The research on divorced fathers is clear about their most pressing need: their continued meaningful involvement with their children, as active parents. The lack of recognition of this primary need is the main reason for therapists’ lack of success in engaging alienated fathers.
We applaud this judge for taking a stand against Parental Alienation and dealing with an abusive mother.
The complaint accuses Gorcyca of misconduct in her handling of the case and for making false statements to the commission in response to its initial inquiry about the long-running case involving the three minor children of Maya Eibschitz-Tsimhoni of Bloomfield Hills and Omer Tsimhoni of West Bloomfield. Source: Bloomfield-Bloomfield Hills Patch
“Child custody disputes can be very stressful. In cases of parental alienation in divorces, one parent repeatedly presents a negative view of the other to the child, so that the child no longer wants to spend time with the other parent. Such actions destroy the crucial parent-child relationship rather than strengthen it, and the child ends up suffering as a result,"
Catch Up on This Story
- Judge Sends Kids to Detention for Refusing Lunch with Dad
- New Twist in Case of Kids Sent to Juvie for Refusing Lunch with Dad
- Dad Seeks Custody of Kids Sent to Detention for Refusing Lunch with Him
- New Attorneys Defend Mom Whose Kids Refused Lunch with Dad
- Kids Who Refused Lunch with Dad Now Living With Him
- Judge in Bitter Custody Dispute Could Recuse Herself
- More Twists Bloomfield Hills Custody Case
- Chief Judge Steps Out of Bitter Child Custody Case
- New Judge Finds No Bias in Bitter Custody Dispute
