custody, marriage / separation / nullity / dissolution to juvenile dependency courts, and in other instances, probate courts when the issues revolve around guardianship, conservatorship, stepparent adoption, etc.  Nowhere in the judicial system is family advocated...truly advocated. It simply does not...

Children's rights should include life with both parents. By Phyllis Schlafly Debates about same-sex marriage and gay adoptions always include the argument that a child has the right to both a father and a mother. .... If that is true, why is a child...

Malicious Mom and Parental Alienation Dynamics's photo."My children are a gift that God gave me. The state did not receive those children from God and then forward them on to me with conditions. God gave those children to me. I will stand before Him to be judged on how I raise my children, and I don't believe it's appropriate for the state to step in and either play God-- or play Parent!

ld me "You can't do that-the courts won't allow it." My response: "The courts have no say in what 2 parties decide and the courts can not tell you how to raise your own children!!"
With that being said people say "I can't go that long without seeing my kid" my response is if your not an asshole you can see your kid or even remain the custodial. This is simply the best way to avoid hostility while the child gets to benefit from both parents. If your hostile you shouldn't be around your kid or your ex more then once a year for the exchange. I've seen what hostility does to parents and to kids and it's NOT RIGHT!!

Roosevelt said, "One's dignity maybe assaulted, vandalized and cruelly mocked, but it can never be taken away unless it...
Posted by Children's Rights on Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Shared Facebook Photo.:
Christy Michelle
July 21 at 3:31pm ~
By "family courts," it should be clarified that it means all courts dealing in private family matters...ranging from actual "family" courts that adjudicate child visitation/support/custody, marriage/separation/nullity/dissolution to juvenile dependency courts, and in other instances, probate courts when the issues revolve around guardianship, conservatorship, stepparent adoption, etc. 

Nowhere in the judicial system is family advocated...truly advocated. It simply does not earn state/federal revenue. It benefits government and associated agencies, financially - speaking, NOT to uphold individual, inalienable rights to family, privacy, and protection against systemic abuse.

Thus, individuals who initiate legal interference in their lives to seek support and protection now encounter the agonizing micromanagement of their lives and those forced into the legal interface are usually plowed over by falsifications and lies, or at best, exaggerations of half-truths.

Justice that once may have existed is now diminished to a mere smoke screen of poisoned enticements, complex jargon, and a network of insurmountable hurdles(endless continuances, blocked attempts to file corrections and/or evidence, and a coy professional narcissistic approach to the law.

Clearly, those who do not have the interests of clients at heart *should* face punitive actions. Perhaps, in order to effectively change the overwhelmingly corrupt and broken system is not only to "follow the money" but, rather, re-budget to include such professional accountabilities capable of providing the internal motivation to do one's fundamental job.

Some say change the federal funding from ensuring ADOPTIONS to ensuring family REUNIFICATION AND/OR MEDIATIONS. Sure...this effectively addresses *some* of the colossal problem. However, it does not effectively focus on your ineffective counsel nor attorney/judicial misconduct. Since the majority of decisions are executed in courts and merely influenced by agency "advisors"/reports...the solutions, too, must address a multi-faceted audience.

The answer will not be sufficient if it only addresses a section of the " team": agency or attorney or judicial officers or the multitudes of court staff or foster/adopt parents, contracted providers, etc. In each of these, there DOES EXIST goodhearted individuals who are not intentionally destroying lives and families.

There are also those like Mr. Morales who has spoken out against such practices, and in my experience, some terrified for their own comfort and safety that they remain silent to the horrors in fear of retaliation.

I believe, from observation, wholeheartedly, that the lies were so thick by a FEW that others were, in a sense, unknowingly aiding in criminal acts. I also believe I could, if ever given the opportunity, spell out and separate nearly one-by-one which professionals/individuals were not purposeful in choosing ill intent.

One thing remains to remind me of the enormous task at hand...and, in sharing this, I hope to motivate with an empathetic support, my alienated, terminated, and struggling brother- and sister- parents out there...

What remains? You might say not a damn thing! Yes, I feel ya. I, too, have been frozen in time, unable to muster any effective thoughts, been incapable of advocating through the agony, and every other necessary motivator this path requires.

But, as many of you have been knowing or unknowing inspiration for others, you have challenged me to look inward...I am still blessed with intelligence, patience, spitfire determination, clout when deserving as much as demure when required...and it has taken a long time for me to have confidence in these facts again.

IF the worst happens and justice is not attained because the balance of evil in the world has permanently weighted the scales against our causes, then I would want my kids to remember the determination and courage I had FOR AND BECAUSE OF THEM.

I would be horrified if they learned of the empty, catatonic shell I have become. They are life, not just included as participants. One does not truly exist after being stripped of their own lives...and it is beyond time these heinous vindictive crimes are seen for what they are.

The greed that murders, whether in spirit or in physical form, have common dispose of someone/thing.

Motive is demonstrated in basic human malignancies of ethical and moral reasoning, but is not unique to this cause. Greed is at the root of numerous crimes.

The most offensive elements witnessed in our causes is the deliberate disregard demonstrated in opportunity and means, as they are easily seen in the extensive abuses of professional "powers". There are no " l "reasonable" explanations. There are no excuses.

One has free will and must use it in times of adversity. Even if one does not like the consequences one may face, one MUST repent, change, and correct the wrongdoings done by their own choices.

This is an ancient lesson and, for those of us who are spiritually inclined, God's single expectation above all lessons and rules. We must make right what we have made wrong. This is where we must not lose faith because the "professionals" will not, have not, and cannot be trusted to come clean in the future.

This is too massive for one to shoulder, so we must insist on placing our causes as yokes around their shoulders and effectively insist the changes be made for them.

This is my first step into re-joining the efforts. I hope my long-winded truth serum helps others self-motivate, too. More soon...~ 

This is a campaign that will require everyone's participation. We need one Million plus signatures to file in all 94...
Posted by Family Justice & Child Protection Worldwide Reform Committee on Thursday, July 23, 2015

Across the country women, children, AND MEN are becoming the victims of judges and the court system. It is time that we...
Posted by Children's Rights on Thursday, August 20, 2015

Take Action Now!

Google+ Followers

Children's Rights Florida

Florida Family Law Reform

Family Law Community

Search This Blog

American Coalition for Fathers and Children

Means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.

Abuse (7) Abuse of power (1) Abuse of process (5) Admission to practice law (3) Adversarial system (83) Advocacy group (3) African American (1) Alienator (1) Alimony (7) All Pro Dad (1) All rights reserved (1) Allegation (2) Alliance for Justice (2) American Civil Liberties Union (3) American Psychological Association (1) Americans (2) Anecdotal evidence (2) Anti-discrimination law (1) Arrest (1) Bar association (1) Best interests (42) Bill (law) (1) British Psychological Society (1) Broward County (1) Broward County Public Schools (2) Brown University (1) Catholic Church (1) Center for Public Integrity (2) Chief judge (26) Child Abuse (48) Child custody (78) Child development (6) Child neglect (2) Child protection (15) Child Protective Services (19) Child Support (64) Children (3) Children's Rights (83) Christine Lagarde (1) Christmas (3) Circuit court (3) Civil and political rights (14) Civil law (common law) (1) Civil liberties (9) Civil Rights (145) Civil rights movement (1) Class action (1) Communist Party of Cuba (1) Confidentiality (1) Constitutional law (1) Constitutional right (5) Contact (law) (11) Contempt of court (4) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (1) Coparenting (28) Copyright (1) Copyright infringement (1) Corruption (1) Court Enabled PAS (92) Court order (2) Cuba (1) Cuban Missile Crisis (1) Cuban Revolution (1) Custodial Parent (1) Declaratory judgment (3) Denial of Reasonable Parent-Child Contact (110) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2) Divorce (124) Divorce Corp (6) Divorce Court (1) Documentary (25) Domestic Violence (51) Dr. Stephen Baskerville (5) Dred Scott v. Sandford (1) DSM-5 (1) DSM-IV Codes (1) Due Process (45) Due Process Clause (1) Dwyane Wade (1) Easter (1) Equal-time rule (2) Ethics (1) Events (10) Exposé (group) (1) Facebook (19) Fair use (1) False accusation (4) False Accusations (57) Family (1) Family (biology) (2) Family Court (198) Family Law (113) Family Law Reform (119) Family Rights (87) Family therapy (10) Father (12) Father figure (2) Father's Day (1) Father's Rights (12) Fatherhood (106) Fatherlessness Epidemic (4) Fathers 4 Justice (3) Fathers' rights movement (46) Fidel Castro (1) Florida (214) Florida Attorney General (7) Florida Circuit Courts (19) florida lawyers (30) Florida Legislature (6) Florida Senate (11) Foster care (1) Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1) Fraud (1) Free Speech (1) Freedom of speech (1) Frivolous litigation (1) Fundamental rights (12) Gainesville (1) Gender equality (1) Government Accountability Project (2) Government interest (2) Grandparent (3) Havana (1) Healthy Children (14) Human Rights (119) Human rights commission (1) I Love My Daughter (56) I Love My Son (8) Injunction (1) Innocence Project (1) Investigative journalism (1) Jason Patric (2) JavaScript (1) Joint custody (8) Joint custody (United States) (16) Judge (5) Judge Judy (7) Judge Manno-Schurr (55) Judicial Accountability (103) Judicial Immunity (7) Judicial misconduct (8) Judicial Reform (3) Judicial Watch (2) Judiciary (3) Jury trial (1) Kids for cash scandal (1) Law (2) Lawsuit (9) Lawyer (8) Legal Abuse (150) Liar Joel Greenberg (16) Linda Gottlieb (1) Litigant in person (1) Little Havana (1) Marriage (6) Matt O'Connor (1) Men's rights movement (1) Mental disorder (1) Mental health (2) Meyer v. Nebraska (1) Miami (44) Miami-Dade County (8) Miami-Dade County Public Schools (1) Miscarriage of justice (42) Mother (4) Motion of no confidence (1) Movie (4) Music (8) Nancy Schaefer (1) National Fatherhood Initiative (1) Natural and legal rights (1) News (89) Nixa Maria Rose (16) Non-governmental organization (1) Noncustodial parent (4) Organizations (60) Palm Beach County (1) Parent (35) Parental Alienation (116) Parental alienation syndrome (15) Parental Rights (36) Parenting (12) Parenting plan (6) Parenting time (7) Parents' rights movement (38) Paternity (law) (1) Personal Story (22) Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1) Pope (1) Posttraumatic stress disorder (27) President of Cuba (1) Pro Se (30) Pro se legal representation in the United States (3) Prosecutor (1) Protest (1) Psychological manipulation (1) Psychologist (1) Public accommodations (1) Public Awareness (108) Raúl Castro (1) Re-Post/Re-Blog (12) Research (1) Restraining order (4) Rick Scott (12) Second-class citizen (1) Self Representation-Pro Se (31) Sexism (1) Sexual abuse (2) Sexual assault (1) Shared Parenting (92) Single parent (6) Skinner v. Oklahoma (1) Social Issues (59) Social Media (1) Spanish (8) Stand Up For Zoraya (47) State school (1) Student (1) Supreme Court of Florida (8) Supreme Court of the United States (5) Tampa (1) Testimony (23) Thanksgiving (2) The Florida Bar (10) The Good Men Project (1) Trauma (4) Troxel v. Granville (2) True Story (21) Turner v. Rogers (1) United States (26) United States Congress (1) United States Constitution (1) United States Department of Justice (4) Videos (51) Violence Against Women Act (1) Whistle-blower (3)