The Toxic Stress of Family Court
"A request for disability accommodation asking for the correction of this disability-causing problem would surpass reasonable into necessary.
"Court, you are disabling me by the severity of your removal of my children. Here's the medical evidence. Here's my request that you fix your proceedings/process and stop hurting our child/ren."
Understand that having your kids taken from you is not something the courts should be doing lightly. We all know that, but how does one push the issue before a court headed by entrenched child trafficking corruption?
My opinion is that no one should be bothering with that. Instead, it seems clear to mine eyes that "child separation anxiety" and subsequent "grief" are together "distinct mental disorder" clearly qualifying individual sufferers as "disabled".
The right of access to LEGITIMATE court services is discussed in Tennessee v. Lane. ~
"Title II (of the ADA) is aimed at the enforcement of a variety of basic rights, including the right of access to the courts at issue in this case, that call for a standard of judicial review at least as searching, and in some cases more searching, than the standard that applies to sexbased classifications."
In my opinion, and what I am currently working on, is not something so intimidating (at its genesis) as a full lawsuit against court officials (which almost assuredly would be doomed under the current unlawful doctrines the federal courts maintain toward snuffing out such suits), but rather something so simple that everyone reading this -- with or without much legal knowledge -- can accomplish it simply.
If diagnosed with any type of child separation anxiety (be honest) by a psychologist (or psychiatrist I guess, but I'd go with the psychologist on this one), then arguably such an evaluation would demonstrate "qualification" as a disabled person under the ADA. Legitimately based on excessive removal of one's own children.
Understanding and Responding to Toxic Stress:
- Mark Greenberg, Acting Assistant Secretary, ACF
- Dr. Kathy Edin, Johns Hopkins University
- Dr. David Pate, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee/
- Linda Mellgren, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services #goingthedistance @hmrf
A case for establishing complicated grief as a distinct mental disorder in DSM-V - SCIENCE DIRECT
 |
Strengthening Employment Pathways and Economic Stability for Low-Income Individuals and Families with Bill Browning, The Aspen Institute; Timothy Clark, Urban Ventures; Margaret Simms, Urban Institute; and Gregory Acs, Urban Institute at the Healthy Marriage, Responsible Fatherhood, and Tribal TANF--Child Welfare Grantees Annual Meeting
A request for disability accommodation asking for the correction of this disability-causing problem would surpass reasonable into necessary.
"Court, you are disabling me by the severity of your removal of my children. Here's the medical evidence. Here's my request that you fix your proceedings/process and stop hurting our child/ren."
Thomas M. Huguenor ~ Hi community. Thank you for the invitation +David Inguanzo. I've seen and enjoyed articles from many members of the community. Since I'm a family law attorney, my goal is to not intrude but to share at times things the community may be interested in.
Abstract
In this paper, we contend that complicated grief (CG) constitutes a distinct psychopathological diagnostic entity and thus warrants a place in standardized psychiatric diagnostic taxonomies. CG is characterized by a unique pattern of symptoms following bereavement that are typically slow to resolve and can persist for years if left untreated. This paper will demonstrate that existing diagnoses are not sufficient, as the phenomenology, risk factors, clinical correlates, course, and outcomes for CG are distinct from those of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and adjustment disorder (AD). It is argued that the establishment of CG as a diagnostic entity is essential because its symptoms are associated with enduring mental and physical health morbidity and require specifically designed clinical interventions. We conduct a critical review of all published evidence on this topic to date, demonstrating that the advantages of standardizing the diagnostic criteria of CG outweigh the disadvantages. In addition, recommendations for future lines of research are made. This paper concludes that CG must be established in the current nosology to address the needs of individuals who are significantly suffering and impaired by this disorder.
- Wendy G. Lichtenthala, , ,
- Dean G. Cruessa,
- Holly G. Prigersonb, c
- a Department of Psychology, 3720 Walnut Street, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- b Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- c Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Received 6 February 2004, Revised 10 May 2004, Accepted 6 July 2004, Available online 18 August 2004
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.002
Keywords
- Grief;
- Diagnosis;
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual;
- Taxonomies;
- Mental disorders
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. except certain content provided by third parties. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Cookies are used by this site. To decline or learn more, visit our Cookies page
Custodia, un tema delicado
CUSTODIA PATERNA -- Si algo de lo mucho que ocurre en la política que nos rodea me ha causado malestar últimamente, sin lugar a dudas debe ser el asunto de la custodia compartida y la alienación parental. En varias ocasiones me ha tocado ver, con dolor, que miembros de mi familia pasan por esa situación, en la que su padre o su madre los envenenan contra el otro, de manera totalmente egoísta. Por ello no puedo decir que estoy a favor o en contra de la medida legal, puesto que es complicado determinar quién tiene la razón en este tipo de casos, y pueden prestarse a situacion...more »
Custodia, un tema delicado
CUSTODIA PATERNA -- Si algo de lo mucho que ocurre en la política que nos rodea me ha causado malestar últimamente, sin lugar a dudas debe ser el asunto de la custodia compartida y la alienación parental. En varias ocasiones me ha tocado ver, con dolor, que miembros de mi familia pasan por esa situación, en la que su padre o su madre los envenenan contra el otro, de manera totalmente egoísta. Por ello no puedo decir que estoy a favor o en contra de la medida legal, puesto que es complicado determinar quién tiene la razón en este tipo de casos, y pueden prestarse a situacion...more »
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
Post by Fatherhoodgov.
via Family-Court Political Prisoner ~ Recognizing, from the court's very first act against me, that I was dealing with corruption -- I have maintained an electronic copy of everything in my divorce case (including connected contracts involved), which includes all records directed towards numerous appeals. It also includes a connected workers comp case whose records reflect a medical evaluation deeming the family court the primary injuring party.
ReplyDeleteI have all records in all cases saved electronically and backed up to no less than five other locations because I'm learned. In my bereavement from my children, I was nothing less than... prolific.
My case easily attaches to Fabricius v. Fabricius and Fox v. Rogers; we are a small group of current family court litigants in Tulare County, California standing together united against local case-fixing.
Ms. Pam Fox, Mr. Fabricius and I are old hats at being targeted by local authorities for our court cases. We don't care about the constant retaliation and are now going ahead together full chest.
An interview with the three of us would be quite edifying for the greater public. Particularly in this area where we are just north of the infamous Kern County, California (see Sean Penn's "Witchhunt").
Her case alone is the stuff of every mommy's family court nightmares. She's been very strong. Bill he's a disabled veteran from our Navy forces. As just one issue in his case, he's paying child support. He's never had children. His ranch has been repeatedly targeted. He lives under constant harassment from the county.
Me I live here, a political prisoner of America's (and specifically California's) judicial system. Keeping records on a growing tableau of family courtroom crimes -- seeing a weaving pattern leading to?
Remember. Jesus picked it!
Matthew 21 NIV
biblehub.com
1As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples, 2saying to them, “Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will find a donkey tied there, with her colt by her. Untie them and bring them to me. 3If anyone says anything to you, say that the…
You must secure FACTS for your life... a fact is a truth... so let there be truth!! and light of course... and let that truth be that you have a court order from a judge or magistrate that defines your legal status as a parent based on your abilities and the best interests of yourself as a parent to this child and this child's interests respective of parental guidance.
ReplyDeleteDo not wait, do not ponder... do not will and wish and wash your own face with your tears. Simply gather the strength of your love for your child and the self respect and self love you have... Figure out the exact process to establish legal rights defined in a court order (starting with a piece of paper where you write down what you want from your relationship with your child WITHOUT the Mother being a part of your wants on this list...). Determine the process cost and starting point and start positioning yourself to engage the process.
Do not use the word 'fathers rights' in court. Use PARENTAL RIGHTS. Do not use HUMAN RIGHTS as a reference to a judge because the judge knows that is the end all and starting point of all rights and it can subconsciously come out as a condescending reference to a 'bigger idea'; instead use references such as: 'In regards to best interests of parenting' Approach 'parenting' as an idea that means so much more then Man Vs Woman (because it does...) and sell that... because most likely even some of the people reading this have deep seeds believing women are better or more natural parents then men. The reality is that you can brain wash children to grow up believing realities that simply divide and harm others.
Never should a law read Fathers, Mothers... It should simply read: Parents... a Parents rights account for the rights of a parent. the moment a gender is assigned, it is a gender discriminative marker granting access to violate your human rights.
You may not be able to get exactly what you want, or run through the streets waving the 'fathers rights' or HUMAN RIGHTS flag.... but you can learn how to speak to those who hold positions of authority and you can secure your rights as a parent.
If you have the strength and aptitude to stand up for yourself as a parent. You MUST also write ONE letter to your local representatives and request that laws be reviewed to grant Equality to parents irregardless of gender and site local region or area examples of how gender bias prevents the best interest of a child from having two loving equal parents to raise that child.